Influence of inlet concentration, UV intensity, and relative humidity on NO x degradation in photocatalytic asphalt pavement
Source abstract
Abstract
Road transportation significantly contributes to urban NOx pollution, with concentrations reaching 100–1000 ppb near high-traffic areas. This study provided a comparative assessment of TiO2 incorporation methods (mixing and surface coating) in asphalt pavement, while examining the effects of environmental factors on NOx and NO degradation. While asphalt mixtures modified with 4% TiO2 bitumen showed minimal activity (<1%), surface-coated specimens achieved substantial NOx reduction (22.7%). Performance analysis revealed NOx degradation decreased (23% to 7%) with increasing pollutant concentration (100–1000 ppb) and improved (9% to 23%) with higher UV intensity (5–15 W/m2) at 35% relative humidity. Low humidity around 35% RH performed better for improving NOx degradation. Response surface methodology identified optimal parameters (15 W/m2 UV, 100 ppb NO, 35% RH) achieving maximum degradation desirability. The coating maintained performance over five cycles (23% NO, 10% NOx removal), though traffic wear resistance requires investigation for practical implementation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Antwerp
Funding
University of Antwerp · IMproved Photocatalytic Activity of asphalt pavements with modified TiO2 Nano Technology · BOF INFRA Purchase of an Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester · BOF INFRA Purchase of a gyratory compactor for asphalt samples
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.10079510.1016/j.apmt.2020.100795 ↗
2. 10.3141/2290-2110.3141/2290-21 ↗
3. 10.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2014.7(4).27310.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2014.7(4).273 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.04210.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.042 ↗
5. 10.3390/MA1317365910.3390/MA13173659 ↗
6. 10.3390/environments812013710.3390/environments8120137 ↗
7. 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2012.09.00510.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2012.09.005 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.06210.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.09.062 ↗
9. 10.1007/s41062-023-01060-610.1007/s41062-023-01060-6 ↗
10. 10.1080/10962247.2015.104052410.1080/10962247.2015.1040524 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12317810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123178 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.09.01610.1016/j.buildenv.2011.09.016 ↗
13. 10.3390/ma1515540710.3390/ma15155407 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000024810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000248 ↗
15. Festy B. (2013). Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution - REVIHAAP Project. Technical Report. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe 2013. In Pollution Atmospherique (Issue 219).
16. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.07.02210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.07.022 ↗
17. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000040810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000408 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.04.01010.1016/j.buildenv.2009.04.010 ↗
19. 10.1006/jcat.1995.127010.1006/jcat.1995.1270 ↗
20. 10.1039/d3ea00034f10.1039/d3ea00034f ↗
21. 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.10145710.1016/j.uclim.2023.101457 ↗
22. 10.1038/nature1371710.1038/nature13717 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000147810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001478 ↗
24. 10.1088/2053-1591/ac8a3f10.1088/2053-1591/ac8a3f ↗
25. 10.1016/j.trd.2023.10360510.1016/j.trd.2023.103605 ↗
26. 10.5194/essd-12-3413-202010.5194/essd-12-3413-2020 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.11273410.1016/j.jphotochem.2020.112734 ↗
28. 10.1021/es00005a01310.1021/es00005a013 ↗
29. 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.12885910.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.128859 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.07810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.078 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.micron.2021.10314910.1016/j.micron.2021.103149 ↗
32. 10.1617/s11527-022-01981-110.1617/s11527-022-01981-1 ↗
33. 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.05.07510.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.05.075 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10098-014-0793-910.1007/s10098-014-0793-9 ↗
35. 10.3390/coatings911069610.3390/coatings9110696 ↗
36. 10.3390/catal1011133610.3390/catal10111336 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12383510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123835 ↗
38. 10.1136/bmj.n190410.1136/bmj.n1904 ↗
39. 10.1098/rsos.17059010.1098/rsos.170590 ↗
40. 10.1080/10473289.2000.1046404110.1080/10473289.2000.10464041 ↗
41. 10.1007/s12205-021-0654-010.1007/s12205-021-0654-0 ↗
42. 10.1016/J.WEAR.2017.04.00410.1016/J.WEAR.2017.04.004 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.07110.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.071 ↗
44. 10.1007/978-3-319-95789-0_810.1007/978-3-319-95789-0_8 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.05310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.053 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2018.11.002 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.09.00410.1016/j.apcatb.2009.09.004 ↗
48. 10.1088/1757-899X/579/1/01204610.1088/1757-899X/579/1/012046 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.07410.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.074 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.trd.2021.10310110.1016/j.trd.2021.103101 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.00910.1016/j.apcatb.2017.06.009 ↗