journal article·2025-10-03

Real-time edge AI algorithm for road defects detection

Shuang Li, Yunfei Liu, Jiashun Zhou, Ruipeng Han, Xueyi Kong, Renjie Xu

Road Materials and Pavement Design· Volume 26· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Vision-based automated road defects detection schemes are significant for highway maintenance and road condition grade assessment. This paper was dedicated to achieving a refined trade-off between accuracy and efficiency through neural network optimisation. Specifically, we proposed a novel lightweight model, RT-RDD (Real-Time Road Defects Detection), which integrated low-level extraction and high-level semantic feature extraction for road defects detection. This was achieved by designing a more advantageous backbone structure and a lighter neck structure. Additionally, key improvements include optimising the feature extraction strategy and evaluation. The RT-RDD model surpasses existing models in terms of mean Average Precision (mAP), with only a marginal reduction after quantisation. Compared to foundation model, our algorithm improves mAP (0.5:0.95) by 4.2%. In addition, we propose a quantisation and compression strategy that effectively reduces the overall model size by approximately one-third. Notably, this reduction in size only results in a minor decrease of 1.3% in mAP (0.5:0.95). Testing on NVIDIA Jetson Xavier NX Development Board Kit demonstrates the model achieves a detection speed of 58 frames per second (FPS) with enhanced precision. These improvements make it ideal for deployment in practical road maintenance scenarios.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Advanced Neural Network Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Nanjing Forestry University

McMaster University

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/BigData50022.2020.937779010.1109/BigData50022.2020.9377790 ↗
2. 10.1155/2022/922121110.1155/2022/9221211 ↗
3. Bochkovskiy A. Wang C.-Y. & Liao H.-Y. M. (2020). Yolov4: Optimal speed and accuracy of object detection.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10934.
4. Chen N. Li Q. Ning J. Wang Q. & Liao N. (2022). Improving the lightweight object detection method for YOLOv5. Paper presented at the International Workshop of Advanced Manufacturing and Automation.10.1007/978-981-19-9338-1_4 ↗
5. 10.3934/mbe.201940210.3934/mbe.2019402 ↗
6. Cui C. Gao T. Wei S. Du Y. Guo R. Dong S. Lu B. Zhou Y. Lv X. & Liu Q. (2021). PP-LCNet: A lightweight CPU convolutional neural network.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.15099.
7. 10.1016/j.ins.2023.03.03810.1016/j.ins.2023.03.038 ↗
8. 10.37936/ecti-cit.2022164.24867410.37936/ecti-cit.2022164.248674 ↗
9. 10.1109/CVPR.2019.0082810.1109/CVPR.2019.00828 ↗
10. Ge Z. Liu S. Wang F. Li Z. & Sun J. (2021). Yolox: Exceeding yolo series in 2021.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.08430.
11. 10.1109/CVPR.2019.0072010.1109/CVPR.2019.00720 ↗
12. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.16910.1109/ICCV.2015.169 ↗
13. Han, K., Xiao, A., Wu, E., Guo, J., Xu, C., & Wang, Y. (2021). Transformer in transformer. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34, 15908–15919.
14. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11127710.1016/j.measurement.2022.111277 ↗
15. 10.1109/ICCV.2019.0014010.1109/ICCV.2019.00140 ↗
16. Howard A. G. Zhu M. Chen B. Kalenichenko D. Wang W. Weyand T. Andreetto M. & Adam H. (2017). Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.04861.
17. 10.1109/CVPR.2018.0074510.1109/CVPR.2018.00745 ↗
18. Intel. (2023). oneDNN: Deep Learning Performance Acceleration Library Documentation. https://oneapi-src.github.io/oneDNN.
19. 10.1109/CVPR.2018.0028610.1109/CVPR.2018.00286 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.13510.1016/j.procs.2022.01.135 ↗
21. Jocher G. Stoken A. Borovec J. Changyu L. Hogan A. Diaconu L. Ingham F. Poznanski J. Fang J. & Yu L. (2020). “ultralytics/yolov5: v3. 1-bug fixes and performance improvements.” Zenodo.
22. Ke, J., Wang, Q., Wang, Y., Milanfar, P., Yang, F. (2021). Musiq: Multi-scale image quality transformer. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 5148–5157.
23. 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2022.10227310.1016/j.aquaeng.2022.102273 ↗
24. 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.308482710.1109/TNNLS.2021.3084827 ↗
25. 10.1109/IJCNN54540.2023.1019149710.1109/IJCNN54540.2023.10191497 ↗
26. 10.3390/app1108372510.3390/app11083725 ↗
27. Lin T.-Y. Maire M. Belongie S. Hays J. Perona P. Ramanan D. Dollár P. & Zitnick C. L. (2014). Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. Paper presented at the Computer Vision–ECCV 2014: 13th European Conference Zurich Switzerland September 6-12 2014 Proceedings Part V 13.10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 ↗
28. Liu W. Anguelov D. Erhan D. Szegedy C. Reed S. Fu C.-Y. & Berg A. C. (2016). Ssd: Single shot multibox detector. Paper presented at the Computer Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference Amsterdam The Netherlands October 11–14 2016 Proceedings Part I 14.
29. 10.1109/BigData50022.2020.937799110.1109/BigData50022.2020.9377991 ↗
30. 10.3390/f1303038310.3390/f13030383 ↗
31. 10.3390/electronics1212258310.3390/electronics12122583 ↗
32. Ma, Y., Yu, D., Wu, T., & Wang, H. (2019). PaddlePaddle: An open-source deep learning platform from industrial practice. Frontiers of Data and Domputing, 1(1), 105–115.
33. 10.1016/j.compag.2022.10751710.1016/j.compag.2022.107517 ↗
34. Redmon J. & Farhadi A. (2018). Yolov3: An incremental improvement.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767.
35. 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.257703110.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031 ↗
36. Rezatofighi, H., Tsoi, N., Gwak, J. Y., Sadeghian, A., Reid, I., Savarese, S. (2019). Generalized intersection over union: A metric and a loss for bounding box regression. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 658–666.
37. Rodriguez, A., Segal, E., Meiri, E., Fomenko, E., Jim Kim, Y., Shen, H., & Ziv, B. (2018). Lower numerical precision deep learning inference and training. Intel White Paper, 3(1), 1–19.
38. Rukundo O. & Cao H. (2012). Nearest neighbor value interpolation.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.1768.
39. 10.28932/jutisi.v6i2.268810.28932/jutisi.v6i2.2688 ↗
40. 10.1109/IAEAC54830.2022.993010110.1109/IAEAC54830.2022.9930101 ↗
41. Targ S. Almeida D. & Lyman K. (2016). Resnet in resnet: Generalizing residual architectures.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.08029.
42. 10.1109/ICCV.2019.0031010.1109/ICCV.2019.00310 ↗
43. 10.1109/CVPRW50498.2020.0020310.1109/CVPRW50498.2020.00203 ↗
44. Wang Y. Zhou Q. Xiong J. Wu X. & Jin X. (2019b). ESNet: An efficient symmetric network for real-time semantic segmentation. Paper presented at the Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision: Second Chinese Conference PRCV 2019 Xi’an People’s Republic of China November 8–11 2019 Proceedings Part II 2.
45. 10.1109/ICCV.2017.19310.1109/ICCV.2017.193 ↗
46. Yu G. Chang Q. Lv W. Xu C. Cui C. Ji W. Dang Q. Deng K. Wang G. & Du Y. (2021). PP-PicoDet: A better real-time object detector on mobile devices.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.00902.
47. 10.1609/aaai.v34i07.699910.1609/aaai.v34i07.6999 ↗
48. 10.1109/TCYB.2021.309530510.1109/TCYB.2021.3095305 ↗
49. 10.3390/su1410630610.3390/su14106306 ↗
50. 10.1080/17499518.2023.217218710.1080/17499518.2023.2172187 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.undsp.2022.07.00310.1016/j.undsp.2022.07.003 ↗