journal article·2022-06-03

Investigation of recycled asphalt mixtures in Missouri: laboratory, field, and ILLI-TC modelling

Behnam Jahangiri, Punyaslok Rath, Hamed Majidifard, Loreto Urra, William G. Buttlar

Publisher page

Abstract

This study investigates the lab and field performance of four asphalt mixtures placed in Missouri, USA, containing reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) and recycled asphalt shingles (RAS). Laboratory tests including disk-shaped compact tension fracture (DC(T)), indirect tension (IDT) creep and strength, Illinois flexibility index (I-FIT), indirect tensile cracking test (IDEAL-CT), and the Hamburg wheel tracking test (HWTT) were conducted on field cores and plant-produced, lab-compacted (PPLC) samples. The DC(T), I-FIT, and IDEAL-CT tests showed that all of the mixtures exhibit brittle behaviour and have high cracking potential, while the HWTT indicated that rutting does not appear to be a concern with these mixes. Statistical analysis was performed to examine the capability of the performance tests investigated to distinguish between mixes. The DC(T) exhibited the best ability to distinguish between mixtures, while IDT strength displayed the least ability. Simulations using the ILLI-TC software were conducted to further explore the low temperature cracking behaviour of the mixes. Finally, field data collected using an automatic road analyzer (ARAN) was analyzed to further assess the laboratory performance tests.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, USA

Funding

Missouri Department of Transportation · University of Missouri-Columbia

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Al-Qadi I. · Illinois Center for Transportation · 2015 · 1 · 209
2. 10.1177/036119812091242510.1177/0361198120912425 ↗
3. 10.1177/036119811989961110.1177/0361198119899611 ↗
4. Anderson R. M. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2011 · 80
5. ASTM D7313 · ASTM International Standards · 2013 · 2
6. ASTM D8225. (2019). Standard test method for determination of cracking tolerance index of asphalt mixture using the indirect tensile cracking test at. April, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1520/D8225-19.Copyright
7. 10.1177/036119811987566610.1177/0361198119875666 ↗
8. 10.3141/2208-0910.3141/2208-09 ↗
9. 10.1177/036119811879327610.1177/0361198118793276 ↗
10. Braham A. F. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2009 · 78
11. Buttlar W. G. · 2017
12. Buttlar W. G. · Asphalt Mixtures · 2018 · 51
13. 10.3141/1630-0410.3141/1630-04 ↗
14. Buttlar, W. G., Urra-Contreras, L., Jahangiri, B., Rath, P. & Majidifard, H. (2020). Support for balanced asphalt mixture design specification development in Missouri, No. cmr 20-010.
15. Cascione A. A. · AAPT · 2011 · 80 · 377
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.02.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.02.005 ↗
17. 10.1080/14680629.2018.143114810.1080/14680629.2018.1431148 ↗
18. 10.1080/14680629.2013.81283810.1080/14680629.2013.812838 ↗
19. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102969710.1080/14680629.2015.1029697 ↗
20. Gillen, S. (2007). Ground tire rubber (GTR) asphalt pavement demonstration project.
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000075710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000757 ↗
22. 10.3141/2631-0110.3141/2631-01 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000127710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001277 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.00210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.002 ↗
25. 10.1177/036119811982563810.1177/0361198119825638 ↗
26. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
27. 10.3141/2631-1710.3141/2631-17 ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000148110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001481 ↗
29. Lytton, R. L., Uzan, J., Fernando, E. G., Roque, R., Hiltunen, D. & Stoffels, S. M. (1993). Development and validation of performance prediction models and specifications for asphalt binders and paving mixes. SHRP-A-357. 552.
30. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.11.08110.1016/j.measurement.2018.11.081 ↗
31. 10.1080/14680629.2012.68584310.1080/14680629.2012.685843 ↗
32. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138909210.1080/14680629.2017.1389092 ↗
33. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
34. NCHRP. (2004). Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Final report, NCHRP project 1–37A. In Transportation research board, national research council.
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.14410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.144 ↗
36. 10.3141/2575-1410.3141/2575-14 ↗
37. 10.3390/su1106179210.3390/su11061792 ↗
38. Richardson, D. N. & Lusher, S. M. (2008). Determination of creep compliance and tensile strength of hot-mix asphalt for wearing courses in Missouri. In Missouri department of transportation (Issue April).
39. Roque R. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1992 · 61 · 304
40. 10.1080/10298436.2020.173083810.1080/10298436.2020.1730838 ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:5(376)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:5(376) ↗
42. 10.1177/001448510505320510.1177/0014485105053205 ↗
43. Walker D. · 2001
44. 10.3141/2296-0510.3141/2296-05 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.jtte.2019.09.00410.1016/j.jtte.2019.09.004 ↗
46. 10.1061/9780784413005.10010.1061/9780784413005.100 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.11410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.114 ↗
48. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000120210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001202 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.16810.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.168 ↗
50. Zhou F. · 2018
51. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138908210.1080/14680629.2017.1389082 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.09310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.093 ↗