Forensic approach to predict film thickness of reacted and activated rubber (RARX) modified asphalt mixtures
Source abstract
Abstract
The major objective of this study was to arrive at an optimum threshold asphalt binder film thickness, Tf∗ and develop Tf∗ predictive equation that includes materials and mixture properties, which could be used in all future forensic assessment of asphalt mixtures. Also, 18 field asphalt mixtures constructed as test sections were investigated for their field performance and correlated with Tf∗. Furthermore, the performance criteria set by Arizona department of transportation (ADOT) in the USA to assess the field mixtures were related to Tf∗ established in this study. An optimum Tf∗ of 12 µ was selected as the threshold magnitude for asphalt mixtures that incorporates activated crumb rubber modified products, termed RARX. It was found that with increase in the overall cumulative surface area (SA) of the mix matrix, the required binder content also increased, in turn decreasing Tf∗. Tf∗ predictive equation encompassing materials properties and associated volumetrics was established as a best-fit nonlinear regression model that had excellent statistical measures: R2 = 99.8%; Se/Sy = 0.0447. It is noteworthy that the predictive model was established using the robust concept that introduced utilisation of SA of the whole mixture matrix, including, those that of SA of aggregate fractions not estimated by current models. Based on the methodical approach followed in this study to calculate Tf∗, it is recommended that more amount of RARX be tried in other mixtures to enhance pavement performance. The current study involved only 18 field asphalt mixtures, amongst which six were without RARX. So, it is suggested that additional field sections be placed and monitored for their performance keeping in mind the volumetrics and specifically, Tf∗, which can potentially be a quality control parametric assessor for field performance forensic evaluation, and that which becomes an integral characteristic in perpetual pavement design philosophy.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical and construction materials studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, Tirupati, India
CONSULPAV International, Milharado–Mafra, Portugal
CONSULPAV International, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Anderson, R. M. & Bahia, H. U. (1997). Evaluation and selection of aggregate gradations for asphalt mixtures using superpave (Transportation Research Record 1583). Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council (pp. 91–97).10.3141/1583-11 ↗
2. Campen J. F. · Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1959 · 28 · 149
3. Elseifi, M. A., Al-Qadi, I. L., Yang, H. S. & Carpenter, H. S. (2008). Validity of asphalt binder film thickness concept in hot-mix asphalt (Transportation Research Record 2057). Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council (pp. 37–45).10.3141/2057-05 ↗
4. 10.31274/rtd-180813-1537810.31274/rtd-180813-15378 ↗
5. Hinrichsen, J. A. & Heggen, J. (1996). Minimum voids in mineral aggregate in hot-mix asphalt based on gradation and volumetric properties (Transportation Research Record 1545). Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council (pp. 75–79).10.1177/0361198196154500110 ↗
6. Ishai I. · 2014
7. Kandhal P. S. · 1996
8. Kandhal P. S. · 1998
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.04310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.043 ↗
10. Kedarisetty S. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2018 · 46 · 251110.1520/JTE20170211 ↗
11. Mix Design Methods for Asphalt Concrete (MS-02). (2014). 7th ed. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute.
12. Panda R. P. · Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering · 2016 · 3 · 127
13. Radovskiy, B. (2003). Analytical formulas for film thickness in compacted asphalt mixture (Transportation Research Record 1829). Washington, DC: National Research Council (pp. 26–32).10.3141/1829-04 ↗
14. Roberts F. L. · 1996
15. Sousa J. · 2012
16. Sousa, J., Vorobiev, A., Rowe, G. & Ishai, I. (2013). Reacted and activated rubber-elastomeric asphalt extender (Transportation Research Record 2371). Washington, DC: National Research Council (pp. 32–40).10.3141/2371-04 ↗