An analysis of theoretical and empirical relationships between two asphalt binder cracking parameters
Source abstract
Abstract
Since the adoption of the Performance Grading criteria, researchers and agencies have dedicated efforts toward supplementing the existing parameters with better indicators of asphalt binder cracking susceptibility. This study seeks to evaluate the relationship between ΔTc and the Glover-Rowe parameter, two such parameters. This study contains three parts: (i) a fundamental examination of the relationship between the indicators, (ii) an empirical study of theseparameters based on an array of data from the existing literature, and (iii) an examination of the basic principles underlying the mechanisms of ductility and nonlinearity in polymer-modified asphalt related to these parameters. The results indicate that the parameters are not fundamentally related, but have some relationship to cracking, reinforcing the importance of considering time and temperature. Additionally, the parameters do diverge in their relationship. Finally, fundamental properties of polymer-modified asphalts reveal the need for considering nonlinear and damaged binder behaviour, and reexamining binder ductility’s importance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Transport Systems and Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
Funding
University of Illinois
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Anderson, D. A., Christensen, D., Bahia, H., Dongré, R., Sharma, M. G., Antle, C. & Button, J. (1994). Binder characterization and evaluation volume 3: Physical characterization (Tech. Rep.). Strategic Highway Research Program A-369.
2. 10.3141/1766-0710.3141/1766-07 ↗
3. Anderson M. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2011 · 80 · 615
4. 10.3141/1875-0110.3141/1875-01 ↗
5. Asphalt Institute (2019). State of the knowledge: Use of the delta Tc parameter to characterize asphalt binder behavior (pp. 1–64).
6. Bahia H. U. · Transportation Research Record · 1995 · 1488
7. Bahia, H. U., Hanson, D., Zeng, M., Zhai, H., Khatfi, M. & Anderson, R. (2001). NCHRP 459: Characterization of modified asphalt binders in superpave mix design (Tech. Rep.).
8. 10.3141/1810-0510.3141/1810-05 ↗
9. Chang, W. V. (1994). Applications of acoustic emission to study the cohesive and adhesive strength of asphalt (Tech. Rep.). SHRP A-682.
10. Christensen D. W. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1992 · 61
11. Clark R. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1958 · 27 · 196
12. 10.1080/14680629.2009.969023610.1080/14680629.2009.9690236 ↗
13. D'Angelo, J. A. (2018). Asphalt binders and aging 20 hr or 40 hr pav. In Proceedings of the binder expert task group meeting, Fall River, MA, USA (pp. 9–10).
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2007)7:2(149)10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2007)7:2(149) ↗
15. Doyle, P. (1958). Cracking characteristics of asphalt cement. In Proceedings of the association of asphalt paving technologists (Vol. 27, pp. 581–597).
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.11110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.111 ↗
17. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000013810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000138 ↗
18. Elwardany M. · Journal of the Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2019
19. Glover, C. J., Davison, R. R., Domke, C. H., Ruan, Y., Juristyarini, P., Knorr, D. B. & Jung, S. H. (2005). Development of a new method for assessing asphalt binder durability with field validation (Tech. Rep.).
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.31410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.314 ↗
21. 10.1080/10298436.2017.127949010.1080/10298436.2017.1279490 ↗
22. Hajj, R., Filonzi, A. & Bhasin, A. (2019). Improving the performance-graded asphalt binder specification (Tech. Rep.). University of Texas at Austin. Center for Transportation Research.
23. 10.3141/2632-0510.3141/2632-05 ↗
24. 10.1080/10298436.2019.165274210.1080/10298436.2019.1652742 ↗
25. 10.1201/9780429457791-4710.1201/9780429457791-47 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.14610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.146 ↗
27. 10.1023/A:102234571340910.1023/A:1022345713409 ↗
28. Hintz, C. (2012). Understanding mechanisms leading to asphalt binder fatigue [PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison].
29. 10.3141/2370-0210.3141/2370-02 ↗
30. 10.3141/2207-1310.3141/2207-13 ↗
31. Johnson, C. (2010). Estimating asphalt binder fatigue resistance using an accelerated test method [PhD thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison].
32. Johnson, C., Wen, H. & Bahia, H. (2009). Practical application of viscoelastic continuum damage theory to asphalt binder fatigue characterization. In Asphalt paving technology: Association of asphalt paving technologists – Proceedings of the technical sessions. DESTech Publications.
33. Kandhal, P. S. (1977). Low-temperature ductility in relation to pavement performance. In C. R. Marek (Ed.), ASTM STP 628: Low-temperature properties of bituminous materials and compacted bituminous paving mixtures, ASTM International (pp. 95–106).10.1520/STP27096S ↗
34. Kandhal P. S. · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 1975 · 554 · 1
35. 10.1007/978-94-007-4566-7_4410.1007/978-94-007-4566-7_44 ↗
36. 10.1080/14680629.2019.158815010.1080/14680629.2019.1588150 ↗
37. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126675410.1080/14680629.2016.1266754 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.08.01010.1016/j.ijprt.2016.08.010 ↗
39. 10.1080/10298436.2019.169467710.1080/10298436.2019.1694677 ↗
40. 10.3141/1766-0510.3141/1766-05 ↗
41. Marek, C. R. & Herrin, M. (1968). Tensile behavior and failure characteristics of asphalt cements in thin films. In Association of asphalt paving technologists proceedings (pp. 1–54). DESTech Publications.
42. McDaniel, R. S. & Shah, A. (2019). Investigation of delta Tc for implementation in indiana.10.5703/1288284316923 ↗
43. McGennis, R. B., Shuler, S. & Bahia, H. U. (1994, July). Background of superpave asphalt binder test methods (Tech. Rep.). Federal Highway Administration, Office of Technology Applications.
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.01710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.017 ↗
45. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
46. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000160610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001606 ↗
47. 10.1007/s11043-013-9222-410.1007/s11043-013-9222-4 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.cocis.2006.09.00110.1016/j.cocis.2006.09.001 ↗
49. 10.1007/s11340-010-9434-310.1007/s11340-010-9434-3 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.11.06010.1016/j.fuel.2012.11.060 ↗
51. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
52. Rowe, G. M. (2016). ΔTc-some thoughts on the historical development [Paper presentation]. Asphalt Binder ETG Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT.
53. 10.1520/JTE2013024510.1520/JTE20130245 ↗
54. 10.1002/jctb.501005120510.1002/jctb.5010051205 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.02010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.020 ↗
56. 10.1002/polc.507026011210.1002/polc.5070260112 ↗
57. 10.3141/2179-0310.3141/2179-03 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.004 ↗
59. 10.3141/2370-1110.3141/2370-11 ↗
60. Wen H. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2010 · 38
61. 10.1177/036119812091589410.1177/0361198120915894 ↗
62. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000062510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000625 ↗