journal article·2022-06-03

Performance-based laboratory evaluation of asphaltic mixture containing asphalt binder-Carbon Nano Tube composite

Prabin Kumar Ashish, Dharamveer Singh

Publisher page

Abstract

This research work aimed to evaluate the effect of CNT on the performance of asphaltic mixture. CNT-asphalt binder composite was initially prepared at different CNT dosages (0%, 0.4%, 0.75%, 1.5%, and 2.25% by the weight of asphalt binder). The effect of CNT on the workability of asphaltic mixture was evaluated with the help of compaction data. The change in compaction densification index indicated that such an addition will have a negative impact on the workability of asphaltic mixture. Similarly, the strain response and flow number obtained from the dynamic creep test at 50°C indicated that the addition of CNT will help in improving the rutting performance. Likewise, the variation of Tensile Strength Ratio (TSR) value indicated that the moisture damage resistivity potential of asphaltic mixture can be improved with the addition of CNT. Finally, intermediate temperature performance was evaluated using indirect tensile fatigue and indirect tensile test-based cracking tolerance index. The variation of different parameters from the above approaches indicated that CNT can help in improving the intermediate temperature performance of asphaltic mixture.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India

Funding

None

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pen.76016051210.1002/pen.760160512 ↗
2. 10.3141/2505-0810.3141/2505-08 ↗
3. 10.1111/ffe.1240810.1111/ffe.12408 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.16810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.168 ↗
5. Amirkhanian A. N. · International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology · 2011 · 4 · 281
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000030910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000309 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.03510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.035 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000210610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002106 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.19910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.199 ↗
10. Ashish P. K. · International Journal of Pavement Engineering · 2020 · 1
11. Asphalt Institute · 2014 · 65
12. ASTM. (2014). “Standard Test Method for Effect of Moisture on Asphalt Concrete Paving Mixtures.” ASTM D4867, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
13. ASTM. (2017). “Standard Test Method for Indirect Tensile (IDT) Strength of Asphalt Mixtures.” ASTM D6931, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
14. ASTM. (2019). “Standard Test Method for Determination of Cracking Tolerance Index of Asphalt Mixture Using the Indirect Tensile Cracking Test at Intermediate Temperature.” ASTM D8225, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
15. 10.1063/1.157956810.1063/1.1579568 ↗
16. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138907810.1080/14680629.2017.1389078 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.03310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.033 ↗
18. EN 12697-24. (2012). Bituminous mixtures—Test methods for hot mix asphalt. Part 24: Resistance to fatigue.European Committee for Standardization, Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels.
19. 10.1080/14680629.2014.100094310.1080/14680629.2014.1000943 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000191010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001910 ↗
21. 10.3390/app812265110.3390/app8122651 ↗
22. Kumar G. S. · Advances in Civil Engineering Materials · 2018 · 7 · 13210.1520/ACEM20170060 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.23710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.237 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.01.03110.1016/j.carbon.2005.01.031 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.09410.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.094 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000014610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000146 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.07410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.074 ↗
28. MoRTH · 2013
29. Newcomb, D. & Zhou, F. (2018). Balanced Design of Asphalt Mixtures (No. MN/RC 2018-22).Minnesota. Dept. of Transportation. Research Services & Library.
30. 10.1080/14680629.2019.160828910.1080/14680629.2019.1608289 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.02410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.024 ↗
32. 10.1080/10298436.2014.92309910.1080/10298436.2014.923099 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.05.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.05.008 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.90510.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.905 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11043-016-9301-410.1007/s11043-016-9301-4 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.07.04710.1016/j.cplett.2004.07.047 ↗
37. 10.3390/ma1004041610.3390/ma10040416 ↗
38. 10.1080/14680629.2013.87109110.1080/14680629.2013.871091 ↗
39. West, R. C., Watson, D. E., Turner, P. A. & Casola, J. R. (2010). Mixing and compaction temperatures of asphalt binders in hot-mix asphalt.National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Project 9-39, NCHRP report no. 648.10.17226/14367 ↗
40. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000018410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000184 ↗
41. 10.1080/10298436.2011.56026710.1080/10298436.2011.560267 ↗
42. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138908210.1080/14680629.2017.1389082 ↗