Effect of tie bars on the field performance of full-depth repair on concrete pavement
Source abstract
Abstract
Many Full-Depth Repairs (FDRs) have suffered recurring failures and thus there is a critical need to enhance the understanding of the failure mechanisms. Three premature failure projects were investigated. Recurring pumping, settlement and cracks are strongly related to poor Load Transfer Efficiency (LTE), which was obtained with a falling weight deflectometer. Cores were taken to examine the condition of the tie bars. The results from highway IH20 reveal that recurring failures occurred on the same slabs that had poor anchoring to the adjacent slabs. There was zero resistance on the pull-out test before the concrete was poured in 2009. Low LTEs of less than 40% were measured in 2010. Cores taken in 2010 revealed significant surrounding voids at the tie bar, indicating that the epoxy did not ever develop sufficient anchoring strength. The deflections at the joints were 3-5 times higher than those at the center slab. Similar failure mechanisms were observed on the IH35 and US75 projects that had poor LTE. There was a good correlation between lower LTE, higher deflections, visible pumping, and settlement. Tie bars were not properly anchored in the IH35 pavement. Tie bars were ruptured in the US75 pavement. Because of these ineffective tie bars, pumping and settlement were prevalent. In contrast, a good performing FDR on SH78 also was investigated. All LTEs had remained above 90% even after 16 years of trafficking. It was concluded that when LTE exceeds 90%, it lead to a successful FDR. By comparison, if was concluded when LTE was less than 40%, premature failures occurred. Additional data is needed to verify what will be the performance when the LTE is between 40% and 90%. A threshold value can be established for acceptable LTE value. The superior performance of the SH78 pavement suggests that proper procedures are critical when anchoring the tie bars. Pull-out tests should be performed to ensure that proper anchoring and sufficient strength is developed on the tie bar before concrete is placed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. 1993. “American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)”. Washington, DC
2. ACPA. 1995. “Guidelines for Full-Depth Repair, TB002.02P”. Skokie, Illinois: American Concrete Pavement Association.
3. Caltrans · 2004
4. Chen D. · ASTM Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2008 · 36 · 11910.1520/JTE101362 ↗
5. Chen D. · Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE · 2009 · 23 · 44010.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000050 ↗
6. Chen D. · KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering · 2011 · 15 · 9110.1007/s12205-011-0887-4 ↗
7. Huang Y. · 1993
8. Mallela J. · 2009
9. Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide · 2008
10. Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Highways · 2004
11. Snyder M. · Transportation Research Record · 1990 · 35
12. Stringer M. · 2008
13. Strauss, P. J., Perrie, B. D., Plessis, L. du. and Rossmann, D. Load transfer through aggregate interlock: Crack width, aggregate type and performance. 8th International Conference on Concrete Pavements. August14–18, Colorado. pp.372–391. Colorado: Springs.
14. TxDOT · 2004
15. TxDOT · 2008
16. 10.1002/978047017291910.1002/9780470172919 ↗