Dynamic shakedown limits for flexible pavement with cross-anisotropic materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Shakedown solution is widely used to analyse the elastic-plastic behaviours of structures in pavement design. Previous studies only concerned the shakedown theorem under traffic loads for an isotropic material, although the material is usually anisotropic. This paper firstly proposed a numerical analysis for anisotropic materials under moving traffic load, based on Melan’s lower-bound shakedown theory. An anisotropic Finite Element–Infinite Element (FE–IE) model is used to calculate the dynamic stresses in the anisotropic material subjected to moving traffic loads with different speeds. Then, the shakedown limits for an anisotropic half-space and a two-layered pavement system are determined, respectively. It is found that the Rayleigh wave speed of the soil has a significant effect on the shakedown limits. For a cross-anisotropic half-space, the shakedown limits mainly depend on the stiffness ratio of the two layers and the Poisson’s ratio only has a small effect, although both of them significantly affect the Rayleigh wave speed. Furthermore, the shakedown limit increases with increasing cohesion ratio until it reaches a maximum value, and it gets rid of the control of shakedown condition when the moving speed exceeds the Rayleigh wave speed. For a two-layered anisotropic system, the results are similar to those in an isotropic system. Failure tends to occur on the top of the second layer instead of the first layer when the speed of moving load or the anisotropic Young’s modulus ratio increases, together with the decrease of shakedown limit.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Railway Engineering and Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Geotechnical Engineering & Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, People's Republic of China
School of Engineering and Information Technology, University of New South Wales, Canberra, Australia
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Achenbach J. D. · 1980
2. 10.1080/14680629.2005.969000010.1080/14680629.2005.9690000 ↗
3. 10.1139/cgj-2014-034110.1139/cgj-2014-0341 ↗
4. Ceradini G. · Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division · 1980 · 106 · 48110.1061/JMCEA3.0002600 ↗
5. 10.1520/GTJ10718J10.1520/GTJ10718J ↗
6. 10.1080/14680629.2005.968999710.1080/14680629.2005.9689997 ↗
7. 10.1002/nag.161017030310.1002/nag.1610170303 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.12.00310.1016/j.soildyn.2012.12.003 ↗
9. 10.1080/14680629.2009.969018610.1080/14680629.2009.9690186 ↗
10. Graff K. F. · 1975
11. 10.1016/j.sandf.2016.04.00910.1016/j.sandf.2016.04.009 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10035-017-0717-610.1007/s10035-017-0717-6 ↗
13. Houlsby G. T. · Géotechnique · 1983 · 33 · 160
14. Jardine R. J. · Géotechnique · 2015 · 52 · 727
15. 10.1680/geot.1997.47.3.50910.1680/geot.1997.47.3.509 ↗
16. 10.1080/14680629.2010.969031310.1080/14680629.2010.9690313 ↗
17. Koiter W. T. · 1960 · 1 · 165
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000025010.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000250 ↗
19. 10.1680/geot.2000.50.2.10910.1680/geot.2000.50.2.109 ↗
20. Melan E. · SitzberAkademia Wissenschaft, Wien · 1936 · 195
21. 10.1126/science.756992410.1126/science.7569924 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.05.04610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.05.046 ↗
23. 10.1016/0022-5096(85)90033-X10.1016/0022-5096(85)90033-X ↗
24. 10.1080/10298436.2017.129325910.1080/10298436.2017.1293259 ↗
25. 10.1080/14680629.2005.968999910.1080/14680629.2005.9689999 ↗
26. Schwartz, C. W., Li, R., Kim, S. H., Ceylan, H. & Gopalakrishnan, K. (2011).Sensitivity evaluation of MEPDG performance prediction (Final report of NCHRP 1–47). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1984)110:1(1)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1984)110:1(1) ↗
28. 10.1080/14680629.2013.81431810.1080/14680629.2013.814318 ↗
29. 10.1002/nag.220710.1002/nag.2207 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2004)130:5(665)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2004)130:5(665) ↗
31. 10.1080/14680629.2005.968999810.1080/14680629.2005.9689998 ↗
32. 10.1680/geot.9.P.07210.1680/geot.9.P.072 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.08.01110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.08.011 ↗
34. Zhou, R. Y., Qian, J. G. & Huang, M. S. (2014). Dynamic stress responses to traffic moving loading in the saturated poroelastic ground. Advances in Soil Dynamics and Foundation Engineering, Geotechnical Special Publication, 240, ASCE, 117–125.10.1061/9780784413425.013 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.06.01210.1016/j.soildyn.2017.06.012 ↗