journal article·2026-01-31

Performance evaluation and cost optimisation of short panel concrete pavements as an alternative to traditional jointed plain concrete pavement

Ravi Kumar Meena, Rameshwar J. Vishwakarma

Publisher page

Abstract

This study evaluates the structural and economic performance of short panel concrete pavement (SPCP) compared with conventional jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP, 4.5 m x 3.5 m). Reducing slab thickness lowers construction cost but increases flexural stress and deflection in standard JPCP. Therefore, this research investigates the effect of reducing panel dimensions, defining such configurations as SPCP. Square panels ranging from 500 mm to 1500 mm with thicknesses between 50 mm and 200 mm were analysed under combined wheel and temperature loading using a three-dimensional finite element model. Flexural stress, deflection, load transfer efficiency (LTE), and lifecycle cost were evaluated for subgrade strengths from 40 to 300 MPa/m. The results indicate that a 1000 mm x 1000 mm panel with a thickness of 175 mm provides an optimal balance between structural performance and cost, achieving approximately 20% cost savings compared to standard JPCP.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Engineering and Material Science Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Malaviya National Institute of Technology

Funding

Ministry of Education, Government of India

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Chattaraj, R., & Pandey, B. B. (2014). Short-panelled concrete pavement in a built-up area. Indian Highways, 42(1), 5–12.
2. DSR. (2023). Central Public Works Department (Vol. 1). A Government of India Publication.
3. 10.1007/s40996-021-00595-x10.1007/s40996-021-00595-x ↗
4. 10.1007/s11367-012-0450-710.1007/s11367-012-0450-7 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1992)118:6(745)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1992)118:6(745) ↗
6. IRC:15. (2017). Code of practice for construction of jointed plain concrete pavements. Indian Road Congress.
7. IRC:58. (2015). Guidelines for the design of Plain Jointed rigid Pavements for highways. Indian Road Congress.
8. IRC:62. (2015). Construction of cement concrete roads for low-volume roads. Indian Road Congress.
9. IRC: SP: 30. (2009). Manual on economic evaluation of highway projects in India. Indian Road Congress.
10. IRC: SP: 76. (2015). Guidelines for conventional and thin white topping. Indian Road Congress.
11. Jundhare, D. R., Khare, K. C., & Jain, R. K. (2011). Edge stresses and deflections of unbonded conventional white topping overlay. Indian Concrete Journal, 85(3), 35.
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.06610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.066 ↗
13. Lee, Y. H., Yen, S. T., Lee, C. T., Bair, J. H., & Lee, Y. M. (1997). Development of new stress analysis and thickness design procedures for jointed concrete pavements. In D. R. Thompson & J. L. Peña (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Concrete Pavements (pp. 18–21). Purdue University.
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.11410.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.114 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.11310.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.113 ↗
16. 10.1007/s40890-019-0080-x10.1007/s40890-019-0080-x ↗
17. Maitra, S. R., Reddy, K. S., Ramchandra, L. S., & Pandey, B. B. (2018). Numerical analysis of short paneled concrete pavement. Indian Highways, 46(8), 11–19.
18. 10.1080/14680629.2025.250560610.1080/14680629.2025.2505606 ↗
19. Pandey, B. B. (2005). Warping stresses in concrete pavements - A re-examination. Bulletin of Highway Research, Highway Research Board and Indian Road Congress, 73, 49–58.
20. 10.1080/10298436.2011.57513410.1080/10298436.2011.575134 ↗
21. Rowe, G. M., Chang, K. G., & Tabrizi, K. (1997). Use of the falling weight deflectometer in conjunction with the photographic survey methods in concrete pavement restoration programs. Infrastructure Condition Assessment: Art, Science, and Practice, 326–335.
22. 10.1016/J.PROENG.2013.03.08010.1016/J.PROENG.2013.03.080 ↗
23. Sheehan M. J. Tarr S. M. & Tayabji S. D. (2004). Instrumentation and field testing of thin white topping pavement in Colorado and revision of the existing Colorado thin white topping procedure. CDOT-DTD-R-2004-12.
24. Sultana S. & Hossain M. (2010). Thin white topping for green highways. In Proceedings of Green Streets and Highways 2010: An Interactive Conference on the State of the Art and How to Achieve Sustainable Outcomes (pp. 438–448).10.1061/41148(389)36 ↗
25. Tabbert T. R. & Zachary L. (2006). Verification of the white topping thickness design procedure for asphalt concrete overlaid Portland cement concrete pavements.
26. Times of India. (2024). JDA: JDA allocates ₹52 crore for urgent road repairs ahead of Diwali in Jaipur. Jaipur News. Retrieved November 19 2024 from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/jaipur/jda-allocates-52-crore-for-urgent-road-repairs-ahead-of-diwali-in-jaipur/articleshow/113830767.cms
27. 10.12989/sem.2017.61.3.38910.12989/sem.2017.61.3.389 ↗
28. 10.1007/s13369-018-3308-x10.1007/s13369-018-3308-x ↗
29. Westergaard, H. M. (1926). Stresses in concrete pavements computed by theoretical analysis. Public Roads.
30. Yoder, E. J., & Witczak, M. W. (1991). Principles of pavement design. John Wiley & Sons.