Discrete element modelling of hot mix asphalt complex modulus using realistic aggregate shapes
Source abstract
Abstract
To assess the mechanical response under traffic of asphalt mixtures, a typical practice is to perform a complex modulus test. In this work, the complex modulus test is reproduced numerically for an asphalt mixture by 3D simulations carried out with the LMGC90 code. A viscoelastic contact law is used to handle the interaction between particles with irregular shapes. The numerical aggregates were generated using the particle size distribution (PSD), the flakiness index (FI), and statistic data of actual aggregates, without using complex imaging techniques. Experimental and numerical testing campaigns were conducted for the complex modulus test on trapezoidal samples in a two-point bending (2PB) configuration. The numerical model was able to reproduce the mechanical performances obtained during the experimental tests, regarding the viscoelastic properties of the material. The influence on the mechanical performances of particle shape considering irregular aggregate was analysed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Granular flow and fluidized beds · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ICUBE, UMR 7357, CNRS, INSA de Strasbourg
Funding
French National Research Agency
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2007)7:2(131)10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2007)7:2(131) ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevE.66.02130110.1103/PhysRevE.66.021301 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.12.01310.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.12.013 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.06220310.1103/PhysRevE.87.062203 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.01.02110.1016/j.mechmat.2009.01.021 ↗
6. 10.1080/14680629.2020.176654510.1080/14680629.2020.1766545 ↗
7. Betten, J. (2008). Creep mechanics. Springer Science & Business Media.
8. 10.1103/PhysRevE.53.538210.1103/PhysRevE.53.5382 ↗
9. 10.1007/978-1-4471-0557-210.1007/978-1-4471-0557-2 ↗
10. 10.3141/1757-1310.3141/1757-13 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.sandf.2013.12.00210.1016/j.sandf.2013.12.002 ↗
12. 10.1051/epjconf/20171400701610.1051/epjconf/201714007016 ↗
13. 10.1080/14680629.2010.969027410.1080/14680629.2010.9690274 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.01.00710.1016/j.compgeo.2009.01.007 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10035-006-0013-310.1007/s10035-006-0013-3 ↗
16. 10.3141/1832-1210.3141/1832-12 ↗
17. 10.1080/14680629.2021.191183310.1080/14680629.2021.1911833 ↗
18. Cundall P. A. (1971). A computer model for simulating progressive large scale movement in blocky rock systems. In Proceedings of the symposium of the international society for rock mechanics society for rock mechanics (ISRM). Ecole nationale superieure de geologie appliquee et de prospection miniere (Vol. 2 pp. 129–136).
19. 10.1016/0148-9062(88)92293-010.1016/0148-9062(88)92293-0 ↗
20. 10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.4710.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47 ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:2(163)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:2(163) ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.005 ↗
23. Dubois F. & Jean M. (2003). Lmgc90. In Actes du sixieme colloque national en calcul des structures. AFM (Vol. 1 pp. 111–118).
24. En 12697-26. (2012). Bituminous mixtures. Test methods for hot mix asphalt. Part 26: Stiffness (AFNOR ed.). [Computer software manual].
25. 10.1520/JTE2019020910.1520/JTE20190209 ↗
26. 10.1155/2019/696239410.1155/2019/6962394 ↗
27. 10.1080/14680629.2018.147328210.1080/14680629.2018.1473282 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00161005008910.1007/s001610050089 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00383-110.1016/S0045-7825(98)00383-1 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2007)7:2(102)10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2007)7:2(102) ↗
31. 10.1016/j.finel.2012.08.00410.1016/j.finel.2012.08.004 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.09610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.096 ↗
33. Liu Y. & You Z. (2009). Determining Burger's model parameters of asphalt materials using creep-recovery testing data. In Pavements and materials: Modeling testing and performance. ASCE (pp. 26–36).10.1061/41008(334)3 ↗
34. LMGC90. (2021). https://git-xen.lmgc.univ-montp2.fr/lmgc90/lmgc90_user/-/wikis/home
35. 10.1007/s10035-006-0021-310.1007/s10035-006-0021-3 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00139-410.1016/S0045-7949(98)00139-4 ↗
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1106)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1106) ↗
38. 10.1080/1748602090285570410.1080/17486020902855704 ↗
39. 10.1007/978-3-7091-2624-0_110.1007/978-3-7091-2624-0_1 ↗
40. Moreau, J. J. (1994). Some numerical methods in multibody dynamics: Application to granular materials. European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, supp.4, 93–114.
41. Nguyen M. Froiio F. Cambou B. Di Benedetto H. & Sauzéat C. (2016).
42. 10.1051/jp1:199520810.1051/jp1:1995208 ↗
43. Python Software Foundation. (2021). https://www.python.org/
44. 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.03130810.1103/PhysRevE.86.031308 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.10325510.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103255 ↗
46. 10.1051/epjconf/20171400800910.1051/epjconf/201714008009 ↗
47. Radjaï, F., & Dubois, F. (2011). Discrete-element modeling of granular materials. Wiley-Iste.
48. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2009.01.02810.1016/j.mechmat.2009.01.028 ↗
49. 10.1209/0295-5075/98/4400810.1209/0295-5075/98/44008 ↗
50. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000038610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000386 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.03610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.036 ↗
52. 10.1080/14680629.2017.139623610.1080/14680629.2017.1396236 ↗