Optimal time-frequency equivalency factor for approximate interconversion between the dynamic and relaxation moduli
Source abstract
Abstract
The viscoelastic stiffness of asphalt concrete is commonly represented using relaxation modulus and dynamic modulus, which are functions of loading time and loading frequency, respectively. They are typically measured via experimental testing whereby only one of the moduli is determined, and interconversion techniques can be used to obtain the other modulus if needed. Although exact approaches exist for pavement modulus interconversion, they can be difficult to implement in practice, and approximate conversion techniques have therefore been developed for conventional use. A popular approach is to approximate a direct relationship between the time and frequency domains via an equivalency factor, but there is no apparent consensus on its proper value. In this paper, a new numerical technique is applied to experimental data to ascertain the optimal value of the time-frequency equivalency factor. Approximate conversions from dynamic modulus to relaxation modulus are conducted using the optimal factor, and results are compared to popular alternative approaches. The optimal factor is determined to be 0.0673±0.0009 with 95% confidence. Using the mean value of 0.0673 produced conversion errors of 1.41% on average among 30 samples of hot mix asphalt.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Image and Signal Denoising Methods · Numerical methods in inverse problems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
Applied Research Associates, Inc., Champaign, IL, USA
Funding
Georgia Department of Transportation
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3141/2087-0910.3141/2087-09 ↗
2. Al-Qadi, I. L., Xie, W., & Elseifi, M. A. (2008). Frequency determination from vehicular loading time pulse to predict appropriate complex modulus in MEPDG. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 77, 739–772.
3. 10.1061/JPEODX.000028110.1061/JPEODX.0000281 ↗
4. 10.1016/B978-0-12-174252-2.50009-010.1016/B978-0-12-174252-2.50009-0 ↗
5. 10.3141/1630-0110.3141/1630-01 ↗
6. Dongré R. Myers L. & D'Angelo J. (2006). Conversion of testing frequency to loading time: Impact on performance predictions obtained from the M–E Pavement Design Guide. In Transportation research board 85th annual meeting (pp. 574–579).
7. 10.1007/s11043-010-9128-310.1007/s11043-010-9128-3 ↗
8. Ferry, J. D. (1980). Viscoelastic properties of polymers. Wiley.
9. Kim S. Etheridge R. A. Chorzepa M. G. & Kim Y. R. (2019). Effects of asphalt mixture characteristics of dynamic modulus and fatigue performance. Research Project No. 16–19 GDOT.
10. Kim, S. S., Lee, H. S., Durham, S. A., Davis, R. B., & Romeo, R. (2022). Updated layer coefficients for GDOT flexible pavement design. Georgia Department of Transportation, FHWA-GA-22-1805.
11. Kim, Y. R. (2009). Modeling of asphalt concrete. The American Society of Civil Engineers.
12. 10.1061/JPEODX.000004410.1061/JPEODX.0000044 ↗
13. MATLAB (2022). Statistics and machine learning toolbox. The MathWorks.
14. 10.1080/14680629.2007.969007810.1080/14680629.2007.9690078 ↗
15. 10.1016/0095-8522(59)90067-410.1016/0095-8522(59)90067-4 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00055-910.1016/S0020-7683(98)00055-9 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00055-910.1016/S0020-7683(98)00055-9 ↗
18. 10.1016/0001-8716(68)80001-X10.1016/0001-8716(68)80001-X ↗
19. 10.1177/0361198121102885910.1177/03611981211028859 ↗
20. Tarefder R. A. & Asifur Rahman A. S. M. (2016). Interconversion of dynamic modulus to creep compliance and relaxation modulus: Numerical modeling and laboratory validation. Nevada Department of Transportation 456–438.
21. 10.1080/14680629.2011.971389910.1080/14680629.2011.9713899 ↗
22. 10.1007/978-3-642-73602-510.1007/978-3-642-73602-5 ↗
23. 10.1177/036119819615400010310.1177/0361198196154000103 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000068810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000688 ↗