Performance evaluation of marginal materials in geosynthetic reinforced base layers
Source abstract
Abstract
The high-altitude regions are prone to natural disasters such as landslides, and tunnelling that generate substantial amounts of debris. Utilising these waste (marginal) materials in the pavement sector offers a viable solution. This study aims to stabilise tunnel muck, landslide debris, and Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement using geosynthetics (geogrid, geocell, double geogrid, and geogrid + geocell) for the base course. Cyclic Plate Load tests were performed on pavement prototypes built with available marginal materials and conventional GSB as the base/subbase course, with Black cotton and silty soil subgrades. The results indicated that geosynthetic reinforcement significantly improved the performance of marginal materials by lowering permanent deformation and increasing design life. The pavement prototypes reinforced with double geogrid and geogrid + geocell indicated rutting performance equivalent to conventional GSB for specific combinations. Additionally, incorporating geosynthetics in pavement layers increased the structural strength of the base layers by a layer coefficient ratio factor ranging from 1.1 to 2.5.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies · Geotechnical and construction materials studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
IIT Kharagpur
Flexible pavement, CSIR- CRRI
CSIR-CRRI
Rowan University
Funding
G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment and Sustainable Development
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. (1993). Guide for design of pavement structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AASHTO.
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000034910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000349 ↗
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000397210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003972 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.10055710.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100557 ↗
5. 10.1007/s40891-022-00373-310.1007/s40891-022-00373-3 ↗
6. Berg, R. R. (2000). Geosynthetic reinforcement of the aggregate base/subbase courses of pavement structures. Geosynthetic Materials Association. 176p.
7. 10.1520/GTJ10227710.1520/GTJ102277 ↗
8. 10.1680/jgein.17.0003110.1680/jgein.17.00031 ↗
9. 10.1080/10298436.2019.158743710.1080/10298436.2019.1587437 ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(775)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(775) ↗
11. 10.1007/s40891-023-00497-010.1007/s40891-023-00497-0 ↗
12. 10.1080/14680629.2020.181242410.1080/14680629.2020.1812424 ↗
13. Gupta R. (2009). A study of geosynthetic reinforced flexible pavement system.
14. Henry K. S. Clapp J. Davids W. Humphrey D. & Barna L. (2009). Structural improvements of flexible pavements using geosynthetics for base course reinforcement (Report No. ERDC/CRREL TR-09-11). Federal Highway Administration.
15. Holtz R. D. Christopher B. R. & Berg R. R. (2008). Geosynthetic design and construction guidelines reference manual (NHI course No. 132013). FHWA Publication No. FHWA-HI-95-038. Federal Highway Administration.
16. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.12.01210.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.12.012 ↗
17. IRC S. P. 59. (2019). Guidelines for use of geosynthetics in road pavements and associated works. Indian Road Congress.
18. 10.1177/036119810519360010610.1177/0361198105193600106 ↗
19. 10.1520/JTE2016017010.1520/JTE20160170 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.16610.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.166 ↗
21. 10.1080/14680629.2021.192423310.1080/14680629.2021.1924233 ↗
22. 10.1080/19386362.2017.130730910.1080/19386362.2017.1307309 ↗
23. 10.1061/41165(397)47310.1061/41165(397)473 ↗
24. 10.1520/JTE2022062710.1520/JTE20220627 ↗
25. 10.1179/1939787914Y.000000004210.1179/1939787914Y.0000000042 ↗
26. Saladhi M. (2017). Experimental study on resilient behavior of geocell-reinforced recycled asphalt pavement base layer: Model development [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Texas at Arlington https://mavmatrix.uta.edu.
27. 10.1007/s40098-020-00484-610.1007/s40098-020-00484-6 ↗
28. 10.1007/s40098-014-0120-810.1007/s40098-014-0120-8 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000176010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001760 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.06.00410.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.06.004 ↗
31. 10.1177/036119810519360010810.1177/0361198105193600108 ↗
32. Tiwari, R. P. (2002). Status of seismicity in the northeast India and earthquake disaster mitigation. ENVIS Bull, 10(1), 15–25.