Towards a unified performance based characterisation of bitumen and mastic using the DSR
Source abstract
Abstract
A laboratory study was done on three bitumen of penetration grade 50/70 from three sources and three corresponding mastics made using these three base bitumen and one filler – Limestone. The tests were all done using the Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR), including frequency sweeps for rheology, single stress creep recovery test (SSCR) for permanent deformation behaviour, Dresden cryogenic test (DDCT) for low temperature performance, and fatigue testing using column specimen. The frequency sweep data was modelled using the 2 Spring-2 Parabolic-1 Dashpot (2S2P1D) rheological model. Selected tests were carried out on unaged and aged bitumen and mastic samples to investigate the sensitivity of the materials to ageing. Performance diagrams were made which could enable in bitumen and mastic selection based on specified desired criteria. It was found that bitumen from different bitumen producers and provenances had different performance behaviours. Furthermore, the addition of the limestone filler also affect the ranking based on specified behaviours.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geophysical Methods and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Urban Planning and Pavement Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Funding
German Research Foundation
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Alfaqawi, R., Airey, G. D. & Grenfell, J. R. A. (2017, June 28–30). Effects of mineral fillers and bitumen on ageing of asphalt mastics properties. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, BCRRA June 2017. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315100333-4110.1201/9781315100333-37 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.00810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.008 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.04210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.042 ↗
4. 10.1080/1029843090303335410.1080/10298430903033354 ↗
5. Di Benedetto H. · International Journal of Geomechanics · 2007 · 7
6. European Committee for Standardization (CEN). (2012). EN 12697-46:2012 – Test methods for hot mix asphalt – Part 46: Low temperature cracking and properties by uniaxial tension tests.
7. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
8. Forschungsgesellschaft für Straßen- und Verkehrswesen (FGSV). (2007). TL Asphalt-StB 07, Technische Lieferbedingungen für Asphaltmischgut für den Bau von Verkehrsflächenbefestigungen.
9. Forschungsgesellschaft für Straßen- und Verkehrswesen (FGSV). (2011). TL Gestein StB – Technische Lieferbedingungen für Gesteinskörnungen im Straßenbau.
10. Gehrke M. · 2017
11. 10.1080/14680629.2013.81881810.1080/14680629.2013.818818 ↗
12. 10.3141/2207-1310.3141/2207-13 ↗
13. Hospodka, M., Hofko, B. & Blab, R. (2017). Zur Ermüdungsbeständigkeit von Asphaltmastix Prüfmethodik und Einflussparameter. Fifth Dresdener Asphalttage.
14. Hospodka M. · Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions · 2018 · 51
15. 10.1080/1029843060081917010.1080/10298430600819170 ↗
16. 10.1680/tsbh.5837810.1680/tsbh.58378 ↗
17. 10.1787/9789282108000-en10.1787/9789282108000-en ↗
18. Kim Y.-R. · Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2004 · 16
19. 10.1201/9781315643274-5310.1201/9781315643274-53 ↗
20. 10.3141/1638-0710.3141/1638-07 ↗
21. 10.14311/EE.2016.08610.14311/EE.2016.086 ↗
22. Osman S. A. · 2004
23. Pravat, K. & Zhou, F. (2018). Evaluation of asphalt binder performance with laboratory and field test sections. Report No. FHWA/TX-18/0-6674-01-R1. https://static.tti.tamu.edu/tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6674-01-R1.pdf
24. 10.1080/14680629.2018.142821610.1080/14680629.2018.1428216 ↗
25. 10.1080/14680629.2020.177850810.1080/14680629.2020.1778508 ↗
26. 10.1007/978-3-030-48679-2_4610.1007/978-3-030-48679-2_46 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11697410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116974 ↗
28. Rowe, G. M. & Bouldin, M. G. (2000). Improved techniques to evaluate the fatigue resistance of asphaltic mixtures. 2nd Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress Barcelona.
29. 10.1080/10298436.2018.143861110.1080/10298436.2018.1438611 ↗
30. 10.3141/1832-0510.3141/1832-05 ↗
31. 10.14311/EE.2016.05510.14311/EE.2016.055 ↗
32. Vonk W. · Zeitschrift Bitumen · 2003 · 4 · 166
33. 10.3141/2208-0510.3141/2208-05 ↗
34. Wegmann, M., Vienenkötter, L. & Pfitzmann, M. (2016, June 30). Bitumen quality recording – A German approach. Proceedings of 6th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress. https://doi.org/10.14311/EE.2016.33910.14311/EE.2016.339 ↗
35. Wellner, F., Falla, G. C. & Leischner, S. (2019). Betrachtungen zur Einschätzung der Bitumenqualitäten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Alterung. Proceedings of the Asphaltstraßentagung.
36. Woldekidan, M. F. (2011). Response Modelling of Bitumen, Bituminous Mastic and Mortar. In Dissertation for The Degree of Doctor, Technische Universiteit Delft.
37. 10.1061/41186(421)34210.1061/41186(421)342 ↗
38. Yusoff N. I. · Unimas E-Journal of Civil Engineering · 2014 · 1
39. 10.3141/2632-0910.3141/2632-09 ↗