VECD analysis to investigate the performance of long-term aged bio-asphalt mixtures compared to conventional asphalt mixtures
Source abstract
Abstract
The road industry is seeking solutions to reduce its dependency on petroleum-based products and its carbon footprint. This is leading to increasing interest in the so-called bio-binders, i.e. binders in which bitumen is partially replaced with bio-oils from renewable sources. Fatigue cracking is a major distress for flexible pavements and therefore the fatigue behaviour of innovative road materials (such as bio-asphalt mixtures) must be characterised in a reliable way. Within this framework, this study aims at comparing the fatigue behaviour of a bio-asphalt mixture and the corresponding conventional asphalt mixture. The two mixtures were laboratory-mixed and laboratory-compacted, and the only difference between them was the binder (a bio-binder containing 10% of wood-based bio-oil vs. a conventional bitumen having physical and rheological properties similar to the bio-binder). The mixtures were short- and long-term aged in the laboratory and subjected to complex modulus tests and cyclic fatigue tests. The results, analysed according to the viscoelastic continuum damage (VECD) theory, showed that, after short-term aging, the bio-asphalt mixture may be slightly stiffer and thus more prone to cracking than the control mixture due to a possible over-aging caused by the effects of high temperatures. However, the long-term aging susceptibility of the bio-asphalt mix was found to be less severe as compared to the control mix, leading to fatigue performance benefits in the long term and corroborating the results of previous investigations at the binder level. Overall, these findings further encourage the use of bio-binders as an alternative to traditional asphalt binders.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Edile, e Architettura (DICEA), Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO PP 99. (2019). Standard practice for preparation of small cylindrical performance test specimens using the Superpave gyratory compactor (SGC) or field cores.
2. AASHTO R 30. (2015). Standard practice for mixture conditioning of hot mix asphalt (HMA).
3. AASHTO TP 132. (2019). Standard method of test for determining the dynamic modulus for asphalt mixtures using small specimens in the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT).
4. AASHTO TP 133. (2019). Standard method of test for determining the damage characteristic curve and failure criterion using small specimens in the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT) cyclic fatigue test.
5. Autostrade per l’Italia. (2018). Capitolato speciale d’appalto – parte seconda: Norme tecniche di appalto.
6. 10.1080/14680629.2018.141871510.1080/14680629.2018.1418715 ↗
7. 10.1080/14680629.2019.156828710.1080/14680629.2019.1568287 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.27310.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.273 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jtte.2020.08.00210.1016/j.jtte.2020.08.002 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.06910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.069 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.06010.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.060 ↗
12. Chehab G. R. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2002 · 71 · 559
13. Christensen D. W. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2003 · 72 · 97
14. Daniel J. S. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2002 · 71 · 619
15. EN 12697-6. (2020). Bituminous mixtures – Test methods – Part 6: Determination of bulk density of bituminous specimens.
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000023710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000237 ↗
17. 10.3390/ma1404091810.3390/ma14040918 ↗
18. 10.3390/ma1302042010.3390/ma13020420 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.04810.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048 ↗
20. 10.1080/14680629.2009.969018510.1080/14680629.2009.9690185 ↗
21. 10.1617/s11527-019-1381-610.1617/s11527-019-1381-6 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.03410.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.034 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.10310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.103 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jtte.2019.04.00310.1016/j.jtte.2019.04.003 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12019310.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120193 ↗
26. 10.3390/app703021610.3390/app7030216 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.10110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.101 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.20610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.206 ↗
29. 10.1080/14680629.2015.109682010.1080/14680629.2015.1096820 ↗
30. Petersen, J. C. (2009). A review of the fundamentals of asphalt oxidation. Transportation Research Circular E-C140.
31. 10.1080/14680629.2011.971389510.1080/14680629.2011.9713895 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.19710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.197 ↗
33. 10.1080/14680629.2010.969033710.1080/14680629.2010.9690337 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12030910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120309 ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0114083710.1007/BF01140837 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.11810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.118 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.17310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.173 ↗
38. 10.1617/s11527-020-01506-810.1617/s11527-020-01506-8 ↗
39. 10.1080/1029843090339808810.1080/10298430903398088 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.03810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.038 ↗
41. 10.1080/10298436.2017.139410010.1080/10298436.2017.1394100 ↗
42. 10.1080/10298436.2020.175184410.1080/10298436.2020.1751844 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.01710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.017 ↗
44. 10.1177/036119811984647310.1177/0361198119846473 ↗