Measuring surface texture of in-service asphalt pavement: evaluation of two proposed hand-portable methods
Source abstract
Abstract
Road managers require convenient, inexpensive methods to quickly assess pavement conditions over large areas. New imaging technologies potentially offer a substantial improvement over current methods. In this study, two hand-portable methods based on widely available consumer-grade technology were tested across a range of pavement conditions. To place the proposed methods in a familiar context, data were compared with the mean texture depth (MTD) calculated by the widely used volumetric method. MTD provided the clearest distinction between experimental roughness classes. Spatial pattern analysis (fractal dimension) of digital images discriminated between light, moderate and severe deterioration but failed to make fine distinctions between degrees of moderate wear. Three-dimensional models constructed by stereoscopic infrared scanning distinguished between all but the smoothest texture classes. It appears that both the proposed methods have potential for accurate, quick and convenient assessment of pavement macrotexture at little expense, although some judgement must be used in their application.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Environmental and Plant Biology, Porter Hall, Ohio University, Athens, USA
Department of Civil Engineering, Stocker Hall, Ohio University, Athens, USA
TEC Engineering Inc., Dayton, USA
Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, USA
Funding
Ohio Department of Transportation
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. Adlinge S. S. · International Journal of Innovative Research and Development · 2013 · 2 · 437
2. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.10910.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.109 ↗
3. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (1976). Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. Washington, DC.
4. Artec 3D. (2020). Artec 3D applications in art and design. Retrieved October 12, 2020 from https://www.artec3d.com/cases/design.
5. ASTM D6433-03 · 2003
6. ASTM E965-06 · 2006
7. 10.1093/nar/gks58610.1093/nar/gks586 ↗
8. 10.1007/978-1-4899-1397-510.1007/978-1-4899-1397-5 ↗
9. 10.3390/s12070911010.3390/s120709110 ↗
10. 10.1098/rsbl.2014.098410.1098/rsbl.2014.0984 ↗
11. British Standards Institute. (2011). British Standards Document BS EN 13036-1 Road and airfield surface characteristics. Test methods. Measurement of pavement surface macrotexture depth using a volumetric patch technique. Retrieved March 22, 2021 from https://landingpage.bsigroup.com/LandingPage/Undated?UPI=000000000030022185.
12. Cairney, P. (1997). Skid resistance and crashes – a review of the literature. ARRB Transportation Research, Research Report ARR 311.
13. 10.1080/14680629.2015.101654710.1080/14680629.2015.1016547 ↗
14. 10.1080/10298436.2015.106600510.1080/10298436.2015.1066005 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.wear.2011.05.02410.1016/j.wear.2011.05.024 ↗
16. Computer Aided Technology. (2021). Creaform 3D Scanners. https://www.cati.com/3d-scanning/creaform-3d-scanners/
17. 10.1007/978-3-662-44719-2_410.1007/978-3-662-44719-2_4 ↗
18. 10.1088/2051-672X/3/4/04300110.1088/2051-672X/3/4/043001 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.wear.2008.04.06010.1016/j.wear.2008.04.060 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11669310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116693 ↗
21. 10.1080/14680629.2016.116083510.1080/14680629.2016.1160835 ↗
22. 10.1080/10298436.2010.54685810.1080/10298436.2010.546858 ↗
23. 10.3141/1860-1910.3141/1860-19 ↗
24. Hall, J. W., Smith, K. L., Titus-Glover, L., Wambold, J. C., Yager, T. J. & Rado, Z. (2009). Guide for Pavement Friction, Final Report for NCHRP Project 01-43, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, DC.
25. Hartigan Shea R. · National Geographic · 2019
26. Henry, J. J. (2000). Evaluation of pavement friction characteristics. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 291, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Washington, D.C.
27. Hoffman T. · PC Magazine · 2014
28. 10.1155/2016/893129510.1155/2016/8931295 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.08810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.088 ↗
30. 10.2307/194266110.2307/1942661 ↗
31. ISO 13473-1:2019. (2019). Characterization of pavement texture by use of surface profiles — Part 1: Determination of mean profile depth. International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:13473:1:ed-2:v1:en
32. 10.1520/ACEM2016003610.1520/ACEM20160036 ↗
33. IWS Messtechnik (2021). ELAtextur 3.0. http://www.laier.be/files/iws_elatextur_en.pdf Accessed 3/21/21
34. 10.1029/2011JF00228910.1029/2011JF002289 ↗
35. 10.1080/10298436.2014.97295610.1080/10298436.2014.972956 ↗
36. Karperien, A. (2013). User's guide for FracLac, V. 2.5. https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/plugins/fraclac/FLHelp/Introduction.htm accessed 10/24/20
37. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126172710.1080/14680629.2016.1261727 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.00210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.002 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10826510.1016/j.measurement.2020.108265 ↗
40. 10.3141/2591-1410.3141/2591-14 ↗
41. 10.1126/science.156.3775.63610.1126/science.156.3775.636 ↗
42. Mandelbrot B. B. · 1982
43. Meegoda J. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2005 · 5 · 30510.1520/JTE12343 ↗
44. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000091210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000912 ↗
45. Millar P. · International Journal of Pavements · 2010 · 10 · 39
46. 10.1080/10298436.2015.103900510.1080/10298436.2015.1039005 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0960-0779(97)00085-410.1016/S0960-0779(97)00085-4 ↗
48. Pasetto M. · 2007
49. 10.1007/BF0012535110.1007/BF00125351 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.05010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.050 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.02110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.021 ↗
52. R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/
53. 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z ↗
54. 10.1109/21.25969210.1109/21.259692 ↗
55. Shahin, M. & Kohn, S. (1981). Pavement maintenance for roads and parking lots. Technical Report M-294. Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, US Army Corps of Engineers.
56. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.004 ↗
57. 10.3141/1699-0110.3141/1699-01 ↗
58. Transtec Group. (2021). Texture services. Retrieved March 21, 2021 from https://www.thetranstecgroup.com/pavement- surface-characteristics/texture/.
59. Turcotte D. L. · 1992
60. 10.1016/j.wear.2014.08.01310.1016/j.wear.2014.08.013 ↗
61. Wambold, J. C., Antle, C. E., Henry, J. J., Rado, Z., Descornet, G., Sandberg, U., Gothié, M. & Huschek, S. (1995). International PIARC experiment to compare and harmonize texture and skid resistance measurement; Final report, No. 011.043, to the Technical Committee on Surface Characteristics; World Road Association (PIARC): Coatings 2020,10, 42412 of 13.
62. 10.1080/14680629.2018.143371010.1080/14680629.2018.1433710 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.02110.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021 ↗
64. Willway, T., Reeves, S. & Baldachin, L. (2008). Maintaining pavements in a changing climate. The Stationary Office.
65. 10.1117/12.95674010.1117/12.956740 ↗
66. 10.3390/coatings1009083210.3390/coatings10090832 ↗
67. Yaacob H. · Jurnal Teknolgi · 2012 · 70 · 103
68. 10.1007/978-1-4899-3035-410.1007/978-1-4899-3035-4 ↗
69. Z Corporation · 2021
70. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.01510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.015 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.triboint.2020.10658910.1016/j.triboint.2020.106589 ↗