journal article·2024-06-02

Interface contact properties in asphalt pavement using 3D laser scanning technology

Hongzhi He, Guolong Wang, Ali Rahman, Changfa Ai

Publisher page

Abstract

Existing research on pavement interlayer bonding has mainly focused on bonding materials and external factors, neglecting the upper and lower interlayer surface characteristics. This study aims to analyze the contact conditions between these surfaces, developing a numerical model to reveal their properties. Five double-layered asphalt systems, including dense-graded asphalt concrete (AC), open-graded friction course (OGFC), and stone mastic asphalt (SMA) mixes, were examined using a nondestructive interlayer separation method and 3D laser scanning. Three indices were proposed to assess interlayer surface characteristics in both 2D and 3D domains. Shear strength tests at room temperature were also conducted, revealing that AC-only systems had lower surface mismatch at the layer interface compared to SMA or OGFC mixes. The study concludes that surface mismatch decreases with greater differences in aggregate coarseness, and systems with significant mismatch gaps have lower shear strength. These findings provide valuable insights for designing durable pavement structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China

Key Laboratory for Highway Engineering of Sichuan Province, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, USA

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Sichuan Science and Technology Program · Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, SWJTU

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12598310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125983 ↗
2. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000195210.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001952 ↗
3. 10.1080/10298436.2018.146187010.1080/10298436.2018.1461870 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12653810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126538 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11893610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118936 ↗
6. 10.1139/cjce-2018-029010.1139/cjce-2018-0290 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.09.01010.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.09.010 ↗
8. China, C. o. (2011). Standard test methods of bitumen and bituminous mixtures for highway engineering (Vol. JTG E, 20–2011. Highway Research Institute Ministry of Transport.
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12350610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123506 ↗
10. 10.1080/10298436.2020.182571210.1080/10298436.2020.1825712 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11669310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116693 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.03210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.032 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12706110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127061 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.08810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.088 ↗
15. 10.1088/1757-899x/236/1/01200510.1088/1757-899x/236/1/012005 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.10030210.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100302 ↗
17. 10.1088/1755-1315/719/3/03207010.1088/1755-1315/719/3/032070 ↗
18. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000405110.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0004051 ↗
19. 10.1080/10298436.2014.93771510.1080/10298436.2014.937715 ↗
20. 10.1680/tran.2003.156.2.7310.1680/tran.2003.156.2.73 ↗
21. 10.3390/infrastructures502002110.3390/infrastructures5020021 ↗
22. 10.1186/s43065-021-00029-y10.1186/s43065-021-00029-y ↗
23. 10.1155/2021/887029510.1155/2021/8870295 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10882810.1016/j.measurement.2020.108828 ↗
25. 10.1109/access.2020.301390110.1109/access.2020.3013901 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12694610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126946 ↗
27. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000333010.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003330 ↗
28. 10.1680/jgein.17.0000710.1680/jgein.17.00007 ↗
29. 10.1080/14680629.2011.64411310.1080/14680629.2011.644113 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11930910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119309 ↗
31. 10.1080/10298436.2021.189442010.1080/10298436.2021.1894420 ↗
32. 10.1080/01694243.2016.120524010.1080/01694243.2016.1205240 ↗
33. 10.1080/10298436.2019.159341010.1080/10298436.2019.1593410 ↗
34. 10.1061/JHTRCQ.000071310.1061/JHTRCQ.0000713 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.10323810.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103238 ↗
36. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000369710.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003697 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.12.01410.1016/j.geotexmem.2020.12.014 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11806310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118063 ↗
39. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000190710.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001907 ↗
40. 10.1061/jpeodx.000005610.1061/jpeodx.0000056 ↗
41. 10.1061/(Asce)0887-3828(2008)22:3(154)10.1061/(Asce)0887-3828(2008)22:3(154) ↗
42. Vaitkus, A., Cygas, D., Laurinavicius, A., Vorobjovas, V., & Kleiziene, R. (2012). Research of asphalt layers bonding in Lithuanian pavement. Road and Rail Infrastructure Ii, 357–364.
43. 10.3846/bjrbe.2011.2710.3846/bjrbe.2011.27 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.11000310.1016/j.measurement.2021.110003 ↗
45. 10.1155/2020/884113910.1155/2020/8841139 ↗
46. 10.1080/14680629.2017.132987410.1080/14680629.2017.1329874 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jtte.2020.10.00510.1016/j.jtte.2020.10.005 ↗
48. 10.1007/s11709-020-0617-410.1007/s11709-020-0617-4 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jtte.2019.01.00310.1016/j.jtte.2019.01.003 ↗
50. 10.1080/14680629.2017.132986610.1080/14680629.2017.1329866 ↗