journal article·2019-02-17

The effect of BOFS and GGBFS on the mechanical properties of RCCP

Mohsen Aboutalebi Esfahani, Jalalodin Basij

Publisher page

Abstract

Application of slag instead of aggregates is of importance in different civil construction works and especially in roller-compacted concrete pavement (RCCP) considering its abrasion resistance, shear strength as well as the cost. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of ground-granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) and basic oxygen furnace slag (BOFS) on the mechanical properties of RCCP, using the tests of compressive strength and indirect tensile strength. Mix proportioning was made to introduce BOFS as coarse aggregate and GGBFS as fine aggregate. The results of the study showed that none of the BOFS mix designs could achieve a higher strength than the control sample. Also, the GGBFS mix design proved to have the least compressive strength and tensile strength. It should be mentioned that all samples acquired the minimum strength required for RCCP.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Materials Engineering and Processing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Civil and Transportation, University of Isfahan, Hezar Jarib St., Azady Sq., Isfahan, Iran

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Association, N. S. · 1998
2. ASTM International. · 2005
3. ASTM International · 2008
4. ASTM International · 2010
5. ASTM International · 2011
6. ASTM International · 2012
7. ASTM International · 2013
8. ASTM International · 2015
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.05410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.054 ↗
10. Bohm G. · 2010
11. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.04.00610.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.04.006 ↗
12. British Standards · 1983
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.02710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.027 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.266710.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2667 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.22910.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.229 ↗
16. Harrington D. · 2010
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.05410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.04.054 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.004 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.12110.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.121 ↗
20. 10.1080/14680629.2012.74262910.1080/14680629.2012.742629 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.06310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.063 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.03010.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.030 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.04210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.042 ↗
24. Responsible for Regional Development Steelmaking · 2009
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.00810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.008 ↗
26. Turner Fairbank Highway Research Center · 2002
27. U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior · 2016
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.04410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.044 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.21710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.217 ↗