journal article·2023-02-01

Effect of bio-rejuvenator on recycled porous asphalt mixes

I. Holleran, D. J. Wilson, E. Masad, G. Holleran, E. Alrashydah

Publisher page

Abstract

The significant use of porous asphalt (PA) in many countries makes incorporating reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) from PA into a new PA mix a crucial activity. This paper investigates the effect of different percentages of a bio-rejuvenator (i.e. 0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) on volumetrics and mechanical properties of PA mixes containing 20% PA RAP. Ravelling resistance, moisture sensitivity, resilient modulus, and dynamic modulus (DM) were assessed. The mixes’ volumetric properties were driven by the RAP aggregate, not by the level of rejuvenation. The increase in the rejuvenation dosage resulted in improved PA performance. A balanced approach for selecting the optimum rejuvenation level was proposed. The DM results were corroborated with findings from the previously published research using atomic force microscopy (AFM), suggesting that AFM can predict the optimum level of rejuvenation for RAP and provide insights into the rejuvenation mechanisms at the nanoscale.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Auckland University, Auckland, New Zealand

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University at Qatar, Doha, Qatar

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas, San Antonio, USA

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/10298436.2020.179773610.1080/10298436.2020.1797736 ↗
2. 10.1080/1029843090273053910.1080/10298430902730539 ↗
3. 10.3141/2456-1610.3141/2456-16 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11986410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119864 ↗
5. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102970710.1080/14680629.2015.1029707 ↗
6. 10.1080/14680629.2019.158955710.1080/14680629.2019.1589557 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.27310.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.273 ↗
8. 10.1002/pen.2364910.1002/pen.23649 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.30510.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.305 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.02710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.027 ↗
11. Cooley, L. A., Brumfield, J. W., Mallick, R. B., Mogawer, W. S., Partl, M., Poulikakos, L. & Hicks, G. (2009). Construction and maintenance practices for permeable friction courses (NCHRP Report 640). TRB.
12. 10.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-110.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.04410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.044 ↗
14. Gabrawy T. · 2000 · 65
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000030710.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000307 ↗
16. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.05010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.050 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.05310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.053 ↗
19. Holleran, G., Holleran, I., Bearsley, S., Dubois, C. J. & Wilson, D. J. (2017, August 13–16). Epoxy asphalt for durability of open graded mixes: Part 1 performance approaches [Paper Presentation]. 17th AAPA International Flexible Pavements Conference 2017 “Roads of the Future, Embracing Disruption”, Melbourne, Australia.
20. 10.1080/14680629.2020.177140610.1080/14680629.2020.1771406 ↗
21. 10.1007/978-3-319-95792-0_810.1007/978-3-319-95792-0_8 ↗
22. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.09.00210.1016/j.fuproc.2015.09.002 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.09310.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.093 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.finel.2006.11.00410.1016/j.finel.2006.11.004 ↗
26. Moffatt M. · 2017
27. Mohammad, L. N., Daly, W. H., Negulescu, I. I., Wu, Z. & Daranga, C. (2004). Investigation of the use of recycled polymer-modified asphalt in asphaltic concrete pavements (No. FHWA/LA04/391). Louisiana Transportation Research Center.
28. Motomatsu, S., Takahashi, S., Uesaka, K. & Ouki, H. (2004). How the property and performance of polymer modified bitumen should be evaluated in porous asphalt mix? Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress Held Vienna, May 2004.
29. NZ Transport Agency. (2005). TNZ P/23:2005 performance based specification for hotmix asphalt wearing course surfacing. NZ Transport Agency. https://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/hotmix-asphalt-wearing-course-surfacing/
30. NZ Transport Agency. (2007). TNZ P/11:2007 specification for open graded porous asphalt. NZ Transport Agency. https://www.nzta.govt.nz/assets/resources/open-graded-porous-asphalt/docs/open-graded-porous-asphalt.pdf
31. NZ Transport Agency. (2014). NZTA M/10:2014 specification for dense graded and stone mastic asphalts. NZ Transport Agency.
32. NZ Transport Agency. (2019). NZTA M 01-A: 2019 specification for performance-graded asphalt binder. NZ Transport Agency. https://www.nzta.govt.nz/assets/resources/asphalt-binders/Asphalt-binders-specification.pdf
33. 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.04310.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.043 ↗
34. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.000012710.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000127 ↗
36. 10.3141/2474-0810.3141/2474-08 ↗
37. 10.1520/JTE2012007010.1520/JTE20120070 ↗
38. Reinke G. · 2009 · 86
39. Ruiz A. · Transportation Research Record · 1990 · 1265 · 87
40. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000193410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001934 ↗
41. 10.1080/14680629.2019.166127610.1080/14680629.2019.1661276 ↗
42. Stroup-Gardiner M. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1996 · 65 · 321
43. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.08.00710.1016/j.fuproc.2009.08.007 ↗
44. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126675710.1080/14680629.2016.1266757 ↗
45. Tran N. H. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2006 · 75 · 321
46. Turner, P., Taylor, A. & Tran, P. N. (2015). Laboratory evaluation of SYLVAROADTM RP 1000 rejuvenator. NCAT Report 15-03. https://www.eng.auburn.edu/research/centers/ncat/files/technical-reports/rep15-03.pdf
47. 10.17226/2517310.17226/25173 ↗
48. Witczak M. W. · 2007
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.12210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.122 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.04.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.04.008 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.07.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.07.007 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.013 ↗