Performance evaluation of dense mixtures with stabilised rubber modified asphalt
Source abstract
Abstract
Asphalt rubber (AR) has been used worldwide in road engineering not only for improving the performance of asphalt mixtures but also for providing an advantage in environmental protection. Yet the application of AR is greatly restricted in China for its shortcoming of being only possible to be used in a gap or open gradation mixture to ensure stripping resistance as well as anti-rutting performance. Stabilised rubber modified asphalt (SRMA) with lower high-temperature viscosity and better store stability than traditional AR was developed in our previous research and has been widely applied in projects with good results. In this paper, to evaluate the validation of SRMA in dense mixtures, five kinds of dense mixtures commonly used in China were designed with SRMA as binder. Engineering properties, including high-temperature performance, low-temperature performance, moisture stability, fatigue performance and mechanical properties, including dynamic modulus and phase angle were laboratory evaluated and analysed. For the purpose of comparison, a kind of representative styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) polymer modified asphalt commonly used in China was selected to prepare samples with the same gradation of SRMA mixtures, and the same performance tests were conducted. In addition, a brief cost analysis among SRMA, SBS-modified asphalt and traditional AR was performed. Results show good performance and economy of SRMA and corresponding dense mixtures, thus it is possible, using SRMA for dense mixture design in practical engineering, to reduce construction cost.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Amirkhanian S. N. · 1993
2. Bai Q. F. · Journal of Southeast University (English Edition) · 2009 · 25 · 395
3. Bonaquist R. · 200810.17226/14158 ↗
4. Cao W. D. · Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science) · 2006 · 34 · 1026
5. Doh Y. S. · Journal of Korean Society of Road Engineers · 2007 · 9 · 149
6. Doh, Y. S., Park, T. W., Kim, H. H. & Kim, K. W. (2007b, October).Estimation of freezing and thawing resistance of CRM-modified asphalt mixture. Proceedings, conference of Korean society of road engineers, Seoul, Korean (pp. 257–262).
7. Fontes, L. P. T. L., Trichês, G., Pais, J. C., Pereira, P. A. A. & Minhoto, M. J. C. (2009).Laboratory performance of asphalt rubber mixtures. Proceedings asphalt rubber 2009 conference, Nanjing, China (pp. 369–385).
8. Geng L. T. · Journal of Building Materials · 2013 · 16 · 720
9. Gibson N. H. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2009 · 78 · 25
10. Kaloush K. E. · Performance evaluation of Arizona asphalt rubber mixtures using advanced dynamic material characterization tests · 2002
11. 10.1080/14680629.2013.83783710.1080/14680629.2013.837837 ↗
12. Pellinen T. K. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2002 · 71 · 281
13. 10.1080/14680629.2010.969031710.1080/14680629.2010.9690317 ↗
14. Putman B. J. · 2006
15. Ren R. B. · 2011
16. Scofield L. A. · 1989
17. 10.1080/14680629.2013.81253510.1080/14680629.2013.812535 ↗
18. Sousa J. B. · 2001
19. Transportation Research Board · 2004
20. Wang X. D. · 2008
21. Way G. B. · 2000
22. Wen X. J. · Journal of Building Materials · 2008 · 11 · 230
23. 10.1080/14680629.2013.81284510.1080/14680629.2013.812845 ↗
24. Zhu H. · 1999