Fracture-Based Method to Determine Flexural Capacity of Concrete Beams on Soil
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT A method to predict the fracture response of concrete beams utilizing cohesive crack elements was expanded from a three-point bending beam to a beam on soil boundary condition. The simulations were compared with monotonic three-point bending beam and beam on soil tests, verifying the cohesive elements with a bilinear softening curve defined by the concrete's fracture and tensile strength properties can effectively predict the flexural capacity and post-peak behavior of both specimen configurations. Vertical and horizontal springs idealized the soil support to the beams. Whether the springs were linear or nonlinear elastic had a limited effect on the peak load capacity of the concrete beams on soil. At pre-peak and peak load levels, the two concrete beam configurations had similar stress patterns and crack propagation levels in spite of the different boundary conditions. The method simplicity and accuracy under different boundary conditions offers a promising approach that can be extended to predicting the flexural capacity of concrete slabs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. ARA, Inc. ERES Consultants Division · 2007
2. Barbosa-Soares J. · 2003
3. Bazant ZP · 1998
4. 10.1016/S0013-7944(01)00084-410.1016/S0013-7944(01)00084-4 ↗
5. Davids W. · 1998
6. 10.3141/2113-1510.3141/2113-15 ↗
7. Federal Aviation Administration · 2009
8. Fischer J. · 1984 · 1
9. 10.3141/2020-0310.3141/2020-03 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.04010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.02.040 ↗
11. 2009
12. 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-710.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0247291910.1007/BF02472919 ↗
14. Ioannides A. M. · 1984 · 10
15. Ioannides A. M. · 2004
16. 10.3141/1919-0610.3141/1919-06 ↗
17. 10.1080/1029843060079899410.1080/10298430600798994 ↗
18. Jenq YS · Journal of Engineering Mechanics · 1985 · 10 · 227
19. 10.3141/1730-0210.3141/1730-02 ↗
20. 10.3141/1809-0710.3141/1809-07 ↗
21. 10.3141/1919-0210.3141/1919-02 ↗
22. Khazanovich L. · 1994
23. Khazanovich L. · 2000
24. Kohler E. · 2005
25. 10.1016/S0013-7944(99)00111-310.1016/S0013-7944(99)00111-3 ↗
26. Park K. · 2005
27. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.02.00210.1016/j.engfracmech.2008.02.002 ↗
28. Park K. · 2009
29. Petersson P E · 1981
30. Rao S. · 2005
31. 10.3141/2081-1210.3141/2081-12 ↗
32. Roesler J. R. · 1998
33. Roesler J. R. · 2004
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:5(452)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:5(452) ↗
35. Roesler J. R. · 2005
36. Roesler J. R. · 2006
37. Roesler J. R. · 2006
38. 10.1061/40838(191)4410.1061/40838(191)44 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.12.00210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2006.12.002 ↗
40. 10.3141/2037-0410.3141/2037-04 ↗
41. Roelfestra , PE and Wittmann , F H . 1986.Numerical method to link strain softening with failure of concrete, Fracture Toughness and Fracture Energy of ConcreteEdited by: Wittmann , FH . 163–175. Elsevier Science Publishers. ed
42. Subramaniam K. V. · Proceedings MRS Fall Meeting · 1997 · 503 · 15110.1557/PROC-503-151 ↗
43. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:11(1258)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:11(1258) ↗
44. Subramaniam K. V. · ACI Materials Journal · 1999 · 96 · 663
45. Subramaniam K. V. · Journal of Engineering Mechanics, (ASCE) · 2000 · 126 · 89110.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:9(891) ↗
46. 10.1007/BF0247252510.1007/BF02472525 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0008-8846(99)00186-610.1016/S0008-8846(99)00186-6 ↗
48. Zollinger D. G. · ACI Materials Journal · 1993 · 90 · 463
49. Zollinger D. G. · 1994 · 91