Sensitivity analysis of a new dynamic modulus (|E*|) model for asphalt mixtures
Source abstract
Abstract
Asphalt pavement designers have been using the dynamic modulus (| E*|) as a fundamental parameter to reflect the hot-mix asphalt (HMA) performance, and since | E*| is considered as an essential input in the new AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG), many models were developed for evaluating and/or predicting this property for HMA. This article focuses on the verification of a newly developed model to predict | E*| by utilising robust sensitivity analyses through tornado plots and extreme tail analyses, which are used to identify the relative importance of the input variables on the predicted | E*|. Results showed that the binder dynamic shear modulus (| G*|) has the most significant effect, followed by the air void content, on the predicted | E*|, and both properties contributed largely to the extreme predicted values.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO · Standard method of test for determining dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt concrete mixtures · 2004
2. Abbas A. · International Journal of Geomechanics · 2007 · 7 · 13110.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2007)7:2(131) ↗
3. Aboudi J. · 1991
4. Abu Abdo A. · 2008
5. Abu Abdo A. · International Journal of Pavement Engineering · 2010 · 11 · 52910.1080/10298436.2010.488728 ↗
6. Abu Abdo A. · Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport · 2011 · 165 · 1510.1680/tran.10.00023 ↗
7. Bari J. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologist · 2006 · 75 · 381
8. Chou · Journal of Transportation Engineering · 1990 · 116 · 60210.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1990)116:5(602) ↗
9. Christensen D. W. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologist · 2003 · 72 · 97
10. Dai Q. · Journal of Engineering Mechanics · 2007 · 133 · 16310.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:2(163) ↗
11. Eschenbach T. G. · The Engineering Economist · 2006 · 51 · 19510.1080/00137910600695676 ↗
12. Haider, S. W., Salama, H. K., Buch, N. and Chatti, K. Significant M-EPDG design inputs for jointed plain concrete pavements in Michigan. MAIREPAV5 – Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Pavements and Technological Control. Park City, UT
13. Hashin Z. · Journal of Applied Mechanics · 1965 · 32 · 63010.1115/1.3627270 ↗
14. Killingsworth B. M. · Transportation Research Record · 1995 · 111
15. Li N. · Transportation Research Record · 1997 · 7010.3141/1592-09 ↗
16. Miller J. S. · Transportation Research Record · 1983 · 27
17. Reuss A. · 1929
18. Saltelli A. · 2000
19. Shook J. F. · Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1969 · 38 · 140
20. Sues R. H. · 1993 · 76
21. Thyagarajan S. · 2009
22. Vose D. · 1997
23. Witczak, M. W. 1978. “Development of regression model for asphalt concrete modulus for use in MS-1 study”. Research Report. College Park, MD: University of Maryland
24. Witczak M. W. · Transportation Research Record · 1996 · 1510.3141/1540-03 ↗
25. Wroth C. P. · 1988 · 1 · 303