journal article·2024-04-02

Machine learning-based prediction of resilient modulus for blends of tire-derived aggregates and demolition wastes

Behnam Ghorbani, Ehsan Yaghoubi, P. L. P. Wasantha, Rudi van Staden, Maurice Guerrieri, Sam Fragomeni

Publisher page

Abstract

Although numerous studies have been undertaken to examine the potential of C&D wastes in pavement structures, limited research to date has developed constitutive models for the resilient modulus (Mr) of C&D wastes. In this study, machine learning algorithms: artificial neural network (ANN); Support Vector Regression (SVR); and Random Forest Regression (RFR) were utilised for estimating the Mr of C&D wastes blended with tire-derived aggregate (TDA). A database of repeated load triaxial test results on C&D/TDA blends including stress-state parameters, Mr values and other influential parameters on the Mr such as physical properties of the blends, as well as the California bearing ratio (CBR) test results was utilised for developing the machine learning models. The predictive performance of the developed algorithms was assessed using statistical indices and several validation stages. The results exhibited the robustness of machine learning algorithms used for predicting the Mr of C&D/TDA wastes, with R2train, R2test, MAPEtrain, MAPEtest between 0.996–0.997, 0.911–0.997, 0.037–0.068, and 0.037–0.067, respectively. The sensitivity analysis results indicated that the optimum moisture content and CBR had the highest impacts on the Mr of C&D/TDA blends.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

AECOM Australia, Pavements and Aviation, Melbourne, Australia

College of Sport, Health and Engineering, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia

Institute for Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia

Funding

Victorian State Government

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.23210.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.232 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.08.01910.1016/j.compstruc.2011.08.019 ↗
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000212710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002127 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.08410.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.084 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.18910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.189 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000065210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000652 ↗
7. AustRoads. (2000). Determination of permanent deformation and resilient modulus characteristics of unbound granular materials under drained conditions. AustRoads.
8. 10.1139/cgj-2012-040610.1139/cgj-2012-0406 ↗
9. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
10. 10.1080/10298436.2020.174158710.1080/10298436.2020.1741587 ↗
11. 10.2307/193788710.2307/1937887 ↗
12. Freire A. Neves J. Roque A. Milagre Martins I. Antunes M. & Faria G. (2013). Use of construction and demolition recycled materials (C&DRM) in road pavements validated on experimental test sections. Proceedings of WASTES 2013: Solutions Treatments and Opportunities Leeds pp. 91–96.
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000044710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000447 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12249910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122499 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11968810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119688 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.sandf.2020.02.01010.1016/j.sandf.2020.02.010 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.10059210.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100592 ↗
18. Ghorbani, B., Yaghoubi, E., & Arulrajah, A. (2021c). Thermal and mechanical characteristics of recycled concrete aggregates mixed with plastic wastes: experimental investigation and mathematical modeling. Acta Geotechnica, 1–16.
19. 10.1080/14680629.2017.130235710.1080/14680629.2017.1302357 ↗
20. Hick, R., & Monismith, C. (1971). Factors influencing the resilient response of granular materials. Highway Research Record, 345, 15–31.
21. Hoornweg D. & Bhada-Tata P. (2012). What a waste: A global review of solid waste management.
22. Huang Y. H. (1993). Pavement analysis and design.
23. 10.1080/10298436.2021.189599310.1080/10298436.2021.1895993 ↗
24. 10.3390/su1206222910.3390/su12062229 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.23310.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.233 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.10026310.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100263 ↗
27. 10.1007/s12205-014-0316-610.1007/s12205-014-0316-6 ↗
28. Lekarp F. (1999). Resilient and permanent deformation behavior of unbound aggregates under repeated loading. Institutionen för infrastruktur och samhällsplanering.
29. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12612910.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126129 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12573610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125736 ↗
31. 10.1007/BF0247825910.1007/BF02478259 ↗
32. Mohammad, L. N., Titi, H. H., & Herath, A. (2002). Effect of moisture content and dry unit weight on the resilient modulus of subgrade soils predicted by cone penetration test. Louisiana Transportation Research Center.
33. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.08810.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.088 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.dsp.2009.10.01610.1016/j.dsp.2009.10.016 ↗
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000026810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000268 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.10038410.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100384 ↗
37. 10.1080/1029843050014089110.1080/10298430500140891 ↗
38. 10.1080/10298436.2021.190423710.1080/10298436.2021.1904237 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.10472210.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104722 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.06.01410.1016/j.compgeo.2007.06.014 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12042710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120427 ↗
42. Smith G. N. (1986). Probability and statistics in civil engineering. In Collins professional and technical books 244.
43. 10.3390/polym1110167510.3390/polym11101675 ↗
44. 10.1177/036119812090641910.1177/0361198120906419 ↗
45. 10.1080/14680629.2018.154492410.1080/14680629.2018.1544924 ↗
46. 10.1108/JSFE-03-2017-002410.1108/JSFE-03-2017-0024 ↗
47. Vapnik V. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer New York Google Scholar.10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0 ↗
48. Vapnik V. Golowich S. E. & Smola A. J. (1997). Support vector method for function approximation regression estimation and signal processing. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems pp. 281–287.
49. 10.1080/14680629.2020.175690110.1080/14680629.2020.1756901 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.10026510.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100265 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.eng.2020.08.02010.1016/j.eng.2020.08.020 ↗
52. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000182110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001821 ↗
53. 10.1080/14680629.2017.128335410.1080/14680629.2017.1283354 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.10059910.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100599 ↗
55. 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2010)10:1(1)10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2010)10:1(1) ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.18210.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.182 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.09.01610.1016/j.compgeo.2012.09.016 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.02.00910.1016/j.enggeo.2016.02.009 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.10052010.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100520 ↗