Effect of warm mix additives and hydrated lime on viscosity and bonding–debonding behaviour of RET and PPA modified asphalt binder with aggregates
Source abstract
Abstract
Higher energy requirement for asphaltic layer construction with asphalt binder containing reactive elastomeric terpolymer (RET) and poly phosphoric acid (PPA) can be addressed to a greater extent with the addition of warm mix asphalt (WMA) additives. However, moisture damage related problem is one of the concerns with such addition, which further aggravates with an increase in ageing level. The addition of lime may help in addressing moisture damage related problems in such cases. Previous research works show that based on the interaction between asphalt binder and particular WMA additive, the viscosity may undesirably increase also. So far, the influence of different WMA additives (wax, chemical surfactant (CS) and water-based (WB)) on the workability related properties of asphalt binder containing RET and PPA is not understood. It is also not clear if such warm mix additives with/without lime can help in improving long-term bonding with different aggregate types or not. Therefore, this research work aimed at identifying the appropriate WMA additive (with/without lime) which can help in (a) addressing the workability related problem and (b) improving long-term bonding with different aggregate types. To achieve this, different types of WMA additives (with/without lime) were added to RET and PPA modified binder. Viscosity-based measurement and chemical analysis using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy were performed to understand workability and underlying chemical changes. Results indicated that although wax and CS-based warm mix additives can help in reducing energy demand, the addition of WB warm mix additive will have a negative impact from the workability perspective. Likewise, dynamic contact angle for different binder combinations was measured to evaluate the surface free energy components, which further helped to examine the long-term bonding with different aggregate types. Among different WMA additive types, the use of wax-based WMA additive was found to be most effective in improving compatibility with different aggregate types. Also, irrespective of the binder combination, the addition of lime improved the long-term bonding with considered aggregate types.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Transport Systems and Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India
Department of Civil Engineering, School of Technology, Pandit Deendayal Energy University, Gandhinagar, India
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Dharwad, Dharwad, India
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.12.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.12.014 ↗
2. 10.3141/2505-0810.3141/2505-08 ↗
3. Arega Z. · 2012
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000031510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000315 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.05710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.057 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.01.07210.1016/j.fuel.2012.01.072 ↗
7. Baumgardner G. L. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2005 · 74 · 283
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:8(634)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:8(634) ↗
9. Buddhala A. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2012 · 40 · 9110.1520/JTE103618 ↗
10. Cao W. D. · 2011 · 288
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.04310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.043 ↗
12. CPAP (Cooperation of the Polyphosphoric Acid Producers) · 2012
13. 10.1520/ACEM2019021110.1520/ACEM20190211 ↗
14. 10.1080/14680629.2015.103083510.1080/14680629.2015.1030835 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000122210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001222 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.31810.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.318 ↗
17. 10.1617/s11527-013-0242-y10.1617/s11527-013-0242-y ↗
18. 10.1080/14680629.2014.99520910.1080/14680629.2014.995209 ↗
19. 10.1080/14680629.2005.969001510.1080/14680629.2005.9690015 ↗
20. Engber, S. L. & Reinke, G. H. (2000).U.S. patent no. 6,117,926. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
21. Engber, S. L. & Reinke, G. H. (2002).U.S. patent no. 6,399,680. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
22. Goh, S. W. (2012).Development and improvement of warm-mix asphalt technology[Ph.D. thesis]. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan Technological University.
23. Griffith, J. & Puzinauskas, V. (1963, January). Relation of empirical tests to fundamental viscosity of asphalt cement. InSymposium on fundamental viscosity of bituminous materials. ASTM International.10.1520/STP43700S ↗
24. 10.1061/9780784480052.03010.1061/9780784480052.030 ↗
25. 10.1177/036119811878437710.1177/0361198118784377 ↗
26. 10.1080/14680629.2021.192557610.1080/14680629.2021.1925576 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.06010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.060 ↗
28. Hill B. · Urbana · 2011 · 51 · 10
29. 10.1617/s11527-017-1059-x10.1617/s11527-017-1059-x ↗
30. 10.1617/s11527-018-1170-710.1617/s11527-018-1170-7 ↗
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000056210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000562 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.03210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.032 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.09810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.098 ↗
34. Hurley G. C. · NCAT Report · 2005 · 5 · 1
35. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.09.00210.1016/j.fuproc.2015.09.002 ↗
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000244110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002441 ↗
37. 10.1080/10298436.2017.138080610.1080/10298436.2017.1380806 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.04310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.043 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.08510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.085 ↗
40. Koc M. · 2013 · 167
41. 10.3141/1998-0610.3141/1998-06 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00121-610.1016/S0016-2361(00)00121-6 ↗
43. Little, D. N. & Bhasin, A. (2006).Using surface energy measurements to select materials for asphalt pavement(No. NCHRP Project 9-37).
44. 10.1007/s42947-019-0097-x10.1007/s42947-019-0097-x ↗
45. 10.1080/10298436.2015.100723010.1080/10298436.2015.1007230 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.04310.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.043 ↗
47. 10.1039/C9RA00645A10.1039/C9RA00645A ↗
48. Puzinauskas, V. P. (1967). Evaluation of properties of asphalt cements with emphasis on consistencies at low temperatures (no. RR-67-3 final rpt.). InProceedings of the Journal: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists(Vol. 36, pp. 489–454).
49. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(246)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(246) ↗
50. Roberts, F. L., Kandhal, P. S., Brown, E. R., Lee, D. Y. & Kennedy, T. W. (1991). Hot mix asphalt materials, mixture design and construction.NAPA research and education foundation.
51. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.05310.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.053 ↗
53. 10.1080/1545962070133501910.1080/15459620701335019 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.07910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.079 ↗
55. 10.3141/2126-1810.3141/2126-18 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.08.00710.1016/j.fuproc.2009.08.007 ↗
57. Trujillo, P. (2011).Long term aging study of WMA binder[Doctoral dissertation]. Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Texas at Austin.
58. 10.1021/cr00088a00610.1021/cr00088a006 ↗
59. 10.1080/14680629.2019.158955910.1080/14680629.2019.1589559 ↗
60. Wasiuddin N. M. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2007 · 35 · 3610.1520/JTE100290 ↗
61. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000022310.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000223 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.06910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.069 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.004 ↗
64. 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:1(9)10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2005)11:1(9) ↗