Effect of type of aggregate on permanent deformation of bituminous concrete mixes
Source abstract
Abstract
The physical properties and performance of hot mix asphalt are governed by the properties of the aggregate, properties of the asphalt binder and asphalt–aggregate interactions. The study is aimed to compare the behaviour of bitumen containing various type of modifiers [styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) and ethylene-vinyl-acetate (EVA)] and aggregates (acidic and basic characters) for preparing hot mix asphalt on permanent deformation. Rutting and static creep tests were performed on various mixes to evaluate permanent deformation. Dynamic shear rheometer was used to determine the rheological properties and hence rutting parameter (G*/Sinδ). The results indicate that polymer modification increased rutting resistance. Moreover, samples prepared with EVA are more resistant to deformation compared to those prepared with SBS. Mixes consisting of quartzite aggregate are likely to deform more compared to marble mixes, both for modified and unmodified bituminous mixes, but the recovery of quartzite mixes on removal of load is also more.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:5(379)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:5(379) ↗
2. Bahia H. U. · Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2001 · 70 · 442
3. Behbahani H. · Journal of Applied Science Research · 2008 · 4 · 96
4. 10.1080/14680629.2004.968998610.1080/14680629.2004.9689986 ↗
5. Bolk, H. J. N. A. (1981). “The Creep Test”, SCW Record 5. Study Centre for Road Construction, Arnhem.
6. Brown S. F. · Proceedings of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1984 · 53 · 415
7. Collins J. H. · Proceedings of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1991 · 60 · 43
8. Huang Y. H. · 1993
9. Isacsson U. · Proceedings of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1999 · 68 · 35
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.01910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.019 ↗
11. Kumar P. · Journal of Indian Roads Congress · 2011 · 39 · 21
12. 10.1080/1029843050049514710.1080/10298430500495147 ↗
13. 10.1080/14680629.2001.968989610.1080/14680629.2001.9689896 ↗
14. 10.3141/1661-1310.3141/1661-13 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:1(51)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:1(51) ↗
16. Mertens E. W. · Highway Research Board Proceedings · 1959 · 38 · 386
17. Monismith C. L. · Journal of Association Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1988 · 57 · 414
18. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.03.01010.1016/j.buildenv.2007.03.010 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:2(131)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1999)11:2(131) ↗
20. Petersen, R. E., Anderson, D. A. & Button, J. W. (1994).Binder characterization and evaluation. Washington, DC: SHRP-A-369, National Research Council, Physical Characterization, 3.
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:6(500)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:6(500) ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:5(448)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:5(448) ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.013 ↗
24. Shanmugasundram V. · Journal of Indian Highways · 2005 · 33 · 123
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:2(136)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2002)128:2(136) ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.08.01810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.08.018 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.014 ↗
28. White, T. D., Haddock, J. E., Hand, A. J. & Fang, H. (2002).Contribution of pavement structural layers to rutting of hot mix asphalt pavements. NCHRP Rep. 468. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.