journal article·2022-03-04Open access

Application of image analysis tools in Matlab to better estimate the degree of binder coverage in rolling bottles test

Syed Bilal Ahmed Zaidi, James Grenfell, Gordon Airey, Naveed Ahmad, Imtiaz Ahmed, Ayyaz Fareed, Ahmed Abed

Abstract

In asphalt mixture, a strong affinity between binder and aggregates is of prime importance, especially under conditions susceptible to moisture damage. Out of various modifiers/additives used in the literature, the hydrated lime (HL) has been reported as most suitable for improving affinity between binder and aggregates. Therefore, this study attempted to quantify the affinity of HL modified mastics with different aggregates under moist conditions. Further, in order to measure the affinity, the rolling bottle test (RBT) was used, which is also reported as one of the best empirical techniques for assessment of moisture susceptibility. However, in the RBT, the assessment for affinity is generally made through visual inspection by two experienced operators as per a standard procedure which can also be the major drawback of this technique in terms of less reliability and repeatability. Thereby, to reduce this deficiency, the image analysis (with no special setup) was also carried out through the use of the MATLAB program. The results as obtained from image analysis were then compared with the results of visual observation. Both were found to be very similar to each other. Hence, the RBT could be used confidently for the comparison of different binder/aggregate combinations. Also, the RBT results indicated that the HL addition was beneficial with granite, basalt and greywacke aggregates, but it did not have any effect with limestone aggregates. Further, the 10% HL substitution was found to be more efficient than 20% HL substitution as both substitutions showed a similar effect in most of the studied combinations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Transport Systems and Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Taxila Institute of Transportation Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan

ARRB, Australian Road Research Board, Melbourne, Australia

Nottingham Transportation Engineering Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Department of Civil Engineering, Mirpur University of Science and Technology, Mirpur, AJK

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/14680629.2002.968993010.1080/14680629.2002.9689930 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.01210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.012 ↗
3. Asphalt Task Force. (2010). Hydrated lime: A proven additive for durable asphalt pavements, Critical Literature Review, Report To The European Lime Association / Asphalt Task Force.
4. 10.1080/14680629.2004.968996110.1080/14680629.2004.9689961 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.05110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.051 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.007 ↗
7. BS 2000-549. (2007). Bitumen and bituminous binders. Measurement of density and specific gravity. Capillary-stoppered pyknometer method.
8. BS 2000-58. (2007). Bitumen and bituminous binders. Determination of the softening point. Ring and Ball method.
9. BS EN 12697-11. (2012). Bituminous mixtures – test methods for hot mix asphalt – part 11: determination of the affinity between aggregate and bitumen.
10. BS EN 1426. (2000). Methods of tests for petroleum and its products. Bitumen and bituminous binders. Determination of needle penetration.
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.15010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.150 ↗
12. 10.1680/tran.2004.157.3.16310.1680/tran.2004.157.3.163 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12057510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120575 ↗
14. 10.1080/10298436.2012.65574010.1080/10298436.2012.655740 ↗
15. Groenninger J. · Strasse Und Autobahn · 2008 · 59
16. 10.1080/14680629.2010.969031110.1080/14680629.2010.9690311 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11749610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117496 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11781710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117817 ↗
19. Hicks R. G. · 1991
20. Jorgensen T. · 2002
21. Källén H. · 2013
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.01210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.012 ↗
23. Lamperti R. · 2015
24. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.11.00310.1016/j.ijprt.2016.11.003 ↗
25. Liu Y. · International Journal of Pavement Engineering · 2013 · 1
26. 10.3141/2180-1310.3141/2180-13 ↗
27. 10.1007/978-3-319-71023-510.1007/978-3-319-71023-5 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.18810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.188 ↗
29. Santagata, F., Cardone, F., Canestrari, F. & Bahia, H. U. (2009). Modified PATTI test for the characterization of adhesion and cohesion properties of asphalt binders. Proc., sixth international conference on maintenance and rehabilitation of pavements and technological control (MAIREPAV6) international society for maintenance and rehabilitation of transportation infrastructuretransportation research board.
30. 10.3390/ma1219321110.3390/ma12193211 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.06610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.066 ↗
32. Zaidi S. B. A. · 2018
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.03710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.037 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.06.01210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.06.012 ↗