The Role of Temperature and Binder Type on the Fracture Resistance of Asphalt Mixtures at Low Temperatures
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT In the past decade fracture mechanics concepts have been introduced to the study of the fracture behavior of asphalt mixtures. One of the main goals was to obtain reliable fracture properties that could be used in the selection of crack resistant material and in the development of performance models. This paper presents the results of an investigation of the low temperature properties of asphalt mixtures using a testing protocol and analyses based on the semi circular bend test. The load, the load-line displacement, and the crack mouth opening displacement were recorded during the test and used to calculate the stiffness, the fracture toughness, and fracture energy of three asphalt mixtures used in three test sections at MnROAD facility. The statistical analysis of the experimental data shows that both the fracture toughness and fracture energy are significantly affected by the type of asphalt binder used and the testing temperature. For all three mixtures the fracture energy decreased as the temperature dropped. However, the fracture toughness evolution showed a maximum value at approximately the PG low temperature limit of the binder.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Designation MP1a-02 · 2002
2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Designation T322–03 · 2003
3. 10.3141/1723-1610.3141/1723-16 ↗
4. Collop A. C. · IMechE Journal of Materials: Design and Applications · 2004 · 218 · 55
5. Dongre R. · Transportation Research Record · 1989 · 1228 · 94
6. Fromm H. J. · Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1972 · 41 · 383
7. Haas R. · Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1987 · 56 · 198
8. Hills J. F. · Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1966 · 35 · 292
9. 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-710.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7 ↗
10. 10.1617/2912143772.03110.1617/2912143772.031 ↗
11. Jacobs M. M.J. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1996 · 65 · 1
12. Jenq Y-S · Transportation Research Record · 1991 · 1317 · 90
13. 10.1016/S0950-0618(97)00030-510.1016/S0950-0618(97)00030-5 ↗
14. Labuz J. F. · 1994
15. Li X. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2004 · 73 · 401
16. Li X. · 2006
17. 10.1016/0013-7944(93)90030-V10.1016/0013-7944(93)90030-V ↗
18. Majidzadeh K. · Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1971 · 40 · 227
19. 10.3141/1789-2110.3141/1789-21 ↗
20. Marasteanu M. O. · 2004 · 249
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1997)123:5(405)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1997)123:5(405) ↗
22. Mohammad L. N. · 2004 · 375
23. Petersson P. E. · 1981
24. RILEM Technical Committee 50-FMC · Materials and Structures · 1985 · 285
25. Roque R. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1999 · 68 · 404
26. Roque R. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2004 · 73 · 229
27. Wagoner M. P. · ASTM Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2005 · 33 · 45210.1520/JTE12579 ↗
28. 10.1177/001448510505320510.1177/0014485105053205 ↗