Rutting performance of asphalt-rubber gap-graded mixtures: evaluation through statistical and reliability approaches
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the rutting performance of asphalt-rubber gap-graded (AR-Gap) mixtures using wheel tracking tests and further explain the permanent deformation characteristics of those special materials through statistical and reliability approaches. A total of 28 asphalt mixtures covering over 200,000 data points were utilised, including: 27 AR-Gap mixtures and one conventional dense-graded (DG) mixture. Statistical analysis confirmed the significance of binder type, aggregate gradation, and binder content on the superior rutting resistance of AR-Gap mixtures than the DG mix. Selection of the best combination of all the three variables resulted in a significantly rut-resistant AR-Gap mixture. Reliability analysis on mixtures' rutting performance was accomplished using Weibull distribution function. Weibull model parameters and derived factors aided in a better interpretation of the rutting performance of AR-Gap mixtures. Overall, it is envisaged that this research study would further the state-of-the-art in designing rut-resistant asphalt-rubber gap-graded mixtures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Railway Engineering and Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Tirupati, India
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO T166-10 · 2010
2. Brown, E. R. & Cross, S. A. (1989). A study of in-place rutting of asphalt pavements (Vol. 58, pp. 1––30). Auburn, AL: National Center for Asphalt Technology.
3. BS EN 12697-22 · 2003
4. Button J. W. · Transportation Research Record · 1990 · 1259 · 141
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.02.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.02.004 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.02.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.02.005 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.02110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.021 ↗
8. 10.1080/14680629.2001.968990210.1080/14680629.2001.9689902 ↗
9. Hassan N. A. · Jurnal Teknologi · 2013 · 65 · 115
10. Huber, G. A. & Heiman, G. H. (1987). Effect of asphalt concrete parameters on rutting performance: a field investigation (with discussion). In Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proc (Vol. 56).
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.02010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.020 ↗
12. Manual Series-2 · 2015
13. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways · 2000
14. Monismith C. L. · Transportation Research Record · 1976 · 616 · 2
15. Nievelt, G. & Thamfald, H. (1988). Evaluation of the resistance to deformation of different road structures and asphalt mixtures determined in the pavement-rutting tester (with discussion). In Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proc (Vol. 57).
16. 10.1080/14680629.2004.968997510.1080/14680629.2004.9689975 ↗
17. 10.1080/14680629.2012.65704510.1080/14680629.2012.657045 ↗
18. Stone Matrix Asphalt. Item 346. (2004). Standard specifications for construction and maintenance, streets, and bridges (pp. 364–398). Austin, TX: Texas Department of Transportation.
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.014 ↗
20. Venudharan, V. (2018). Development of asphalt-rubber gap-graded mixture design: Laboratory performance investigations (Ph.D. thesis). Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India.
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.06510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.065 ↗
22. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000188010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001880 ↗
24. 10.1617/s11527-017-0994-x10.1617/s11527-017-0994-x ↗
25. 10.1080/14680629.2016.118206010.1080/14680629.2016.1182060 ↗
26. Way G. B. · 2012
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:6(475)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:6(475) ↗
28. 10.3141/2180-0910.3141/2180-09 ↗