journal article·2026-04-03

Influence of recycling agent on binders of varying ages and effects on subsequent aging

L. Abinaya, K. Lakshmi Roja, Wubulikasimu Yiming, M. R. Nivitha, Eyad Masad, J. Murali Krishnan

Publisher page

Abstract

Understanding the influence of recycling agents (RA) on different aged binders and their impact on subsequent aging mechanisms is vital for the effective recycling of aged binders and identifying threshold RA dosages. The present study aims to investigate the interaction effects of RA through an integrated framework by analysing chemical characteristics using Saturates, Aromatics, and Resins with Asphaltene determinator (SAR-AD) method and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, while corroborating these findings through microstructural changes captured using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM). Recycled blends prepared with binders aged to three extents and varying RA dosages were tested in unaged and long-term aged conditions. Results indicate that RA increases lighter hydrocarbons, balances asphaltene-maltene polarity, and promotes non-covalent interactions, with the quantum of influences reducing as RA dosage and RAP binder age increase. These mechanisms contribute to softening and dispersion effects, with the dispersion persisting with subsequent aging, indicating that RA alters the aromatisation process. The findings reveal that beyond a threshold RA dosage, its primary effect is softening the binder, while its impact on functional groups and dispersion becomes marginal.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Materials Engineering and Processing · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Indian Institute of Technology Madras

Hamad Bin Khalifa University

Texas A&M University at Qatar

PSG College of Technology

Funding

Ministry of Human Resource Development

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1520/JTE2022022910.1520/JTE20220229 ↗
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000391010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003910 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12984310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129843 ↗
4. Abinaya L. Thirumalavenkatesh M. Nivitha M. R. & Krishnan J. M. (2023). Influence of aging on the rheological response of bitumen. In Advances in Materials and Pavement Performance Prediction III. CRC Press.
5. 10.3390/pr1104122010.3390/pr11041220 ↗
6. 10.1080/102984304200019856810.1080/1029843042000198568 ↗
7. 10.1080/14680629.2021.198497810.1080/14680629.2021.1984978 ↗
8. Alexander J. & Dulebo M. (2023). The fundamentals of AFM probe selection. Retrieved February 1 2024 from https://youtu.be/sNd9QRfdIZM?si=JvGj6kvC4KZd9IKb.
9. 10.1080/10298436.2024.244910510.1080/10298436.2024.2449105 ↗
10. ASTM D2172 (2017). Standard Test Methods for Quantitative Extraction of Asphalt Binder from Asphalt Mixtures. American Society for Testing and Materials ASTM International West Conshohocken PA.
11. ASTM D5404 (2017). Standard Practice for Recovery of Asphalt from Solution Using the Rotary Evaporator. American Society for Testing and Materials ASTM International West Conshohocken PA.
12. ASTM D6373 (2021). Standard Specification for Performance Graded Asphalt Binder. American Society for Testing and Materials ASTM International West Conshohocken PA.
13. ASTM D7175 (2015). Standard Test Method for Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer. American Society for Testing and Materials ASTM International West Conshohocken PA.
14. 10.1080/14680629.2013.79908610.1080/14680629.2013.799086 ↗
15. Bonaquist R. Adams J. J. & Anderson D. A. (2021). Asphalt binder aging methods to accurately reflect mixture aging (NCHRP Research Report 967). Transportation Research Board.10.17226/26089 ↗
16. 10.1021/ef400952b10.1021/ef400952b ↗
17. Boysen R. B. & Schabron J. F. (2015). Automated HPLC SAR-AD separation fundamental properties of asphalts and modified asphalts III (Technical Report FP 01. Contract No. DTFH61- 07-D-00005). Western Research Institute.
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.06010.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.060 ↗
19. 10.1007/s12046-020-1268-910.1007/s12046-020-1268-9 ↗
20. DeBock L. Piérard N. Vansteenkiste S. & Vanelstraete A. (2020). Categorisation and analysis of rejuvenators for asphalt recycling. Retrieved June 20 2022 from https://brrc.be/sites/default/files/2020-05/ dossier21_en.pdf.
21. 10.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-110.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1 ↗
22. 10.1080/14680629.2019.162844110.1080/14680629.2019.1628441 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000335210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003352 ↗
24. 10.1617/s11527-018-1262-410.1617/s11527-018-1262-4 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000316710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003167 ↗
26. 10.1617/s11527-017-1059-x10.1617/s11527-017-1059-x ↗
27. 10.1080/14680629.2020.177140610.1080/14680629.2020.1771406 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12971110.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129711 ↗
29. 10.1080/14680629.2024.243184210.1080/14680629.2024.2431842 ↗
30. IS 73 (2018). Paving Bitumen – Specification. Indian Standards Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) New Delhi India.
31. Kim Y. R. Castorena C. Elwardany M. Rad F. Y. Underwood B. S. Gundla A. Gudipudi P. P. Farrar M. J. & Glaser R. R. (2018). Long-term aging of asphalt mixtures for performance testing and prediction (NCHRP Research Report 09-54). Transportation Research Board.10.17226/24959 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.12685610.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126856 ↗
33. 10.3390/suschem201001210.3390/suschem2010012 ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000301610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003016 ↗
35. 10.1016/0168-9002(89)91258-810.1016/0168-9002(89)91258-8 ↗
36. Martin A. E. Kaseer F. Mercado E. A. Bajaj A. Cucalon L. G. Yin F. Chowdhury A. Epps J. Glover C. & Hajj E. Y. (2020). Evaluating the effects of recycling agents on asphalt mixtures with high RAS and RAP binder ratios (NCHRP Report 927). National Cooperative Highway Research Program and Transportation Research Board.
37. Masad, E., & Roja, K. L. (2024). Assessment of aging behaviour of reclaimed asphalt binders: Multi-scale mechanical and microstructural characterisation. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 26(4), 1–21.
38. 10.1111/jmi.2006.221.issue-110.1111/jmi.2006.221.issue-1 ↗
39. MATLAB (2022). Version 9.13.0 (R2022b). The MathWorks Inc.
40. NanoScope (2022). NanoScope analysis (Version 3). Bruker Corporation.
41. 10.1080/10298436.2015.100723010.1080/10298436.2015.1007230 ↗
42. 10.1007/s12046-019-1107-z10.1007/s12046-019-1107-z ↗
43. 10.1007/978-3-030-34196-1_510.1007/978-3-030-34196-1_5 ↗
44. 10.1177/036119812090911010.1177/0361198120909110 ↗
45. Origin (2024). OriginLab Corporation. https://www.originlab.com/doc/Origin-Help/Deconvolution
46. Petersen J. C. (2009). A review of the fundamentals of asphalt oxidation: Chemical physicochemical physical property and durability relationships (Transportation Research Circular E-C140). Transportation Research Board.
47. Peterson J. C. (1984). Chemical composition of asphalt as related to asphalt durability: State of the art (No. FHWA/RD-84/047). Western Research Institute and Federal Highway Administration.
48. 10.1080/14680629.2021.202068110.1080/14680629.2021.2020681 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12070910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120709 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.12455010.1016/j.fuel.2022.124550 ↗
51. Roberts, F. L., Kandhal, P. S., Brown, E. R., Lee, D. -Y., & Kennedy, T. W. (1996). Hot mix asphalt materials, mixture design and construction. National Asphalt Pavement Association Research and Education Foundation.
52. 10.1177/036119811985145810.1177/0361198119851458 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11968910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119689 ↗
54. 10.1007/s40890-020-0096-210.1007/s40890-020-0096-2 ↗
55. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:5(376)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:5(376) ↗
56. Sias J. E Dave E. V. & Zhang R. (2022). Use of recycling agents in asphalt concrete mixtures (NCHRP Research Report 586). Transportation Research Board.10.17226/26601 ↗
57. Smith, B. C. (2017). The carbonyl group, Part I: Introduction. Spectroscopy, 32(9), 31–36.
58. 10.1021/ef030030y10.1021/ef030030y ↗
59. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13552410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135524 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.06.03810.1016/j.fuel.2014.06.038 ↗
61. 10.1080/14680629.2023.218100510.1080/14680629.2023.2181005 ↗
62. 10.1177/0361198122108822510.1177/03611981221088225 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.02210.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.022 ↗