journal article·2025-03-06

Influence of inlet concentration, UV intensity, and relative humidity on NO x degradation in photocatalytic asphalt pavement

Ali Zain UI Abadeen, Seyed Reza Omranian, Johan Blom, Sam Van Den Bergh, Haopeng Zhang, Sammy W. Verbruggen, Cedric Vuye

Publisher page

Abstract

Road transportation significantly contributes to urban NOx pollution, with concentrations reaching 100–1000 ppb near high-traffic areas. This study provided a comparative assessment of TiO2 incorporation methods (mixing and surface coating) in asphalt pavement, while examining the effects of environmental factors on NOx and NO degradation. While asphalt mixtures modified with 4% TiO2 bitumen showed minimal activity (<1%), surface-coated specimens achieved substantial NOx reduction (22.7%). Performance analysis revealed NOx degradation decreased (23% to 7%) with increasing pollutant concentration (100–1000 ppb) and improved (9% to 23%) with higher UV intensity (5–15 W/m2) at 35% relative humidity. Low humidity around 35% RH performed better for improving NOx degradation. Response surface methodology identified optimal parameters (15 W/m2 UV, 100 ppb NO, 35% RH) achieving maximum degradation desirability. The coating maintained performance over five cycles (23% NO, 10% NOx removal), though traffic wear resistance requires investigation for practical implementation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Antwerp

Funding

University of Antwerp · IMproved Photocatalytic Activity of asphalt pavements with modified TiO2 Nano Technology · BOF INFRA Purchase of an Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester · BOF INFRA Purchase of a gyratory compactor for asphalt samples

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.10079510.1016/j.apmt.2020.100795 ↗
2. 10.3141/2290-2110.3141/2290-21 ↗
3. 10.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2014.7(4).27310.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2014.7(4).273 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.04210.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.042 ↗
5. 10.3390/MA1317365910.3390/MA13173659 ↗
6. 10.3390/environments812013710.3390/environments8120137 ↗
7. 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2012.09.00510.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2012.09.005 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.06210.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.062 ↗
9. 10.1007/s41062-023-01060-610.1007/s41062-023-01060-6 ↗
10. 10.1080/10962247.2015.104052410.1080/10962247.2015.1040524 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12317810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123178 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.09.01610.1016/j.buildenv.2011.09.016 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1515540710.3390/ma15155407 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000024810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000248 ↗
15. Festy B. (2013). Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution - REVIHAAP Project. Technical Report. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe 2013. In Pollution Atmospherique (Issue 219).
16. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.07.02210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.07.022 ↗
17. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000040810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000408 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.04.01010.1016/j.buildenv.2009.04.010 ↗
19. 10.1006/jcat.1995.127010.1006/jcat.1995.1270 ↗
20. 10.1039/d3ea00034f10.1039/d3ea00034f ↗
21. 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.10145710.1016/j.uclim.2023.101457 ↗
22. 10.1038/nature1371710.1038/nature13717 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000147810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001478 ↗
24. 10.1088/2053-1591/ac8a3f10.1088/2053-1591/ac8a3f ↗
25. 10.1016/j.trd.2023.10360510.1016/j.trd.2023.103605 ↗
26. 10.5194/essd-12-3413-202010.5194/essd-12-3413-2020 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.11273410.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112734 ↗
28. 10.1021/es00005a01310.1021/es00005a013 ↗
29. 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.12885910.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.128859 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.07810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.078 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.micron.2021.10314910.1016/j.micron.2021.103149 ↗
32. 10.1617/s11527-022-01981-110.1617/s11527-022-01981-1 ↗
33. 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.05.07510.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.05.075 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10098-014-0793-910.1007/s10098-014-0793-9 ↗
35. 10.3390/coatings911069610.3390/coatings9110696 ↗
36. 10.3390/catal1011133610.3390/catal10111336 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12383510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123835 ↗
38. 10.1136/bmj.n190410.1136/bmj.n1904 ↗
39. 10.1098/rsos.17059010.1098/rsos.170590 ↗
40. 10.1080/10473289.2000.1046404110.1080/10473289.2000.10464041 ↗
41. 10.1007/s12205-021-0654-010.1007/s12205-021-0654-0 ↗
42. 10.1016/J.WEAR.2017.04.00410.1016/J.WEAR.2017.04.004 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.07110.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.071 ↗
44. 10.1007/978-3-319-95789-0_810.1007/978-3-319-95789-0_8 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.05310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.053 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.002 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.09.00410.1016/j.apcatb.2009.09.004 ↗
48. 10.1088/1757-899X/579/1/01204610.1088/1757-899X/579/1/012046 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.07410.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.074 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.trd.2021.10310110.1016/j.trd.2021.103101 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.00910.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.009 ↗