journal article·2023-05-04

Effect of freeze–thaw and wetting–drying cycles on the CBR, shear strength, stiffness and permanent deformation of crushed waste rocks

Shengpeng Hao, Thomas Pabst

Publisher page

Abstract

Waste rocks produced from mining operations are widely reused for the construction of mine haul roads. However, seasonal changes expose mining facilities to repeated freeze–thaw and wetting–drying cycles which can significantly affect the geotechnical characteristics of the materials in situ. In this study, cyclic and monotonic triaxial and California bearing ratio (CBR) tests were conducted to measure the geotechnical properties of crushed waste rocks subjected to freeze–thaw and wetting–drying cycles. Results showed that freeze–thaw cycles caused a reduction of the resilient modulus and shear strength, and an increase of the permanent deformation. A greater water content during freeze–thaw cycles resulted in a significant increase of the permanent deformation. Wetting–drying cycles could contribute to increase the stiffness, CBR and permanent deformation of crushed waste rocks. Predictive models were also developed to estimate the effect of freeze–thaw cycles on resilient modulus and permanent deformation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Landslides and related hazards · Climate change and permafrost

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, Chongqing University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China

School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China

Department of Civil, Geological, and Mining Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Research Institute on Mines and Environment (RIME), Montréal, Canada

Funding

Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO T307-99 · 2017
2. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.03.00210.1016/j.enggeo.2014.03.002 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.12.00810.1016/j.coldregions.2015.12.008 ↗
4. 10.1617/s11527-011-9790-110.1617/s11527-011-9790-1 ↗
5. ASTM D1557-12e1 · 2012
6. ASTM D1883-16 · 2016
7. ASTM D2487-17e1 · 2017
8. ASTM D559/D559M-15 · 2015
9. ASTM D7181-20 · 2020
10. 10.1080/10298436.2011.55260510.1080/10298436.2011.552605 ↗
11. Boudreau R. L. · 2003
12. 10.1520/STP15682013001410.1520/STP156820130014 ↗
13. 10.1061/JSFEAQ.000062910.1061/JSFEAQ.0000629 ↗
14. 10.1139/T07-04010.1139/T07-040 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000179610.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001796 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10346-018-01129-910.1007/s10346-018-01129-9 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11629-016-4303-x10.1007/s11629-016-4303-x ↗
18. 10.1016/S0013-7952(99)00123-410.1016/S0013-7952(99)00123-4 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.11.00810.1016/j.trgeo.2018.11.008 ↗
20. Douglas R. A. · 2016
21. Edil T. B. · Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions · 2018 · 7 · 482
22. EN 13286-7 · 2004
23. 10.1080/14680629.2012.68238310.1080/14680629.2012.682383 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.08.00910.1016/j.trgeo.2017.08.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.02810.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.028 ↗
26. Golder. (2019). Environmental impact assessment and environmental management programme report for the proposed Metsimaholo underground coal mine.
27. 10.1139/t06-02810.1139/t06-028 ↗
28. 10.1080/14680629.2021.192423510.1080/14680629.2021.1924235 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.10052510.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100525 ↗
30. 10.1080/1064119X.2016.116849810.1080/1064119X.2016.1168498 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10040-019-02084-y10.1007/s10040-019-02084-y ↗
32. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.10028410.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100284 ↗
33. James M. · 2013
34. 10.3141/1615-0610.3141/1615-06 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.03.01110.1016/j.coldregions.2009.03.011 ↗
36. 10.1061/40776(155)510.1061/40776(155)5 ↗
37. 10.1080/1029843070134287410.1080/10298430701342874 ↗
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000246410.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002464 ↗
39. Laverdière A. · 2019
40. 10.1061/9780784412978.04210.1061/9780784412978.042 ↗
41. 10.3208/jgssp.v07.08910.3208/jgssp.v07.089 ↗
42. 10.1139/cgj-2016-015210.1139/cgj-2016-0152 ↗
43. 10.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.000014210.1061/(ASCE)CR.1943-5495.0000142 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.10029110.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100291 ↗
45. 10.1002/nag.102310.1002/nag.1023 ↗
46. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000052310.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000523 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.13710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.137 ↗
48. Molenaar, A. A. (2008). Repeated load CBR testing, a simple but effective tool for the characterization of fine soils and unbound materials.
49. NCHRP. (2004). Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures (Final Rep. No. 1-37A).
50. 10.1139/t93-02010.1139/t93-020 ↗
51. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102638210.1080/14680629.2015.1026382 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.11.00310.1016/j.trgeo.2014.11.003 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.10543410.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105434 ↗
54. 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(2002)16:1(28)10.1061/(ASCE)0887-381X(2002)16:1(28) ↗
55. 10.1061/9780784413272.35110.1061/9780784413272.351 ↗
56. Tannant D. · 2001
57. Thompson R. · 2019
58. Thompson R. J. · 2011
59. 10.1080/0920811970894407510.1080/09208119708944075 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.10037310.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100373 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.10.00310.1016/j.coldregions.2018.10.003 ↗
62. Tremblay, G. & Hogan, C. (2001). Mend manual: Volume 1, summary.
63. 10.1061/9780784413272.36110.1061/9780784413272.361 ↗
64. 10.1016/S0165-232X(00)00009-410.1016/S0165-232X(00)00009-4 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.10583210.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105832 ↗