Permeability model and characteristics analysis of porous asphalt mixture under the circulation clogging and cleaning
Source abstract
Abstract
Porous asphalt concrete (PAC) has been widely used. However, clogging is the major limiting factor in PAC’s use. In this work, the permeability model and characteristics of PAC under the condition of cyclic clogging and cleaning were studied. Firstly, three clogging materials were selected for cyclic clogging-cleaning tests to conduct research on PAC’s permeability with different cleaning methods. Further, the relation between mixture parameters and the permeability was analysed, and the permeability coefficient model was established. Last, the clogging factor β was introduced and the relation among clogging factors and the permeability coefficient was expressed by the regression equation. The results revealed there was an obvious exponential relation between the permeability coefficient and clogging times. The V′ CCmixture parameters were correlated highly with the permeability coefficient in the model. Correlation analysis was applied to determine the relations between β and the mixture parameters. Models of βclogging and βcleaning were established with different cleaning methods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Urban Stormwater Management Solutions · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Lanzhou Jiaotong University
Tongji University
Survey & Design Institute CO., LTD
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM D7064. (2008). Standard practice for open graded friction course (OGFC) mix design. American Society for Testing and Materials.
2. Bing T. (2011). Clogging effects of portland cement pervious concrete. A thesis of Master of Science in Iowa State University. https://www.cnki.net/
3. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000128210.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001282 ↗
4. 10.1177/036119811875805110.1177/0361198118758051 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.16210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.162 ↗
6. 10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2016.10.00110.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2016.10.001 ↗
7. 10.3141/2511-0910.3141/2511-09 ↗
8. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000097510.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000975 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.12602810.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126028 ↗
10. 10.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2019.04.00310.19721/j.cnki.1001-7372.2019.04.003 ↗
11. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000128110.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001281 ↗
12. 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2013.02.01610.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2013.02.016 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.02110.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.021 ↗
14. 10.1080/14680629.2017.128335510.1080/14680629.2017.1283355 ↗
15. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000097510.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000975 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000032710.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000327 ↗
17. 10.1080/14680629.2012.74980310.1080/14680629.2012.749803 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.07010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.070 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.04010.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.040 ↗
20. 10.1680/wama.2009.0003410.1680/wama.2009.00034 ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000052910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000529 ↗
22. 10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.000056910.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0000569 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.01810.1016/j.watres.2011.10.018 ↗
24. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.09.00110.3969/j.issn.1001-7372.2018.09.001 ↗
25. 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2009)135:11(832)10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(2009)135:11(832) ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12049110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120491 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jtte.2015.02.00610.1016/j.jtte.2015.02.006 ↗
28. Wang, H. C., Ge, H., & Zhou, M. G. (2016). PAC drainage and anti-clogging ability based on constant head penetration test. Journal of Southeast University, 46((01|1)), 209–214.
29. 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2016.02.03510.3969/j.issn.1007-9629.2016.02.035 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.12.02610.1016/j.jenvman.2015.12.026 ↗
31. 10.1617/s11527-008-9408-410.1617/s11527-008-9408-4 ↗
32. 10.1080/14680629.2017.132987810.1080/14680629.2017.1329878 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12107410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121074 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.31010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.310 ↗
35. 10.19721/j.cnki.1671-8879.2016.01.00410.19721/j.cnki.1671-8879.2016.01.004 ↗
36. 10.1080/10298436.2021.193287710.1080/10298436.2021.1932877 ↗
37. 10.11896/cldb.1910008310.11896/cldb.19100083 ↗
38. Zhu, Y. Q., & Cao, H. L. (2014). Study on the influence of gradation on the anti-blocking performance of OGFC asphalt mixture. Highway Traffic Technology, 10(9), 180–182.