Estimating local pavement performance and remaining service interval using neural networks-based models and automation tool
Source abstract
Abstract
This study introduces an integrated approach to enhance county pavement management, emphasising operational efficiency in determining the Remaining Service Interval (RSI) for rigid and flexible pavements. It establishes a robust methodology for systematically processing raw county road data through dynamic segmentation and summarisation to create a structured pavement database. It also incorporates innovative approaches and input configurations in employing Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) to predict current and future county pavement performance indicators, including International Roughness Index (IRI), rutting, transverse, and longitudinal cracks, even with limited data. Evaluation of the ANN models on independent county road databases exhibited high prediction accuracies (0.86 < R2 < 0.99), varying with specific performance indicators. The study results in an automation tool for expediting road performance estimation over multiple years. This tool seamlessly integrates the ANN models, empowering county engineers to make data-driven decisions and optimise resource allocation for effective pavement management, achieving significant cost savings.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Traffic Prediction and Management Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA
Department of Civil Engineering, Adana Alparslan Türkeş Science and Technology University, Adana, Turkey
Iowa County Engineers Association (ICEA) Service Bureau, West Des Moines, IA, USA
Funding
Iowa Department of Transportation · Iowa Highway Research Board
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/14680629.2022.204805510.1080/14680629.2022.2048055 ↗
2. 10.1061/JPEODX.000002310.1061/JPEODX.0000023 ↗
3. 10.1080/10298436.2018.144141410.1080/10298436.2018.1441414 ↗
4. 10.1080/14680629.2023.219988210.1080/14680629.2023.2199882 ↗
5. 10.1080/10298436.2016.117616710.1080/10298436.2016.1176167 ↗
6. 10.1080/14680629.2016.120212910.1080/14680629.2016.1202129 ↗
7. 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00615.x10.1111/j.1467-8667.2009.00615.x ↗
8. 10.3390/app1312706410.3390/app13127064 ↗
9. Citir, N., Ceylan, H., Kim, S., & Kaya, O. (2021). Incorporating the effectiveness of preservation and rehabilitation techniques on flexible pavement service life predictions using machine learning approach. In Airfield and Highway Pavements, 365–377.
10. Citir, N., Ceylan, H., Kim, S., Kaya, O., & Waid, D. (2023). Predicting Iowa concrete overlay performance and remaining service life using statistics and deep learning techniques. In 13th International Conference on Low-Volume Roads (p. 179).
11. 10.1080/14680629.2023.219987910.1080/14680629.2023.2199879 ↗
12. Citir, N., Kaya, O., Ceylan, H., Kim, S., Waid, D., & Moore, B. P. (2021). Development of Iowa Pavement Analysis Techniques (IPAT) (No. IHRB Project TR-740). Iowa.
13. Elkins, G. E., Rada, G. R., Groeger, J., & Visintine, B. A. (2013). Pavement remaining service interval implementation guidelines (No. FHWA-HRT-13-050). United States Federal Highway Administration Office of Infrastructure Research and Development.
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.14210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.142 ↗
15. 10.1080/10298436.2020.186785410.1080/10298436.2020.1867854 ↗
16. 10.1061/JPEODX.000008810.1061/JPEODX.0000088 ↗
17. H.R. 4348 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). (2012). An act to authorize funds for federal-aid highways highway safety programs and transit programs and for other purposes. 112 Congress 2nd Session.
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000077910.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000779 ↗
19. 10.1177/036119812091588910.1177/0361198120915889 ↗
20. 10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-116010.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1160 ↗
21. 10.1080/14680629.2023.222283510.1080/14680629.2023.2222835 ↗
22. 10.1080/14680629.2022.211706210.1080/14680629.2022.2117062 ↗
23. Lin, J. D., Yau, J. T., & Hsiao, L. H. (2003). Correlation analysis between international roughness index (IRI) and pavement distress by neural network. 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board (pp. 12–16).
24. 10.1080/10298436.2019.160967310.1080/10298436.2019.1609673 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jtte.2016.09.00710.1016/j.jtte.2016.09.007 ↗
26. 10.3390/math712119810.3390/math7121198 ↗
27. Nlenanya I. (2017 May 17). Iowa pavement management program: Overview. Asset Management Peer Exchange St. Cloud MN. http://www.mnltap.umn.edu/research/edc/peerexchange/documents/Nlenanya.pdf.
28. Perera, R. W., & Kohn, S. D. (2001). LTPP data analysis: Factors affecting pavement smoothness. NCHRP Project 20-50 (8/13). Transportation Research Board.
29. Porras-Alvarado, J. D., Zhang, Z., & Salazar, L. G. L. (2014). Probabilistic approach to modeling pavement performance using IRI data. Transportation Research Board.
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2008)14:2(129)10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2008)14:2(129) ↗
31. 10.1080/10298436.2012.70332210.1080/10298436.2012.703322 ↗
32. Suliman, A. M., Awed, A. M., Abd El-Hakim, R. T., & El-Badawy, S. M. (2023). International roughness index prediction for jointed plain concrete pavements using regression and machine learning techniques. Transportation Research Record. 03611981231173639.
33. 10.1080/14680629.2023.221933810.1080/14680629.2023.2219338 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.11.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.11.001 ↗
35. Visintine, B. A., Rada, G. R., Simpson, A. L., & Wheeler, A. F. (2018). Guidelines for informing decision making to affect pavement performance measures (No. FHWA-HRT-17-090). United States Federal Highway Administration Office of Infrastructure Research and Development.
36. 10.1080/14680629.2023.229446410.1080/14680629.2023.2294464 ↗
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.000054210.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000542 ↗
38. 10.3141/1853-0110.3141/1853-01 ↗
39. 10.1177/036119811882250110.1177/0361198118822501 ↗
40. 10.1080/10298436.2015.101949810.1080/10298436.2015.1019498 ↗