Mechanical and dynamic behaviour of walnut shell powder-stabilised clayey soils for sustainable pavement subgrades
Source abstract
Abstract
This study examines the effectiveness of walnut shell powder (WNSP), a sustainable, bio-based stabiliser, in enhancing the mechanical and dynamic properties of expansive high-plasticity clay (CH) and low-plasticity clay (CL) soils. Laboratory tests on soils treated with 0–15% WNSP (by dry weight) evaluated its impact on unconfined compressive strength (UCS), California Bearing Ratio (CBR), and resilient modulus (MR). Optimal improvements were observed at approximately 6% WNSP for CH and 9% for CL soils, with UCS increasing by 33.7% and 41.4%, and CBR by 50.7% and 87.6%, respectively. The resilient modulus, reflecting cyclic stiffness, rose by 149.3% in CH and 31.0% in CL soils. Stress-state-dependent prediction models, particularly Uzan-type formulations, effectively captured the nonlinear resilient behaviour of WNSP-stabilised soils. An extended Modified Uzan model incorporating WNSP-dependent coefficients further improved prediction accuracy. Results highlight WNSP as an eco-friendly, cost-effective stabiliser, utilising agricultural waste for sustainable pavement subgrades.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Soil and Unsaturated Flow
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Bitlis Eren University
Mus Alparslan University
Funding
Muş Alparslan University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit
References (94)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmad, M. B., & Bhukal, A. (2021). Stabilization of red soil by using walnut shell powder, walnut shell ash and rice husk ash. International Journal of Scientific Research and Development, 9(8), 113–114.
2. 10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.10252710.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102527 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3912410.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39124 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41598-025-94980-510.1038/s41598-025-94980-5 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10064-024-03638-510.1007/s10064-024-03638-5 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.02.00210.1016/j.trgeo.2014.02.002 ↗
7. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1993). Guide for design of pavement structures.
8. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (1995). Aashto M 145: Standard specification for classification of soils and soil-aggregate mixtures for highway construction purposes.
9. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). (2003). Standard method of test for determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials (AASHTO T307).
10. 10.1080/14680629.2014.89153310.1080/14680629.2014.891533 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000154710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001547 ↗
12. ASTM International. (2007). ASTM D1883-07: Standard test method for CBR (California Bearing Ratio) of laboratory-compacted soils.
13. ASTM International. (2013). ASTM D2166-13: Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil.
14. ASTM International. (2014). ASTM D4546-14: Standard test methods for one-dimensional swell or collapse of soils.
15. ASTM International. (2017). ASTM D2487-17: Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)..
16. ASTM International. (2017). ASTM D6913-17: Standard test methods for particle-size distribution (gradation) of soils using sieve analysis.
17. ASTM International. (2017). ASTM D7928-17: Standard test method for particle-size distribution (gradation) of fine-grained soils using the sedimentation (hydrometer) analysis.
18. ASTM International. (2018). ASTM D420-18: Standard guide for site characterization for engineering design and construction purposes.
19. ASTM International. (2018). ASTM D4318-18: Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils.
20. ASTM International. (2021). ASTM D1557-21: Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)).
21. ASTM International. (2023). ASTM D854-23: Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by the water displacement method.
22. Austroads. (2017). Guide to pavement technology: Part 2 – Pavement structural design. Austroads Ltd.
23. Bade, R., Ali, S., Rathod, S., & Khan, M. A. (2018). Expansive soil stabilization by using walnut shell powder ash. In Proceedings of the national conference on advances in engineering and applied science (NCAEAS) (pp. 169–171). Anjuman College of Engineering and Technology.
24. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.02.01110.1016/j.jrmge.2022.02.011 ↗
25. 10.1108/JEDT-12-2019-035010.1108/JEDT-12-2019-0350 ↗
26. 10.1080/14680629.2025.248783010.1080/14680629.2025.2487830 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0181510.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01815 ↗
28. British Standards Institution. (1990). BS 1377-2:1990: Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes – Classification tests.
29. Bureau of Indian Standards. (2002). IS 2720 (Part 40):1977 (Reaffirmed 2002): Methods of test for soils – Part 40: Determination of free swell index of soils.
30. 10.1080/14680629.2016.119488410.1080/14680629.2016.1194884 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.10034210.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100342 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.11590510.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115905 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:7(568)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:7(568) ↗
34. Dunlap, W. A. (1963). A mathematical model describing the deformation characteristics of granular materials [Technical Report]. Texas A&M University.
35. 10.1680/gein.14.0001110.1680/gein.14.00011 ↗
36. FAO. (2023). Food and agriculture organization corporate statistical database (FAOSTAT). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
37. 10.1007/s11356-020-08768-310.1007/s11356-020-08768-3 ↗
38. 10.1186/s40703-023-00194-x10.1186/s40703-023-00194-x ↗
39. Green, J. L., & Hall, J. W. (1975). Nondestructive vibratory testing of airport pavements. Volume 1: Experimental test results and development of evaluation methodology and procedure (Technical Report S-75-14, Vol. 1). U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station.
40. 10.4236/fns.2018.9807610.4236/fns.2018.98076 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.16110.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.161 ↗
42. Hicks R. G. (1970). Factors influencing the resilient properties of granular materials (Doctoral dissertation University of California Berkeley). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/302509484
43. Hopkins, T. C., Beckham, T. L., Sun, L., & Ni, B. (2001). Resilient modulus of Kentucky soils [Research Report]. Kentucky Transportation Center. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/ktc_researchreports/280/
44. 10.1080/14680629.2022.212885810.1080/14680629.2022.2128858 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.01310.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.013 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.14710.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.147 ↗
47. Iowa Statewide Urban Design and Specifications (SUDAS) Program. (2022). Sudas design manual: Chapter 6 – Geotechnical. Iowa SUDAS. https://www.iowasudas.org/manuals/design-manual/#chapter-6-geotechnical
48. 10.1007/s10064-022-02797-710.1007/s10064-022-02797-7 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.10032710.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100327 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.09.00610.1016/j.trgeo.2018.09.006 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.15710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.157 ↗
52. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000326010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003260 ↗
53. McCarthy, D. (1997). Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: Basic geotechnics. Prentice Hall.
54. 10.1007/s13369-024-08896-910.1007/s13369-024-08896-9 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.39710.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.397 ↗
56. Monismith, C. L., Hicks, R. G., & Salam, Y. M. (1971). Basic properties of pavement components: FHWA-RD72-19 final report, FCP 34A2-031. Federal Highway Administration.
57. Moossazadeh, J., & Witczak, M. W. (1981). Prediction of subgrade moduli for soil that exhibits nonlinear behavior. Transportation Research Record, 810, 9–17.
58. 10.1080/14680629.2018.153013110.1080/14680629.2018.1530131 ↗
59. NCHRP. (2004). Nchrp 1-28A: Harmonized test methods for laboratory determination of resilient modulus for flexible pavement design (Vol. 1). Transportation Research Board.
60. Ni, B., Hopkins, T. C., Sun, L., & Beckham, T. L. (2020). Modeling the resilient modulus of soils. In A. Gomes Correia (Ed.), Bearing capacity of roads (Vol. 2, pp. 1131–1142). CRC Press.10.1201/9781003078821-34 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0362810.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03628 ↗
62. 10.3141/1874-1310.3141/1874-13 ↗
63. Papp, W. J., Maher, A., Bennert, T., & Gucunski, N. (2000). Resilient modulus properties of New Jersey subgrade soils (Report No. FHWA NJ 2000-01). Rutgers University, Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/42168
64. Parvez, Z., Vikram, A., & Singh, P. P. (2023). Stabilization of black soil using walnut shell powder & ash. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 10(3), 729–730.
65. 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10687410.1016/j.rineng.2025.106874 ↗
66. 10.1080/14680629.2025.250559710.1080/14680629.2025.2505597 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10672710.1016/j.jobe.2023.106727 ↗
68. 10.1007/s10064-025-04159-510.1007/s10064-025-04159-5 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.10468510.1016/j.rineng.2025.104685 ↗
70. Powell, W. D., Potter, J. F., Mayhew, H. C., & Nunn, M. E. (1984). The structural design of bituminous roads (Laboratory Report 1132). Transport and Road Research Laboratory (TRRL).
71. Sabat, A. K., & Pati, S. (2014). A review of literature on stabilization of expansive soil using solid wastes. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 19(6), 251–256.
72. 10.31026/j.eng.2023.09.0710.31026/j.eng.2023.09.07 ↗
73. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000033610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000336 ↗
74. Sargand, S. M., Wasniak, D. L., Masada, T., & Beegle, D. (2000). Evaluation of initial subgrade variability on the Ohio SHRP test road: Interim report for continued monitoring of instrumented pavement in Ohio (Report No. FHWA/OH-2000/004). Ohio University, Center for Geotechnical and Environmental Research. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/15360
75. 10.1080/14680629.2024.233519110.1080/14680629.2024.2335191 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.sandf.2016.02.00410.1016/j.sandf.2016.02.004 ↗
77. 10.1007/s10924-012-0420-y10.1007/s10924-012-0420-y ↗
78. 10.1038/s41598-024-80135-510.1038/s41598-024-80135-5 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13666310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136663 ↗
80. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13243510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132435 ↗
81. The Stationery Office. (2006). Pavement design and maintenance – Foundations (Vol. 7). Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB), HD 26/06.
82. 10.4236/eng.2017.91206010.4236/eng.2017.912060 ↗
83. Türkiye Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğü. (2013). Karayolları Teknik Şartnamesi.
84. Uzan, J. (1985). Characterization of granular material. Transportation Research Record, 1022(1), 52–59.
85. 10.1002/nag.161016060510.1002/nag.1610160605 ↗
86. Venkatesh, A., & Reddy, G. S. (2016). Effect of waste saw dust ash on compaction and permeability properties of black cotton soil. International Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 7(1), 27–32.
87. Witczak, M., & Uzan, J. (1988). The universal airport pavement design system, Report I of IV: Granular material characterization. University of Maryland.
88. 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0411810.1016/j.cscm.2024.e04118 ↗
89. 10.1155/2022/678812010.1155/2022/6788120 ↗
90. 10.1007/s40996-022-00938-210.1007/s40996-022-00938-2 ↗
91. 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e0198510.1016/j.cscm.2023.e01985 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2025.10155810.1016/j.trgeo.2025.101558 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.jobe.2024.10974510.1016/j.jobe.2024.109745 ↗
94. Zumrawi M. M. E. (2000). Performance and design of expansive soils as road subgrade [Doctoral dissertation Chang'an University].