Optimisation of gradation based on fractal dimension for large-size graded crushed stone
Source abstract
Abstract
To improve the mechanical properties of large particle size graded crushed stone mixture and obtain the optimal grading. By using different design methods to obtain the grading of large particle size graded crushed stone, the maximum dry density test, CBR penetration test, static pressure test, and cyclic repeated compaction test were conducted on the large particle size graded crushed stone samples. Finally, fractal theory was introduced to quantitatively calculate the grading of large particle size graded crushed stone, and the fractal dimension of large particle size graded crushed stone was obtained. The relationship between the fractal dimension of large particle size graded crushed stone and density, CBR value, compressive strength, and deformation resistance was analyzed through grey correlation analysis. The experimental results show that large particle size graded crushed stone has better skeleton performance than conventional graded crushed stone; The density, CBR value, compressive strength, and deformation resistance of large-sized graded crushed stone are related to the grading. The skeleton dense grading ratio has stronger mechanical properties compared to the suspended dense grading and skeleton interlocking grading. And the optimal fractal dimension for the optimal configuration should be between 2.59−2.61.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Guangxi Transportation Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd
Key Laboratory of Road Structures and Materials in Guangxi; Guangxi Key Lab of Road Structure and Materials
Guilin University of Technology
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.05.00210.1016/j.trgeo.2017.05.002 ↗
2. 10.34118/jbms.v5i1.5310.34118/jbms.v5i1.53 ↗
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000060110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000601 ↗
4. 10.1061/JHTRCQ.000051210.1061/JHTRCQ.0000512 ↗
5. 10.1080/10298436.2012.69051810.1080/10298436.2012.690518 ↗
6. 10.1007/978-1-4615-3118-0_610.1007/978-1-4615-3118-0_6 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.11010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.110 ↗
8. JTG 3430–2020. Code for geotechnical testing of highways [S]
9. JTG E42–2005. Code for Testing Aggregates in Highway Engineering [S]
10. 10.1080/14680629.2022.204437310.1080/14680629.2022.2044373 ↗
11. 10.3390/ma1212189110.3390/ma12121891 ↗
12. 10.3390/app12201030310.3390/app122010303 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.14110.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.141 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12020910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120209 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13262810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132628 ↗
16. 10.1088/1755-1315/632/5/05200610.1088/1755-1315/632/5/052006 ↗
17. 10.11896/cldb.1803001410.11896/cldb.18030014 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.156.3775.63610.1126/science.156.3775.636 ↗
19. Omer, O. G., Mohamed, A. E., & Elsharief, A. M. (2014). Effects of gradation, moisture and density on strength, stiffness and deformation resistance of pure crushed stone base blend. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 1(1), 455–469.
20. Peng, B. (2005). Gradation design method based on method of I change. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, 29, 751–754.
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.10110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.101 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.17210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.172 ↗
23. Suo Z. Wei C. Lei N. & Kailin Q. (2022). Research on the application of ultra large particle size graded crushed stone in asphalt pavement base layer; Highways.
24. 10.3390/ma1407158410.3390/ma14071584 ↗
25. 10.1080/10298436.2021.202140410.1080/10298436.2021.2021404 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10761510.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.107615 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.22510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.225 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.25410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.254 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13491310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.134913 ↗
30. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.838-841.96210.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.838-841.962 ↗
31. 10.3390/ma1218303510.3390/ma12183035 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.10555110.1016/j.istruc.2023.105551 ↗