journal article·2010-01

Bimodular Analysis of Hot-Mix Asphalt

Samer W. Katicha, Gerardo W. Flintsch, Amara Loulizi

Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, the bimodular (different tensile and compressive moduli) stress distribution in the IDT specimen is determined for different compressive to tensile modulus ratios. The difference between the modulus calculated from the IDT test assuming Hondros' linear elastic stress distribution, and the compressive and tensile moduli is then obtained. The results show that this difference is significantly smaller for the case of the compressive modulus compared to the case of the tensile modulus. Even for a compressive to tensile modulus ratio of 2, the difference from the compressive modulus is small enough (5 to 10%) to be indistinguishable from experimental testing variation. This would explain why IDT experimental results tend to agree with uniaxial compression test results. It however contradicts the assumption that the IDT creep compliance test can approximate the uniaxial tension creep compliance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Tribology and Wear Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. Ambartsumyan S. A. · Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSR Mekh · 1965 · 77
2. Ambartsumyan S. A. · Mechanics of Solids · 1969 · 48
3. 10.1115/1.344355010.1115/1.3443550 ↗
4. Bonaquist R. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1986 · 55 · 419
5. Buttlar W. G. · Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1996 · 65 · 99
6. Christensen D. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1998 · 67 · 458
7. Christensen D. W. · 2004
8. 10.1007/BF0004341710.1007/BF00043417 ↗
9. 10.1017/CBO978051156571710.1017/CBO9780511565717 ↗
10. Frocht M. M. · 1948
11. 10.1007/BF0004172910.1007/BF00041729 ↗
12. Hargett E. R. · Highway research board · 1961 · 430
13. Hondros G. · Australian Journal of Applied Science · 1959 · 10 · 243
14. 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.00610.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.006 ↗
15. Huber M. T. · Der Bauingenieur · 1923 · 4 · 354
16. 10.2514/3.729710.2514/3.7297 ↗
17. Kallas B. F. · Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1970 · 1
18. Katicha S. W. · 2007
19. Kennedy T. W. · Transportation Research Record · 1977 · 12
20. Khanal P. P. · Transportation Research Record · 1995 · 144
21. 10.3141/1891-1910.3141/1891-19 ↗
22. Klisch S. M. · Transactions of the ASME · 2007 · 129 · 250
23. Lytton R. L. · 1993
24. Mamlouk M. S. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation ASTM · 2002 · 43210.1520/JTE12334J ↗
25. Monismith C. L. · 1962 · 476
26. 10.1177/00219983680020041210.1177/002199836800200412 ↗
27. Roque R. · Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1992 · 61 · 304
28. 10.1115/1.289943610.1115/1.2899436 ↗
29. Saint-Venant , B. 1864.Notes to the 3rd édition of Navier's summary lessons on the resistance of solid bodies175Paris
30. Secor K. E. · Highway Research Record · 1965 · 84
31. Shapiro G. S. · Mechanics of Solids · 1966 · 85
32. 10.1093/qjmam/30.4.44910.1093/qjmam/30.4.449 ↗
33. Tabaddor F. · 1979 · 1
34. Timoshenko S. P. · 1930
35. Timoshenko S. P. · 1982
36. 10.3141/1929-2810.3141/1929-28 ↗
37. 10.1007/BF0057102210.1007/BF00571022 ↗
38. Von Quintus H. L. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1982 · 51 · 35
39. Washizu K. · 1982
40. Wen H. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2003 · 51 · 50710.1520/JTE12378J ↗