journal article·2024-07-02Open access

Pavement rutting performance analysis of automated vehicles: contribution of flexible pavement layers’ characteristics

Ali Yeganeh, Bram Vandoren, Ali Pirdavani

Abstract

Designing and implementing appropriate pavement structures in the era of coexisting automated vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HDVs) is a significant concern for researchers and road practitioners. This necessitates investigating the pavement performance subjected to the various loading distribution scenarios induced by different lateral movement patterns of AVs. It is known that the pavement layers' thickness and material influence pavement performance. This study used a finite element method (FEM) to model AVs' loading distributions and simulate the rutting performance of a full-depth flexible pavement structure constructed in different layers' thicknesses and materials. The results revealed that the layers' thickness and material contribution depend on the lane distribution scenario and the AVs' wander mode. In some AV scenarios, improving the layers' material and increasing the thickness could help reduce the pavement rutting damage compared to HDV scenarios, with the extent of this effect influenced by AVs' wander mode.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Transport Systems and Technology · Traffic control and management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

UHasselt, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Agoralaan, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium

UHasselt, The Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), Martelarenlaan 42, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium

Funding

Special Research Fund · Hasselt University

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3166/rmpd.9.463-47910.3166/rmpd.9.463-479 ↗
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:11(1265)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:11(1265) ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.05710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.057 ↗
4. Buiter, R., et al. (1989). Effects of transverse distribution of heavy vehicles on thickness design of full-depth asphalt pavements. Transportation Research Record, 1227(1), 66–74.
5. 10.1016/j.trc.2019.04.00110.1016/j.trc.2019.04.001 ↗
6. 10.3141/2550-1010.3141/2550-10 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12066910.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120669 ↗
8. Chen, L., et al. (2020). Dynamic impact analysis of automated Bus on asphalt pavement. In 3rd international
9. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.08.04510.1016/j.advengsoft.2006.08.045 ↗
10. Forum on connected automated vehicle highway system through the China highway & transportation society. SAE International.
11. 10.1080/10298436.2022.204627410.1080/10298436.2022.2046274 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jtte.2021.04.00210.1016/j.jtte.2021.04.002 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.trc.2020.02.00210.1016/j.trc.2020.02.002 ↗
14. 10.1080/10298436.2020.173563610.1080/10298436.2020.1735636 ↗
15. Hua J. (1998). Finite element modeling and analysis of accelerated pavement testing device and rutting phenomenon.
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2002)210.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2002)2 ↗
17. Huang, H. (1995). Analysis of accelerated pavement tests and finite element modeling of rutting phenomenon. Purdue University by Haiming Huang.
18. 10.1080/14680629.2023.219281410.1080/14680629.2023.2192814 ↗
19. McCullah J. & Gray D. (2005). Cooperative Highway Program.
20. 10.1007/978-981-15-0802-8_9810.1007/978-981-15-0802-8_98 ↗
21. 10.3141/2640-0310.3141/2640-03 ↗
22. Olsson, J., Zeng, L., & Wiberg, N. E. (2000). Finite element analysis of road rutting. European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, ECCOMAS 2000(September), 11–14.
23. 10.1080/14680629.2021.196381510.1080/14680629.2021.1963815 ↗
24. 10.1080/14680629.2021.188346910.1080/14680629.2021.1883469 ↗
25. 10.1080/14680629.2016.116273010.1080/14680629.2016.1162730 ↗
26. Smith M. (2009). ‘ABAQUS/Standard User’s Manual Version 6.9.’ Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp Providence RI.
27. 10.1016/j.trd.2020.10266710.1016/j.trd.2020.102667 ↗
28. 10.2507/IJSIMM16(2)4.37410.2507/IJSIMM16(2)4.374 ↗
29. 10.1080/14680629.2008.969014410.1080/14680629.2008.9690144 ↗
30. 10.1080/10298436.2021.193593810.1080/10298436.2021.1935938 ↗
31. 10.1061/9780784483503.02810.1061/9780784483503.028 ↗
32. 10.1080/10298436.2022.204926410.1080/10298436.2022.2049264 ↗
33. 10.1177/036119811985356010.1177/0361198119853560 ↗