Analysis of a moving measurement platform based on line profile sensors for project-level pavement evaluation
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, there has been renewed interest in developing Moving Measurement Platforms (MMPs) to replace the Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) which currently serves as the industry standard for project-level pavement evaluation. The purpose of this study was to contribute to the transition efforts from FWD to MMPs. While focusing on a new MMP device (called Raptor) based on line profile sensing technology, the work addressed three fundamental aspects needed for eventual field data assessment and industry acceptance: (i) Loading and measurement setup – presenting an innovative device consisting of a beam equipped with several line profilers and also motion tracking sensors. By means of image analysis, this configuration allows for tracking a point on the pavement surface and measuring displacement information while moving. (ii) Interpretation method – capable of accepting device-measured data as input, and providing elastic properties for a layered pavement model. (iii) Sensitivity to measurement errors – where the interpretation method is first validated and then interrogated for error effects on the inferred moduli. Overall, the obtained results provide basic confidence in the device and the interpretation method, and demonstrate that the technology has the potential to meet project-level pavement evaluation needs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
FOSS, Hillerød, Denmark
Funding
Innovation Fund Denmark
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:2(288)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1994)120:2(288) ↗
2. Andersen, S., Levenberg, E. & Andersen, M. (2017, June 28–30). Inferring pavement layer properties from a moving measurement platform. The 10th international conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields (BCRRA), Athens, Greece (pp. 675–682).10.1201/9781315100333-90 ↗
3. Andersen S. · International Journal of Pavement Engineering · 2018 · 21 · 1
4. ASTM-D4694 · 2015
5. ASTM-D4695 · 2015
6. Baltzer, S., Tønnesen, P., Gleerup, S., Holst, M. L. & Thorup, C. (2017). Design of pavements and reinforcement layers. Vejregler – Danish Road Directorate, Ministry of Transport, Building and Housing.
7. Briggs, R. C., Johnson, R. F., Stubstad, R. N. & Pierce, L. (1999). A comparison of the rolling weight deflectometer with the falling weight deflectometer. ASTM Special Technical Publication, (1375), pp. 444–456.10.1520/STP14783S ↗
8. 10.1063/1.170755810.1063/1.1707558 ↗
9. 10.3141/1869-1310.3141/1869-13 ↗
10. Chou Y. · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 1991 · 1293 · 72
11. 10.3141/2641-0610.3141/2641-06 ↗
12. 10.1139/cjce-2017-057010.1139/cjce-2017-0570 ↗
13. 10.3141/2525-0210.3141/2525-02 ↗
14. Flintsch, G., Katicha, S., Bryce, J., Ferne, B., Nell, S. & Diefenderfer, B. (2013). Assessment of continuous pavement deflection measuring technologies (No. SHRP 2 Report S2-R06F-RW-1).10.17226/22766 ↗
15. 10.1080/17415977.2016.119107310.1080/17415977.2016.1191073 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2005.10.00110.1016/j.advengsoft.2005.10.001 ↗
17. Graczyk, M., Zofka, A., Sudyka, J. & Rafa, J. (2014). Analytical solution of pavement deflections and its application to the TSD measurements. In 26th Arrb Conference 2014, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
18. Gressin, J. (1982, June 23–25). The Lacroix-LPC Deflectograph. In Proceedings of a International Symposium on Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields (Vol. 1), Trondheim.
19. 10.1007/978-94-009-5819-710.1007/978-94-009-5819-7 ↗
20. Harr, M. E. & Elton, D. J. (1983). Non-contact, non-destructive airport pavement profile, texture and deflection measurements (Technical Report). Purdue University Lafayette In School of Civil Engineering.
21. Harr, M. & Ng-A-Qui, N. (1977). Noncontact nondestructive determination of pavement deflection under moving loads (Technical Report). Purdue Research Foundation Lafayette In.
22. Herr, W. J., Hall, J. W., White, T. D. & Johnson, W. (1995, October 22–26). Continuous deflection basin measurement and backcalculation under a rolling wheel load using scanning laser technology. Transportation congress proceedings, San Diego, California (Vol. 1, pp. 600–611).
23. Horak, E., Maina, A. H. J. & Emery, S. (2014). Structuralnumber determined with the falling weight deflectometer and used as benchmark methodology. IEEE Proceedings Hong Kong.
24. Huang, Y. H. (2004). Pavement analysis and design (2nd ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:1(82)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:1(82) ↗
26. 10.1177/036119810519050010710.1177/0361198105190500107 ↗
27. Irwin, L., Yang, W. & Stubstad, R. (1989). Deflection reading accuracy and layer thickness accuracy in backcalculation of pavement layer moduli. In G. Baladi & A. (Eds.), Bush nondestructive testing of pavements and backcalculation of moduli, STP1026-EB (pp. 229–244). ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP19810S10.1520/STP19810S ↗
28. 10.3141/2367-0510.3141/2367-05 ↗
29. Khazanovich L. · 2001
30. Kilareski, W. P. & Anani, B. A. (1982, August 23–26). Evaluation of in-situ moduli and pavement life from deflection basins. 5th international conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, The Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands, Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 349–366).
31. 10.1002/nag.113210.1002/nag.1132 ↗
32. 10.3141/2525-0110.3141/2525-01 ↗
33. Levenberg E. · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2018
34. Levenberg E. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2004 · 32 · 110.1520/JTE11804 ↗
35. 10.1080/14680629.2017.130726310.1080/14680629.2017.1307263 ↗
36. 10.1520/JTE2016018910.1520/JTE20160189 ↗
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:1(25)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2003)15:1(25) ↗
38. 10.1080/10298436.2012.71564610.1080/10298436.2012.715646 ↗
39. Nasimifar, M., Siddharthan, R. S., Hajj, E. Y. & Motamed, R. (2016). Investigation of 3D-move responses under traffic speed deflection devices (TSDDs). In J. P. Aguiar-Moya, A. Vargas-Nordcbeck, F. Leiva-Villacorta, & L. G. Loría-Salazar (Eds.), The roles of accelerated pavement testing in pavement sustainability (pp. 161–176). Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-42797-3_11 ↗
40. 10.1080/10298436.2015.108815210.1080/10298436.2015.1088152 ↗
41. 10.3141/2641-0910.3141/2641-09 ↗
42. 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.30810.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 ↗
43. 10.1080/0144619920000004010.1080/01446199200000040 ↗
44. Pedersen, L. (2013). Viscoelastic modelling of road deflections for use with the traffic speed deflectometer. Technical University of Denmark. IMM-PHD-2013, No. 310.
45. Raftey J. · 1991
46. 10.1080/10298436.2013.78607810.1080/10298436.2013.786078 ↗
47. Siddharthan R. · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 1996 · 1377 · 57
48. Simonin, J. M., Geffard, J. L. & Hornych, P. (2015). Performance of deflection measurement equipment and data interpretation in France. In International symposium non-destructive testing in civil engineering (NDT-CE), Berlin, Alemania.
49. Simonin, J., Lièvre, D., Rasmussen, S. & Hildebrand, G. (2005). Assessment of the Danish high speed deflectograph in France. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields (Vol. 10), Trondheim Norway.
50. Sivaneswaran N. · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 1991 · 1293 · 93
51. SPT1026 · 1989 · 1
52. SPT1198 · 1994 · 2
53. SPT1375 · 2000 · 3
54. 10.3141/1716-0210.3141/1716-02 ↗
55. Ullidtz P. · 1987
56. Uzan, J. (1994). Advanced backcalculation techniques. In A. Bush, H. Q. Von, & G. Baladi (Eds.), Nondestructive testing of pavements and backcalculation of moduli (Vol. 2, pp. 3–37). ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP18139S10.1520/STP18139S ↗
57. 10.3141/2369-0510.3141/2369-05 ↗
58. Von Quintus, H. & Simpson, A. (2002). Back-calculation of layer parameters for LTPP test sections, volume II: Layered elastic analysis for flexible and rigid pavements (Vol. RD-01-113; Technical Report). Federal Highway Administration, FHWA-RD-01-113.
59. Wilke, P. W. (2015, May 18–21). Network Level structural evaluation with rolling wheel deflectometer. 9th international conference on managing pavement assets, Washington, DC .
60. Wilson, A. (1982, September). Experiments in probabilistic cost modelling. Building cost techniques: New directions (transactions of building cost research conference), Portsmouth Polytechnic (pp. 169–180).
61. 10.1002/nag.76910.1002/nag.769 ↗
62. Zofka, A., Graczyk, M. & Rafa, J. (2015). Qualitative evaluation of stochastic factors affecting the Traffic Speed Deflectometer results. In Transportation research board 94th annual meeting, Washington, DC.
63. 10.3141/2457-0210.3141/2457-02 ↗