journal article·2019-04-30

Thermo-hydro-mechanical behaviour of cold reclaimed asphalt aggregates without binder addition

Laura Gaillard, Cyrille Chazallon, Pierre Hornych, Juan Carlos Quezada, Christiane Raab

Road Materials and Pavement Design· Volume 20· Issue sup1
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper details a cold recycling evaluation of 100% reclaimed asphalt aggregates without any binder addition. In this context, a series of triaxial laboratory tests was performed. Monotonic triaxial tests were conducted to determine failure resistance at 20°C, 50°C and with a specimen preheated at 50°C then tested at 20°C. Repeated Load Triaxial (RLT) tests were performed to analyse the permanent and resilient strains at 20°C, at three frequencies and with two water contents. It is found that increasing temperature causes a drop of failure resistance while cohesion is increased. RLT tests reveal that higher water content implies higher strains, as well that water content presents a higher impact on resilient behaviour than low frequencies. Finally, the non-linear elastic Boyce model was used to describe the resilient strains. Total stress and effective stress calibrations were performed with a measurement of the initial suction. Eventually, these effective stress calibrations were performed with one set of parameters.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

ICUBE, UMR 7357, CNRS, INSA de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

IFSTTAR, LAMES, Bouguenais, France

EMPA, Dübendorf, Switzerland

Funding

ERDF - INTERREG V

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1139/cgj-2012-040610.1139/cgj-2012-0406 ↗
2. 10.1680/geot.1963.13.3.17710.1680/geot.1963.13.3.177 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.06810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.068 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.04.00410.1016/j.trgeo.2016.04.004 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.05310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.053 ↗
6. 10.1080/1029843070155119310.1080/10298430701551193 ↗
7. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126172610.1080/14680629.2016.1261726 ↗
8. 10.1080/14680629.2014.90813610.1080/14680629.2014.908136 ↗
9. Ho X. N. · Road Materials and Pavement Design · 2014 · 16 · 842
10. Jing P. · Road Materials and Pavement Design · 2016 · 19 · 298
11. 10.1080/10298436.2015.112627110.1080/10298436.2015.1126271 ↗
12. 10.1080/14680629.2016.121350010.1080/14680629.2016.1213500 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.02.01310.1016/j.compgeo.2011.02.013 ↗
14. 10.1155/2010/56592410.1155/2010/565924 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.004 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.17610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.176 ↗
17. 10.3141/1832-2210.3141/1832-22 ↗
18. 10.1080/10298436.2015.106600710.1080/10298436.2015.1066007 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.01610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.016 ↗