Effect of various interface bonding conditions on critical response characteristics for cracking potential of asphalt pavements
Source abstract
Abstract
Interface bonding conditions are important to ensure the desired performance of multi-layered asphalt pavements. Most previous studies only investigated the sole effect of the interface at a specific location, although the most extreme case is when poor bonding occurred at multiple locations simultaneously. Also, the sensitivity of bonding effects to structural parameters is unclear. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of multiple bonding scenarios and structural parameters on critical responses, the 3-D viscoelastic finite element model. The results indicated that critical locations for cracking potential depend on bonding scenarios. Interface bonding between asphalt and aggregate base layers mainly contributed to bottom-up cracking, while the interface between asphalt layers was more associated with top-down and near-surface cracking. In addition, the use of a thicker asphalt layer was more effective than the use of a strong base layer to mitigate the negative effects of poor bonding conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
Arkansas Department of Transportation, Little Rock, AR, USA
Department of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Korea Military Academy, Seoul, South Korea
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.12.01410.1016/j.compgeo.2014.12.014 ↗
2. 10.1080/10298436.2016.114983710.1080/10298436.2016.1149837 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.03110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.031 ↗
4. Cross S. A. · 2007
5. 10.1177/036119811875863610.1177/0361198118758636 ↗
6. Huang, Y. H. (1993). Pavement analysis and design.
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000000310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000003 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000015110.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000151 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:11(880)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:11(880) ↗
10. 10.1061/9780784412442.30110.1061/9780784412442.301 ↗
11. Maina, J. W., De Beer, M. & Matsui, K. (2007). Effects of layer interface slip on the response and performance of elastic multi-layered flexible airport pavement systems. Maintenance and rehabilitation of pavements and technological control, fifth international conference, Utha, USA. August 8-10, 2007, pp 145–150.
12. 10.3141/2209-0110.3141/2209-01 ↗
13. 10.1080/10298436.2011.59693510.1080/10298436.2011.596935 ↗
14. Park B. · Materials and Structures · 2021 · 54 · 1
15. Roque, R., Hernando, D., Park, B., Zou, J. & Waisome, J. A. M. (2017). Evaluation of asphalt pavement interface conditions for enhanced bond performance, Rpt. No. 118906, University of Florida, https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/32367
16. Tran, N. H., Richard, W. & Julian, G. (2012). Refinement of the bond strength procedure and investigation of a specification, NCAT Report No. 12-04, Auburn University, National Center for Asphalt Technology.
17. Wang X. · Advances in Civil Engineering · 2020 · 2020 · Article ID 8841
18. West, R. C., Zhang, J. & Moore, J. (2005). Evaluation of bond strength between pavement layers, NCAT Report 05-08, Auburn University, National Center for Asphalt Technology, https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/27815
19. 10.3141/2040-1210.3141/2040-12 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.02.00310.1016/j.ijprt.2017.02.003 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jtte.2020.10.00510.1016/j.jtte.2020.10.005 ↗
22. 10.1080/13923730.2007.963642110.1080/13923730.2007.9636421 ↗