journal article·2021-08-03Open access

Modelling and permanent deformation analysis of low-density polyethylene (PE)-modified bitumens and asphalts

Matheus David Inocente Domingos, Adalberto Leandro Faxina, Liedi Légi Bariani Bernucci

Abstract

The present investigation aimed at evaluating the permanent deformation responses of bitumens modified with low-density polyethylene - either with or without polyphosphoric acid (bitumen+PE and bitumen+PE+PPA) - and by considering bitumen tests (MSCR – multiple stress creep and recovery), rheological models and asphalt tests (FN – flow number). The formulations were graded as PG 76-xx and the standardised MSCR tests were conducted at 64, 70 and 76°C. The bitumen+PE+PPA showed a higher resistance to permanent deformation than the bitumen+PE according to MSCR and FN tests in a general context, even though none of the formulations may be assumed as overly stress sensitive (Superpave® parameter lower than 75% in all cases), neither they depicted high levels of elasticity due to their small per cent recoveries (all lower than 25%). It was also hypothesised that the contributions of PE and PPA on the increases in the stiffness of the bitumen+PE+PPA were made individually.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Academic Department of Civil Construction, Federal University of Technology – Parana, Curitiba, Brazil

Department of Transportation Engineering, Sao Carlos School of Engineering, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos, Brazil

Department of Transportation Engineering, Polytechnic School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Funding

CAPES · Funda??o de Amparo ? Pesquisa do Estado de S?o Paulo

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás e Biocombustíveis. (2005). Regulamento Técnico No. 03/2005, Resolução ANP No. 19, de 11 de julho de 2005 [Legislação]. Retrieved from http://legislacao.anp.gov.br/?path=legislacao-anp/resol-anp/2005/julho&item=ranp-19-2005
2. 10.1080/14680629.2013.86881910.1080/14680629.2013.868819 ↗
3. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2009). Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder, AASHTO Designation: M 320-09.
4. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2014). Standard method of test for multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR), AASHTO Designation: T 350-14.
5. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2009). Standard viscosity-temperature chart for asphalts, ASTM Designation: D2493/D2493M-09.
6. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2012a). Standard test method for effect of heat and air on a moving film of asphalt (rolling thin-film oven test), ASTM Designation: D2872-12.
7. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2012b). Standard test method for viscosity determination of asphalt at elevated temperatures using a rotational viscometer. ASTM Designation: D4402/D4402M-12.
8. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2015). Standard test method for multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer, ASTM Designation: D7405-15.
9. 10.3844/ajassp.2007.390.39610.3844/ajassp.2007.390.396 ↗
10. Bahia H. U. · 2001
11. Bahia H. U. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2001 · 70 · 442
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.21610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.216 ↗
13. 10.3141/1766-0610.3141/1766-06 ↗
14. 10.1361/10599499977034674710.1361/105994999770346747 ↗
15. Clyne T. R. · Transportation Research Circular · 2012 · 160 · 115
16. Cunha, M. B., Zegarra, J. E. & Fernandes Jr, J. L. (2007). Revisão da seleção do grau de desempenho (PG) de ligantes asfálticos por estado no Brasil [Revision of the selection of performance-graded (PG) asphalt binders for each state in Brazil]. Anais do 21° Congresso Nacional de Pesquisa e Ensino em Transportes. Rio de Janeiro: Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Ensino em Transportes.
17. 10.1080/14680629.2009.969023610.1080/14680629.2009.9690236 ↗
18. D’Angelo J. · Transportation Research Circular · 2010 · 147 · 1
19. 10.3141/2126-0910.3141/2126-09 ↗
20. D’Angelo J. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2007 · 76 · 123
21. 10.1617/s11527-011-9777-y10.1617/s11527-011-9777-y ↗
22. 10.1080/14680629.2006.969002410.1080/14680629.2006.9690024 ↗
23. Departamento de Estradas de Rodagem do Estado de São Paulo. (2005). Concreto asfáltico, Designação: ET-DE-P00/027.
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000136410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001364 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.17110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.171 ↗
26. Dreessen S. · 2009 · 2 · 971
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.11110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.111 ↗
28. 10.3141/2179-0610.3141/2179-06 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.02110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.021 ↗
30. Gierhart, D. (2013, February). Multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR): why it should be implemented. Paper presented at the Louisiana Transportation Conference, Baton Rouge, LA.
31. Golalipour, A. (2011). Modification of multiple stress creep and recovery test procedure and usage in specification (Master’s thesis). University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000180310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001803 ↗
33. 10.1007/s42947-019-0077-110.1007/s42947-019-0077-1 ↗
34. 10.1080/14680629.2015.106353310.1080/14680629.2015.1063533 ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0247322110.1007/BF02473221 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cis.2008.08.01110.1016/j.cis.2008.08.011 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.05210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.052 ↗
38. Liu Y. · 2009 · 26
39. 10.1177/036119810519010010710.1177/0361198105190100107 ↗
40. 10.1080/14680629.2012.65709610.1080/14680629.2012.657096 ↗
41. 10.4237/transportes.v21i3.68510.4237/transportes.v21i3.685 ↗
42. 10.1080/14680629.2004.968997510.1080/14680629.2004.9689975 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.cis.2015.07.01010.1016/j.cis.2015.07.010 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.cocis.2006.09.00110.1016/j.cocis.2006.09.001 ↗
45. 10.3141/1639-0910.3141/1639-09 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.05810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.058 ↗
47. Roberts F. L. · 1996
48. 10.3141/2181-0910.3141/2181-09 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.07810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.078 ↗
50. 10.1617/s11527-012-0006-010.1617/s11527-012-0006-0 ↗
51. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:5(357)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:5(357) ↗
52. 10.1515/arh-2004-001710.1515/arh-2004-0017 ↗
53. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000215310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002153 ↗
54. Tabatabaee, N. & Teymourpour, P. (2010). Effect of modification on rut susceptibility of asphalt binders and mixtures. Proceedings of the International Conference on asphalt pavements. Nagoya. Zagreb: HAD.
55. Wasage T. L. J. · 2009 · 2 · 989
56. 10.1080/10298436.2011.57355710.1080/10298436.2011.573557 ↗
57. 10.1080/14680629.2016.121273010.1080/14680629.2016.1212730 ↗
58. Witczak M. W. · 2002
59. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.04410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.044 ↗