journal article·2024-12-13

Impact of accuracy of weigh-in-motion data for pavement analysis and design: influence of temperature variations

Dawid Rys, Przemysław Więckowski, Monika Wasilewska, Cezary Dołęga

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of temperature on WIM-collected data using the steering axle load spectrum (SALS) and two datasets. The first dataset, provided by the WIM system operator, contains detailed raw data, while the second, supplied by the road authority, includes less detailed information but covers 46 stations with various sensor types and configurations: single-line bending plates and two-line quartz piezoelectric sensors. A new methodology and parameter, the Spectral Bias Index, were introduced to evaluate WIM data accuracy. This approach effectively identifies stations operating correctly or incorrectly, with bias percentages of 6% for correct stations and 15% for incorrect ones. These biases significantly influence equivalency factors for pavement design, ranging from 1.28 to 2.52, particularly increasing for stations using single-line bending plate sensors. Pavement design datasets should span at least a year to reduce temperature effects and be checked for accuracy using the proposed steering axle load spectrum approach.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Transport Systems and Technology · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Transportation Engineering, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdańsk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland

Department of Acoustics, Multimedia and Signal Processing, Faculty of Electronics, Photonics and Microsystems, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland

Neurosoft, Sp. z o. o., Wroclaw, Poland

Funding

National Center for Research and Development · Neurosoft Sp. z o. o. · National Centre for Research and Development in Poland

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. (2004). Guide for mechanistic – Empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures MEPDG.
2. AASHTO Guide for Pavement Design 1993. (1993). American association of state and highway transportation officials.
3. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11404210.1016/j.measurement.2023.114042 ↗
4. Atkinson V. M. Merrill D. & Thom N. (2005). Pavement wear factors TRL Published Project Report PPR 066.
5. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11349410.1016/j.measurement.2023.113494 ↗
6. 10.3390/s2011304910.3390/s20113049 ↗
7. 10.3390/s2123804610.3390/s21238046 ↗
8. Burnos, P., Gajda, J., Sroka, R., Wasilewska, M., & Dolega, C. (2021b). Precyzyjne systemy dynamicznego ważenia pojazdów samochodowych. Drogownictwo, 7–8, 191–198. (in Polish).
9. COST 334. (2001). Effects of wide single tyres and dual tyres: final report of the action. version 29.
10. 10.3390/s2322929010.3390/s23229290 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000033510.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000335 ↗
12. 10.1177/036119812093797710.1177/0361198120937977 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-3-319-42797-310.1007/978-3-319-42797-3 ↗
14. Jacob B. O’Brien E. & Jehaes S. (2002). COST 323: Weigh-in-motion of road vehicles - final report. Appendix 1 European WIM Specification. http://www.is-wim.org/doc/wim_eu_specs_cost323.pdf
15. Judycki, J. (2006). Podstawy określania współczynników równoważności obciążenia osi do projektowania nawierzchni drogowych. Drogi i Mosty, 2, 55–92.
16. 10.1080/14680629.2010.969026610.1080/14680629.2010.9690266 ↗
17. LCPC. (1998). Catalogue des structures types de chaussées neuves. SETRA.
18. 10.1016/j.trc.2013.08.01210.1016/j.trc.2013.08.012 ↗
19. 10.1201/9781003027362-1610.1201/9781003027362-16 ↗
20. 10.1007/s42947-023-00291-110.1007/s42947-023-00291-1 ↗
21. 10.1177/0361198122109740210.1177/03611981221097402 ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:1(1)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:1(1) ↗
23. 10.1080/14680629.2019.168700610.1080/14680629.2019.1687006 ↗
24. 10.3390/s1915327210.3390/s19153272 ↗
25. 10.1080/10298436.2021.191549210.1080/10298436.2021.1915492 ↗
26. 10.1080/14680629.2021.202361310.1080/14680629.2021.2023613 ↗
27. 10.7409/rabdim.019.01910.7409/rabdim.019.019 ↗