Characterisation and modelling of subgrade resilient modulus for pavement structural design in Egypt
Source abstract
Abstract
In Egypt, estimation of subgrade resilient modulus (MR) for the structural pavement design is based on empirical correlation with California Bearing Ratio (CBR) adopted from literature. Thus, this study aims at verifying if this correlation is still valid for different Egyptian subgrade soils, otherwise calibration is warranted. A comprehensive experimental program is conducted on local sixteen subgrade materials. The testing program includes MR, CBR, and index soil properties such as gradation, Atterberg limits, Proctor compaction characteristics, and shear strength parameters. Four simple regression models correlating MR and CBR values are developed for local subgrade materials based on the anticipated field stresses under two different traffic loading conditions pertinent to Egypt. The proposed correlations yield more accurate MR values for the local materials and traffic loading conditions. Consequently, this is expected to contribute to a realistic pavement structural design, and hence better pavement performance over the service life.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Geotechnical and construction materials studies · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Public Works Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Highway and Airport Engineering Laboratory, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
Funding
Postgraduate Research and Cultural Affairs Sector (PRCAS), Mansoura University
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO (1993), Guide for design of pavement structure, Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
2. AASHTO. (2003). The California bearing ratio. Washington DC: AASHTO T 193-99.
3. AASHTO. (2012). Classification of soils and soil-aggregate mixtures for Highway Construction purposes. Washington DC: AASHTO M 145-91.
4. AASHTO. (2012). Determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials . Washington DC: AASHTO T 307-99.
5. AASHTO. (2012). Moisture-density relations of soils using a 4.54-kg (10-Ib) Rammer and a 457-mm (18-in.) Drop . Washington DC: AASHTO T 180-97.
6. AASHTO. (2012). Sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates. Washington DC: AASHTO T 27-99.
7. AASHTO. (2014). Determining the liquid limit of soils . Washington DC: AASHTO T 89-96.
8. AASHTO. (2015). Determining the plastic limit and plasticity index of soils. Washington DC: AASHTO T 90-00.
9. 10.1080/14680629.2020.180851910.1080/14680629.2020.1808519 ↗
10. 10.1061/41023(337)5110.1061/41023(337)51 ↗
11. ARA Inc. (2004). Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures - Final Report . National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 1-37A Transportation Research Board National Research Council.
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.04710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.047 ↗
13. 10.1155/2019/823890410.1155/2019/8238904 ↗
14. Austroads. (2012). Pavement design – A guide to the structural design of road pavements.
15. 10.3141/1714-0510.3141/1714-05 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:5(774)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:5(774) ↗
17. ECPURR. (2020). Edition 1: “Road materials and their tests (part four)”. Egyptian Code of Practice for Urban and Rural Roads, The Ministry of Housing, Utilities and Urban Communities.
18. 10.1080/10298436.2020.175441610.1080/10298436.2020.1754416 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.21210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.212 ↗
20. 10.12691/ajcea-8-2-410.12691/ajcea-8-2-4 ↗
21. 10.1177/036119819615470011310.1177/0361198196154700113 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.sandf.2020.02.01010.1016/j.sandf.2020.02.010 ↗
23. 10.1007/978-3-030-01911-2_210.1007/978-3-030-01911-2_2 ↗
24. Heukelom, W., & Klomp, A. (1962, August 20–24). Dynamic testing as a means of controlling pavements during and after construction. International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Vol. 203, No. 1).
25. Huang, Y. (2004). Pavement analysis and design (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
26. 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.00110.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001 ↗
27. 10.1155/2014/37283810.1155/2014/372838 ↗
28. Kolisoja, P. (1997). Resilient deformation characteristics of granular materials (pp. 188–201). Finland, Publications: Tampere University of Technology.
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:1(66)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:1(66) ↗
30. 10.3141/1687-0310.3141/1687-03 ↗
31. 10.1139/cjce-2016-043510.1139/cjce-2016-0435 ↗
32. 10.1051/matecconf/20171200600910.1051/matecconf/201712006009 ↗
33. NCHRP. (2004). Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. NCHRP 1-37A Final Report.
34. 10.1080/10298436.2014.93780710.1080/10298436.2014.937807 ↗
35. Nguyen, B., & Mohajerani, A. (2015b). Prediction of California bearing ratio from physical properties of fine-grained soils. International Journal of Civil: Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 9(2), 136–141.
36. Noureldin E. & Abdelrahman M. (2014). Parametric analysis of resilient modulus modeling for RAP in base layer .10.3141/2401-04 ↗
37. Papp, W., Maher, M., Bennert, T., & Gucunski, N. (1998). Behavior of construction and demolition debris in base and subbase applications. Geotechnical Special Publication (79), 122–136. https://www.researchwithrutgers.com/en/publications/behavior-of-construction-and-demolition-debris-in-base-and-subbas
38. Pellinen, T. K. (2001). Investigation of the use of dynamic modulus as an indicator of hot-mix asphalt peformance. Arizona State University.
39. 10.1520/GTJ10109J10.1520/GTJ10109J ↗
40. Rada G. & Witczak M. (1981). Comprehensive evaluation of laboratory resilient moduli results for granular material (No. 810).
41. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.04210.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.042 ↗
42. Seed, H., Chan, C., & Lee, C. (1960, August 20–24). Resilience characteristics of subgrade soils and their relation to fatigue failures in asphalt pavements. International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements. SupplementUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
43. Thompson, M., & Elliott, R. (1985). ILLI-PAVE based response algorithms for design of conventional flexible pavements. Transportation Research Record, 1043, 50–57. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1985/1043/1043-007.pdf
44. 10.1061/TPEJAN.000077210.1061/TPEJAN.0000772 ↗
45. Trollope, D., Lee, I., & Morris, J. (1962, August 20–24). Stresses and deformation in two layer pavement structures under slow repeated loading. Australian Road Research Board (ARRB) Conference, 1st, 1962, Canberra (Vol. 1, No. 2).
46. Wilson, B., Sargand, S., Hazen, G., & Green, R. (1990). Multiaxial testing of subgrade. Transportation Research Record (1278), 91–95.
47. 10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.06.00510.1016/j.ijtst.2022.06.005 ↗
48. 10.1080/14680629.2015.101305310.1080/14680629.2015.1013053 ↗
49. 10.1080/14680629.2019.165175610.1080/14680629.2019.1651756 ↗
50. 10.1080/14680629.2018.148113810.1080/14680629.2018.1481138 ↗