Rheological and performance characterisation of the bitumen recovered from different emulsions for cold mixtures
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, over-stabilized polymer-modified bitumen emulsions have been widely used to improve the mechanical properties of cold bituminous mixtures. However, the effect of the polymer modification process on the emulsion performance have not been investigated. The present paper deals with the analysis of the binders recovered from a reference unmodified bitumen emulsion and two polymer-modified emulsions, respectively including SBR-latex added after bitumen emulsification (post-blending) and SBS added before bitumen emulsification (pre-blending). The laboratory investigation included the linear viscoelastic characterisation and the evaluation of the resistance to permanent deformations and damage. The results showed that the polymer-modified bitumen emulsions have a more pronounced elasticity with respect to the unmodified emulsion, allowing achieving a higher performance against permanent deformations and fatigue. In addition, the SBS modified bitumen emulsion (pre-blending) has better properties than the latex modified emulsion (post-blending), as a consequence of the different chemical structure that the modification process produces.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Construction, Civil Engineering and Architecture, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
Faculty of Engineering, eCampus University, Novedrate, Italy
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO TP 101-14. (2014).Standard method of test for estimating fatigue resistance of asphalt binders using the linear amplitude sweep.
2. 10.1520/JTE2018003110.1520/JTE20180031 ↗
3. 10.1080/10916466.2016.121460010.1080/10916466.2016.1214600 ↗
4. 10.1080/10916466.2017.131938610.1080/10916466.2017.1319386 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000271410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002714 ↗
6. ANAS · 2010
7. Bocci M. · International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology · 2010 · 3 · 171
8. Bocci E. · 2020 · 48 · 313
9. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.03510.1016/j.proeng.2017.02.035 ↗
10. Carrera V. · Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions · 2014 · 48 · 3407
11. 10.1016/j.ces.2016.09.01810.1016/j.ces.2016.09.018 ↗
12. 10.1080/14680629.2004.968999210.1080/14680629.2004.9689992 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11880810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118808 ↗
14. EN 12848. (2009).Bitumen and bituminous binders – determination of mixing stability with cement of bitumen emulsions.
15. EN 13074-1. (2019).Bitumen and bituminous binders – recovery of binder from bituminous emulsion or cut-back or fluxed bituminous binders. Part 1: Recovery by evaporation.
16. EN 13808. (2013).Bitumen and bituminous binders – framework for specifying cationic bituminous emulsions.
17. EN 14770. (2012).Bitumen and bituminous binders – determination of complex shear modulus and phase angle – dynamic shear rheometer (DSR).
18. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
19. Ferry J. D. · 1980
20. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00955.x10.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00955.x ↗
21. 10.1122/1.350352910.1122/1.3503529 ↗
22. Godenzoni C. · Transport Infrastructure and Systems – Proceedings of the AIIT International Congress on Transport Infrastructure and Systems, TIS 2017 · 2017 · 2017 · 185
23. 10.1080/19648189.2016.121997210.1080/19648189.2016.1219972 ↗
24. 10.3141/2207-1310.3141/2207-13 ↗
25. 10.1080/10298436.2018.143588210.1080/10298436.2018.1435882 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.09310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.093 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.01.04510.1016/j.colsurfa.2016.01.045 ↗
28. King G. · RILEM Bookseries · 2012 · 4 · 45310.1007/978-94-007-4566-7_44 ↗
29. 10.1533/9780857093721.1.2510.1533/9780857093721.1.25 ↗
30. 10.1122/1.55076410.1122/1.550764 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.26710.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.267 ↗
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:3(398)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:3(398) ↗
33. 10.1080/14680629.2003.968994610.1080/14680629.2003.9689946 ↗
34. 10.3390/ma1215241410.3390/ma12152414 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.30110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.301 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.12910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.129 ↗
37. 10.1520/JTE2013024510.1520/JTE20130245 ↗
38. Ruggles, C. S. (2004). The efficient use of environmentally-friendly natural rubber latex in road construction–past, present and future. SeminarRubber in Transport, Breda, Netherlands, 2004.
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000236710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002367 ↗
40. 10.17226/2324610.17226/23246 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.004 ↗
42. Shafii M. · International Journal of Civil & Environmental Engineering · 2011 · 11
43. 10.1260/1708-5284.10.2.15910.1260/1708-5284.10.2.159 ↗
44. 10.1080/14680629.2013.77475210.1080/14680629.2013.774752 ↗
45. 10.1002/9783527647941.ch110.1002/9783527647941.ch1 ↗
46. Takamura, K. & Lubbers, C. (2000). Comparison of emulsion residues recovered by forced airflow and RTFO drying. InProceedings of ISSA/AEMA 2000(pp. 1–17).
47. Teymourpour, P. & Bahia, H. (2014). Linear amplitude sweep test: Binder grading specification and field validation.Binder Expert Task Group Meeting,Baton Rouge, USA, September 16th, 2014.
48. Waters, J. C., Bosma, G. M. & Herrington, P. R. (2008).Residual binder extraction from emulsions for quality assurance testing. NZ Transport Agency Research Report No 360.
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.006 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.03810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.038 ↗
51. Zhang R. · Test · 2007 · 1 · 292