Influence of confining pressure on rubberised cement bound aggregate behaviour during static triaxial test
Source abstract
Abstract
The aim of this research was to better understand the influence of adding waste rubber in cement bound aggregate (CBA) by testing both the unconfined and triaxial stress state. CBA with waste rubber was tested in this manner aiming to analyse influence of the confining pressure on the material behaviour. The results indicate that adding 20% rubber to a high cement content mix can assimilate the high stiffness caused by the high cement paste content, resulting in a mixture with increased cement paste content to facilitate in situ compaction. Additionally, a low confining pressure of 40 kPa has the most impact on the elastic properties/stiffness and it would be more appropriate to measure the CBA elasticity modulus with moderate lateral (confining) pressure. Finally, the practical implication of this research is that, in pavement mechanistic-empirical design, a correction of the measured uniaxial static modulus of elasticity by 10–15% should be adopted.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
Funding
Croatian Science Foundation
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/14680629.2020.180851910.1080/14680629.2020.1808519 ↗
2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials AASHTO. (2012). AASHTO T 307-14: Standard method of test for determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials.
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11923410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119234 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.03310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.033 ↗
5. 10.3390/app1301066410.3390/app13010664 ↗
6. 10.24425/ace.2021.13648510.24425/ace.2021.136485 ↗
7. 10.1520/JTE2013007010.1520/JTE20130070 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.00610.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.006 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13178010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131780 ↗
10. European Committee for Standardization. (CEN). (2005). HRN EN 13286-51:2005 Unbound and hydraulically bound mixtures - Part 51. Method for the manufacture of test specimens of hydraulically bound mixtures using vibrating hammer compaction.
11. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). (2013). EN 1097-6. Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates – Part 6: Determination of particle density and water absorption; 2013.
12. European Committee for Standardization. (CEN). (2021). EN 13286-41: Unbound and hydraulically bound mixtures – Part 41: Test method for determination of the compressive strength of hydraulically bound mixtures.
13. European Committee for Standardization. (CEN-a). (2003). EN 13286-43:2003 Unbound and hydraulically bound mixtures. Test method for the determination of the modulus of elasticity of hydraulically bound mixtures. CEN/TC 227.
14. European Committee for Standardization. (CEN-a). (2004). EN 13286-7 Unbound and hidraulically bound mixtures - Part 7: Cyclic load triaxial test for unbound mixtures.
15. European Committee for Standardization (CEN-b). (2003). EN 13286-4. Unbound and hidraulically bound mixtures – Part 4: Test methods for laboratory reference density and water content (Vibrating hammer).
16. European Committee for Standardization. (CEN-b). (2004). EN 14227-1: Hydraulically bound mixtures - Specifications - Part 1: Cement bound granular mixtures.
17. European Tyre and Rubber Manufacturers Association ETRMA. (2019). The European tyre industry facts and figures 2020 edition. Retrieved 9.8. from https://www.etrma.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Figures-leaflet-updated-front-2019-larger-NEW-LABEL.pdf [cited 2020. 9.8.].
18. Eurostat. (2021). Passenger cars in the EU https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Passenger_cars_in_the_EU [cited 4.5.2022.].
19. 10.1080/14680629.2019.160592410.1080/14680629.2019.1605924 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.05910.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.059 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12003810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120038 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.07110.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.071 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.11910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.119 ↗
24. 10.1080/14680629.2018.151251710.1080/14680629.2018.1512517 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.19710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.197 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.10082910.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100829 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e0200110.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02001 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12210710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122107 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12734410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127344 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.10467910.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104679 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13161210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131612 ↗
32. Nageim, H. A., Visulios, P., & Saghafi, B. (2010). Resilient modulus of hydraulically bound road base materials with high volume waste dust. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 4, 7.
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.007 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11857710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118577 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12746810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127468 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.10472210.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104722 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.10710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.107 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.04210.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.042 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11970810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119708 ↗
40. 10.12989/gae.2015.9.2.21910.12989/gae.2015.9.2.219 ↗
41. 10.1080/14680629.2012.75593510.1080/14680629.2012.755935 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12704810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127048 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.13011310.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130113 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.10558510.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105585 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12748810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127488 ↗
46. 10.3390/app1111475010.3390/app11114750 ↗