journal article·2023-03-04

Effect of gradation, compaction and water content on crushed waste rocks strength

Antoine Laverdière, Shengpeng Hao, Thomas Pabst, Benoît Courcelles

Publisher page

Abstract

We reduced the size of the abstract to 170 words, but we cannot go lower without loosing meaning. We hope it will be ok like this --> Open-pit mining operations generate large volumes of waste rocks. It can be both economically and environmentally attractive to valorise waste rocks in mining infrastructures such as haul roads. However current practice usually consists of using waste rock directly, without any preparation or selection, thus frequently resulting in punctures, dust generation and low durability. The aim of this study was therefore to determine optimal geotechnical properties of crushed waste rocks for use in surface course layer. Crushed waste rocks were characterised in the laboratory. Their strength was evaluated using California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests. Several compaction energies were used, and he effect of maximum particle size, fines content, and dry density on the strength were assessed. Results showed that these parameters had a significant impact on the performance of the material. The strength was maximum for an optimum FC of around 10%, a high density and in the presence of coarser particles. Two regression models were also proposed to predict the CBR value of crushed waste rocks based on their physical properties.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Mineral Processing and Grinding

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil, Geological and Mining Engineering, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Research Institute on Mines and the Environment (RIME), Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Funding

FRQNT

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Aiban S. A. · 2002
2. Alias R. · Internationol Journal of Civil Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering · 2014 · 8 · 733
3. Anochie-Boateng, J., Paige-Green, P. & Mgangira, M. (2009). Evaluation of test methods forestimating resilient modulus of pavement geomaterials. Proceedings of the 28th Southern African Transport Conference (SATC 2009) (vol. 6, p.9).
4. ASTM C127-15 · 2015
5. ASTM C136/C136M-19 · 2019
6. ASTM C702/C702M-18 · 2018
7. ASTM D1557-12e1 · 2012
8. ASTM D1883-16 · 2016
9. ASTM D2434-19 · 2019
10. ASTM D2487-17e1 · 2017
11. ASTM D698-12e2 · 2012
12. ASTM D854-14 · 2014
13. Aubertin M. · 2002
14. Aubertin, M. (2013, August 11–15). Waste rock disposal to improve the geotechnical and geochemical stability of piles.Proceedings of the world mining congress, Montreal, Canada.
15. 10.1061/9780784480137.03410.1061/9780784480137.034 ↗
16. Ayodele A. · 2009
17. Azam, S., Wilson, G. W., Fredlund, D. G. & Van Zyl, D. (2009, October). Geotechnical characterization of mine waste rock.Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Alexandria, Egypt.
18. Barskale, R. D. & Itani, S. Y. (1989). Influence of aggregate shape on base behavior.Transportation Research Record, 1227, 173–182.
19. Bassey O. B. · Resource Environment · 2017 · 7 · 94
20. 10.1007/s10706-011-9479-910.1007/s10706-011-9479-9 ↗
21. 10.1139/L10-08310.1139/L10-083 ↗
22. Caicedoa, B. & Mendozaa, C. (2015, November 15–18). Geotechnical behaviour of unpaved roads: understanding the CBR test. From Fundamentals to Applications in Geotechnics: Proceedings of the 15th Pan–American Conference on Soil Mechanics andGeotechnical Engineering, Buenos Aires, Argentina (p. 95).
23. Dawson, A., Thom, N. & Paute, J. (1996).Mechanical characteristics of unbound granular materials as a function of condition(pp. 35–44). Gomes Correia.
24. 10.1007/s10706-018-0548-110.1007/s10706-018-0548-1 ↗
25. 10.1080/1029843080234276510.1080/10298430802342765 ↗
26. Gray J. · 1962
27. González Farias, I., Araujo, W. & Ruiz, G. (2018). Prediction of California Bearing Ratio fromIndex Properties of Soils Using Parametric and Non-parametric Models.Geotechnicaland Geological Engineering,36(6), 3485–3498.10.1007/s10706-018-0548-1 ↗
28. Hajiannia A. · 2016
29. Holtz, R. (1990). Compaction concepts. InGuide to earthwork compaction. State of the art report 8(Chapter 3, pp. 9–23).
30. 10.4038/engineer.v49i4.723410.4038/engineer.v49i4.7234 ↗
31. Islam, M. N., Siddika, A., Hossain, M. B., Rahman, A. & Asad, M. A. (2019).Effect of particle size on the shear strength behavior of sands. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.09079.
32. Janjua Z. S. · International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology · 2016 · 7 · 57
33. 10.1007/s10706-018-0604-x10.1007/s10706-018-0604-x ↗
34. Kaufman W. W. · 1977
35. Kumar C. V.
36. Lakshmi S. M. · Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2016 · 2810.11113/mjce.v28.15712 ↗
37. Laverdière A. · 2019
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:1(66)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:1(66) ↗
39. 10.1007/s10064-013-0482-710.1007/s10064-013-0482-7 ↗
40. Mallick, S. R. & Mishra, M. K. (2015).Fly ash – An alternative mine haul road construction material. LAP Lambert Academic. 120 p.
41. 10.1080/14680629.2017.134751710.1080/14680629.2017.1347517 ↗
42. Nguyen B. T. · World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Civil, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering · 2015 · 9 · 136
43. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.07.00510.1016/j.trgeo.2016.07.005 ↗
44. 10.1007/s00707-014-1127-z10.1007/s00707-014-1127-z ↗
45. Patel R. S. · 2010
46. 10.15623/ijret.2015.040202310.15623/ijret.2015.0402023 ↗
47. Rehman Z. · Technical Journal University of Engineering and Technology Taxila, Pakistan · 2017 · 22
48. 10.1061/JPEODX.000003210.1061/JPEODX.0000032 ↗
49. Seyhan, U., Tutumluer, E. & Yesilyurt, H. (2005). Anisotropic aggregate base inputs for mechanistic pavement analysis considering effects of moving wheel loads.Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,17(5), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) 0899–1561 (2005) 17:5(505)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:5(505) ↗
50. 10.9790/1684-1151263010.9790/1684-11512630 ↗
51. Siswosoebrotho B. I. · 2005
52. 10.1080/19386362.2017.137449510.1080/19386362.2017.1374495 ↗
53. Sukumaran B. · 2002
54. Taha S. · 2014
55. Tannant D. · 2001
56. Taskiran, T. (2010). Prediction of California bearing ratio (CBR) of fine grained soils by AImethods.Advances in Engineering Software,41(6), 886–892.10.1016/j.advengsoft.2010.01.003 ↗
57. Tardif-Drolet M. · Environmental Reviews · 2020 · 28 · 32
58. 10.1179/174328606X15513810.1179/174328606X155138 ↗
59. Thompson R. · 2019
60. Tutumluer E. · 2009
61. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000093110.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000931 ↗
62. Yoder E. J. · 1991