A new proposal to assess shear fatigue resistance of asphalt pavement interfaces
Source abstract
Abstract
The degree of adherence between two bituminous layers can be assessed from shear tests carried out at constant displacement speed, which allow the shear strength and stiffness of the interface to be obtained, being usual to specify a minimum strength. But stronger bonds will be more stressed, which could negatively affect their fatigue behaviour. In this work, the shear fatigue behaviour of two interfaces of different stiffness has been analysed, based on a cyclic compression test, performed at controlled stress, using the test device B described in the NLT-382 standard, included in the draft of the European pre-norm prEN 12697-48. From these tests, fatigue laws for each type of interface have been obtained. These laws, combined with a calculation method developed by the authors, have made it possible to obtain the number of cycles that each interface would withstand, under certain load hypotheses.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya-BarcelonaTech, Barcelona, Spain
ARNÓ, Lleida, Spain
Funding
Centre for Industrial Technological Development
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Canestrari, F., Ferrotti, G., Lu, X., Millien, A., Partl, M. N., Petit, C. & Raab, C. (2013). Mechanical testing of interlayer bonding in asphalt pavements. Advances in interlaboratory testing and evaluation of bituminous materials (pp. 303–360). Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-5104-0_6 ↗
2. 10.1177/036119810519290010910.1177/0361198105192900109 ↗
3. Carr, A. G. (2001). The behaviour of layered pavement structures: The dynamic shear box. Project Rep., School of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Nottingham, Nottingham, U.K.
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.03010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.030 ↗
5. 10.1680/tran.2003.156.4.21110.1680/tran.2003.156.4.211 ↗
6. Crispino, M., Festa, B., Giannattasio, P. & Nicolosi, V. (1997). Evaluation of the interaction between the asphalt concrete layers by a new dynamic test. Proceedings of 8th Conference. International Society of Asphalt Pavements. Seattle.
7. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
8. Diakhaté, M. (2007). Fatigue et comportement des couches d’accrochage dans les structures de chaussées. Sciences de l’ingénieur. Université de Limoges.
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.06410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.064 ↗
10. 10.3141/1740-1810.3141/1740-18 ↗
11. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138908710.1080/14680629.2017.1389087 ↗
12. Kim, R., Tayebali, A., Guddati, M., Karshenas, A. & Cho, S. (2015). Surface layer bond stresses and strength. Final report submitted to North Carolina Department of Transportation. Office of Research (Research Projection No. HWY-2013-04).
13. Lesueur, D., Hanssens, J., Destrée, A. & de Visscher, J. (2013). Lait de chaux en protection des couches de collage: impact sur l’adhésion inter-couches. Actes du 22e congrès belge de la Route, Liège, pp. 11–13.
14. Lesueur, D., Leconte, P., Brosseaud, Y., Destrée, A., Mabille, C. & Ragot, G. (2015). Emploi de lait de chaux Asphacal® TC en protection des couches d’accrochage.
15. MCDHW. (2018). Manual of Contract Documents for highway works volume 2 notes for guidance on the specification for highway Works. https://www.standardsforhighways.co.uk/ha/standards/mchw/vol2/pdfs/2989370_MCHW_Vol2_NG900_v2.pdf
16. Mohammad, L. N. (2012). Optimization of Tack Coat for HMA placement. NCHRP Report 712. Transportation Research Board.
17. Muslich, S. (2010). Assessment of bond between asphalt layers. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Civil Engineering Nottingham Transport in Engineering Centre.
18. NLT-382/08 · 2008
19. Ortiz-Ripoll J. · 2021
20. Ortiz-Ripoll, J., Crisén, X., Lesueur, D. & Ruiz, F. (2018). Sistemas de protección y mejora de los riegos de adherencia. XIII Jornada Nacional ASEFMA. Madrid.
21. Ortiz-Ripoll, J., Miró, R. & Crisén Grau, X. (2020a). Resistencia a cortante de la unión entre capas bituminosas ¿Cuánta es necesaria? Jornada Nacional ASEFMA 2020.
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12037410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120374 ↗
23. 10.1007/978-3-319-76849-6_310.1007/978-3-319-76849-6_3 ↗
24. PG-3. (2014). Artículo 531 Riegos de adherencia. Ministerio de Fomento.
25. Pr EN-12697-48. 2021. Bituminous mixtures – Test methods – Part 48: interlayer bonding.
26. Proyecto SUPERBIT. (2020). https://www.arno.es/ca/arno-projectes/superbit-asphacal/.
27. 10.1201/9781351063265-3110.1201/9781351063265-31 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.011 ↗
29. Romanoschi, S. (1999). Characterization of pavement layer interfaces. Louisiana State University. LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses.
30. 10.3141/1778-1610.3141/1778-16 ↗
31. Romero, J., Ortiz, J. & Crisén, X. (2017). Aplicación de una lechada de cal diluida y estabilizada como protección de los riegos de adherencia. Congreso Gestión de Pavimentos. Asociación Española de la Carretera. Zaragoza.
32. Roque, R., Hernando, D., Park, B., Zou, J. & Waisome, J. (2017). Evaluation of asphalt pavement interface conditions for enhanced bond performance. Final Report. University of Florida. UF Project 118.906 submitted to The Florida Department of Transportation Research Center. Gainesville, EEUU.
33. Salam, Y. M. & Monismith, C. L. (1973). Fracture (Ultimate Strength) analyses of asphalt pavement layers resulting from traffic loading. Highway Research Record, No.466, Highway Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 127-138.
34. 10.3141/2590-0310.3141/2590-03 ↗
35. Shahin, M., Van Dam, T., Kirchner, K. & Blackmon, E. W. (1987). Consequence of layer separation on pavement performance. Report DOT/FAA/PM-86/48, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, D.C.
36. SHELL. (1998). BISAR 3.0 User Manual. Bitumen Business Group.
37. 10.5539/mas.v8n2p110.5539/mas.v8n2p1 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.01010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.010 ↗
39. Uzan J. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1978 · 47 · 495
40. Wellner, F. & Ascher, D. (2007). Untersuchungen zur Wirksamkeit des Haftverbundes und dessen Auswirkung auf die Lebensdauer von Asphaltbefestigungen. AIF-Forschungsbericht Projekt, (13589).
41. Wheat, M. (2007). Evaluation of bond strength at asphalt interfaces [M.S. thesis]. Kansas State University, KS.
42. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102969010.1080/14680629.2015.1029690 ↗
43. ZTV Asphalt-StB 07. (2007). Zusätzliche Technische Vertragsbedingungen und Richtlinien für den Bau von Verkehrsflächenbefestigungen aus Asphalt. Forschungsgesellschaft für Straßen- und Verkehrswesen Arbeitsgruppe Asphaltbauweisen. Ausgabe 2007.