Comparison of open-graded, dense-graded and semi-porous asphalt mixtures for motorway wearing courses based on Wehner-Schulze tests and photogrammetry
Source abstract
Abstract
Achieving sustainable mobility necessarily involves improving road safety. When open-graded (or porous) asphalt mixtures are used as wearing course in road pavements, they can drastically reduce the number of accidents thanks to their water drainage capability and improved visibility for drivers during rainy weather. However, in practice, the field skid resistance of such pavements measured in wet conditions is often lower than that of dense-graded wearing courses, which seems counterintuitive and needs further investigation. Within this context, this study compared the surface properties of over 30 asphalt mixtures typically employed for wearing courses in Italian motorway pavements, which were collected for quality control during the construction works. The mixtures differed in terms of type (open-graded, dense-graded, semi-porous), composition (i.e. mix design, aggregate origin and polymer modified bitumen supplier) as well as production date. The skid resistance of laboratory-compacted slabs was evaluated at increasing polishing levels with the Wehner-Schulze (WS) machine. The surface texture of selected slabs was assessed through a photogrammetric reconstruction, thus obtaining the surface profile characteristics exactly along the trajectory investigated in the WS tests. On average, the friction values of open-graded mixtures were found to be lower than dense-graded mixtures by more than 20% due to the lower effective contact area between the WS measurement sliding blocks and the sample surface (percentage of contact = 15÷25% vs. 65÷80%), which can determine a reduction of the skid resistance contributions due to adhesion. For the same type of mixture, higher friction values were observed in the presence of coarse aggregates with high Polished Stone Value (PSV) and/or in the case of lower air void content.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Università Politecnica delle Marche
Movyon S.p.A.
Funding
Sustainable Mobility Center · Centro Nazionale per la Mobilità Sostenibile – MOST · Spoke 7 · Connected Networks and Smart Infrastructure · Work Package 4 · National Recovery and Resilience Plan · Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza · European Union – NextGenerationEU · Movyon S.p.A · Autostrade per l’Italia Group
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/14328917.2020.174114510.1080/14328917.2020.1741145 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.03810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.09.038 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jtte.2024.04.00610.1016/j.jtte.2024.04.006 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.32110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.321 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.95510.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.955 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.wear.2008.11.01210.1016/j.wear.2008.11.012 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.wear.2006.12.08610.1016/j.wear.2006.12.086 ↗
8. 10.1080/14680629.2023.219172310.1080/14680629.2023.2191723 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jreng.2021.12.00110.1016/j.jreng.2021.12.001 ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:4(420)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:4(420) ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.18510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.185 ↗
12. Hall, J. W., Smith, K. L., Titus-Glover, L., Wambold, J. C., Yager, T. J., & Rado, Z. (2009). Guide for pavement friction – contractor’s final report for National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 01-43. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
13. King, W. B., Kabir, M. S., Cooper, S. B., & Abadie, C. (2013). Evaluation of Open Graded Friction Course (OGFC) mixtures. Louisiana Transportation Research Center. Report FHWA/LA.13/513.
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.00210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.002 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.10210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.102 ↗
16. 10.1155/2021/273305410.1155/2021/2733054 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jsr.2006.04.00610.1016/j.jsr.2006.04.006 ↗
18. 10.1080/14680629.2010.969034310.1080/14680629.2010.9690343 ↗
19. Mariani E. Ingrassia L. P. Angeloni R. Gorgoglione L. Clini P. & Canestrari F. (2024). Interpretation of pavement skid resistance based on the advanced analysis of surface texture. Proceedings of the AIIT 4th International Conference Rome September 19-20 2024 (TIS ROMA 2024).
20. 10.1080/10298436.2021.202078410.1080/10298436.2021.2020784 ↗
21. 10.3390/eng402009110.3390/eng4020091 ↗
22. Sayers, M. W., & Karamihas, S. M. (1998). The little book of profiling: Basic information about measuring and interpreting road profiles. University of Michigan, Transportation Research Institute.
23. 10.1080/14680629.2013.77929810.1080/14680629.2013.779298 ↗
24. Wallman C.-G. & Åström H. (2001). Friction measurement methods and the correlation between road friction and traffic safety – A literature review. Report of the Swedish National Road and Traffic Institute.
25. 10.1596/978-1-4648-1254-510.1596/978-1-4648-1254-5 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11775910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117759 ↗
27. 10.1080/14680629.2014.94420510.1080/14680629.2014.944205 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11987810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119878 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.asej.2023.10228110.1016/j.asej.2023.102281 ↗