journal article·2022-06-03

Evaluation of hydroplaning potential using Mobile Lidar measurements for network-level pavement management applications

Charles F. Gurganusa, Shi Chang, Nasir G. Gharaibeh

Publisher page

Abstract

The majority of weather-related crashes in the U.S. occur on wet pavement, potentially due to hydroplaning. However, hydroplaning potential is often not considered in network-level pavement condition assessments. This paper provides a method for evaluating hydroplaning potential based on the actual road surface and geometric properties measured using mobile Light Detection and Ranging (lidar). The lidar measurements were placed in a grid format, and water film thickness was determined based on water depth and pavement macrotexture. A Monte Carlo simulation produced a travelling speed at which hydroplaning could occur. The developed method was applied to an in-service roadway section with historical wet weather crashes. It successfully identified the critical drainage basin and determined that the travelling speed at which hydroplaning could occur is lower than the posted speed limit. This method can be integrated into network-level pavement management systems to identify roadway sections with high risk of wet weather crashes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Urban Stormwater Management Solutions · Smart Materials for Construction

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Texas A&M Transportation Institute, College Station, TX, USA

Zachry Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) · 2007
2. Anderson D. A. · 1998
3. Asquith W. H. · 2004
4. 10.3141/2440-0110.3141/2440-01 ↗
5. 10.3141/2521-0310.3141/2521-03 ↗
6. Gallaway, B. M., Ivey, D. L., Hayes, G., Ledbetter, W. B., Olson, R. M., Woods, D. L. & Schiller Jr, R. F. (1979). Pavement and geometric design criteria for minimizing hydroplaning (No. FHWA-RD-79-31 Final Rpt.).
7. Gallaway B. M. · 1970
8. Gallaway, B. M., Schiller, R. E. & Rose, J. G. (1971). The effects of rainfall intensity, pavement cross slope, surface texture, and drainage length on pavement water depths (No. Study No 138).
9. Gunaratne M. · 2012
10. Gurganus, C. F. (2018). Improving roadway diagnostics using network-level data [Doctoral dissertation]. Texas A&M University.
11. Gurganus C. F. · Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements · 2020 · 146
12. 10.3141/2655-1110.3141/2655-11 ↗
13. 10.3141/1599-1610.3141/1599-16 ↗
14. 10.4271/06-12-01-000510.4271/06-12-01-0005 ↗
15. Lantieri C. · International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology · 2015 · 8 · 1-9
16. 10.3311/PPtr.820810.3311/PPtr.8208 ↗
17. 10.3141/2457-1310.3141/2457-13 ↗
18. 10.3141/2068-0410.3141/2068-04 ↗
19. Olsen M. J. · 2013
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:10(590)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:10(590) ↗
21. 10.1177/036119810519050011810.1177/0361198105190500118 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.12.00210.1016/j.envsoft.2009.12.002 ↗
23. 10.5194/esurf-2-1-201410.5194/esurf-2-1-2014 ↗
24. Sundararajan, S., and Zohdy, I. (2016). Vehicle automation and weather: Challenges and opportunities. FHWA Final Report, FHWA-JPO-17-494.
25. Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). (2014). TxDOT hydraulic design manual.
26. Tirerack. (2017a). Tire tech tire specs explained: Tread Depth.
27. Tirerack. (2017b). Tire Tech air pressure, time fluctuations.
28. 10.3141/2367-0610.3141/2367-06 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000035310.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000353 ↗
30. 10.3141/2369-1210.3141/2369-12 ↗