journal article·2020-09-14

Rutting performance of asphalt-rubber gap-graded mixtures: evaluation through statistical and reliability approaches

Veena Venudharan, Krishna Prapoorna Biligiri

Road Materials and Pavement Design· Volume 21· Issue sup1
Publisher page

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the rutting performance of asphalt-rubber gap-graded (AR-Gap) mixtures using wheel tracking tests and further explain the permanent deformation characteristics of those special materials through statistical and reliability approaches. A total of 28 asphalt mixtures covering over 200,000 data points were utilised, including: 27 AR-Gap mixtures and one conventional dense-graded (DG) mixture. Statistical analysis confirmed the significance of binder type, aggregate gradation, and binder content on the superior rutting resistance of AR-Gap mixtures than the DG mix. Selection of the best combination of all the three variables resulted in a significantly rut-resistant AR-Gap mixture. Reliability analysis on mixtures' rutting performance was accomplished using Weibull distribution function. Weibull model parameters and derived factors aided in a better interpretation of the rutting performance of AR-Gap mixtures. Overall, it is envisaged that this research study would further the state-of-the-art in designing rut-resistant asphalt-rubber gap-graded mixtures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Railway Engineering and Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Tirupati, India

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO T166-10 · 2010
2. Brown, E. R. & Cross, S. A. (1989). A study of in-place rutting of asphalt pavements (Vol. 58, pp. 1––30). Auburn, AL: National Center for Asphalt Technology.
3. BS EN 12697-22 · 2003
4. Button J. W. · Transportation Research Record · 1990 · 1259 · 141
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.02.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.02.004 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.02.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.02.005 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.02110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.021 ↗
8. 10.1080/14680629.2001.968990210.1080/14680629.2001.9689902 ↗
9. Hassan N. A. · Jurnal Teknologi · 2013 · 65 · 115
10. Huber, G. A. & Heiman, G. H. (1987). Effect of asphalt concrete parameters on rutting performance: a field investigation (with discussion). In Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proc (Vol. 56).
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.02010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.020 ↗
12. Manual Series-2 · 2015
13. Ministry of Road Transport and Highways · 2000
14. Monismith C. L. · Transportation Research Record · 1976 · 616 · 2
15. Nievelt, G. & Thamfald, H. (1988). Evaluation of the resistance to deformation of different road structures and asphalt mixtures determined in the pavement-rutting tester (with discussion). In Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proc (Vol. 57).
16. 10.1080/14680629.2004.968997510.1080/14680629.2004.9689975 ↗
17. 10.1080/14680629.2012.65704510.1080/14680629.2012.657045 ↗
18. Stone Matrix Asphalt. Item 346. (2004). Standard specifications for construction and maintenance, streets, and bridges (pp. 364–398). Austin, TX: Texas Department of Transportation.
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.014 ↗
20. Venudharan, V. (2018). Development of asphalt-rubber gap-graded mixture design: Laboratory performance investigations (Ph.D. thesis). Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, India.
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.06510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.065 ↗
22. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000188010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001880 ↗
24. 10.1617/s11527-017-0994-x10.1617/s11527-017-0994-x ↗
25. 10.1080/14680629.2016.118206010.1080/14680629.2016.1182060 ↗
26. Way G. B. · 2012
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:6(475)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:6(475) ↗
28. 10.3141/2180-0910.3141/2180-09 ↗