journal article·2019-02-17

Validity of aggregate packing models in mixture design of interlocking concrete block pavers (ICBP)

H.A.C.K. Hettiarachchi, W.K. Mampearachchi

Publisher page

Abstract

Interlocking concrete block pavers (ICBP) are manufactured using a semi dry concrete mix and vibration and compression are applied by electrical or hydraulic machines to cast the blocks. Hence the concrete mixture characteristics differ from concrete mixtures that we use for general purposes. When determining the mix proportions for the mix design, several properties of the block need to be considered. Maintaining required strength and surface texture, producing mixes with optimum water content to maintain the green strength while avoiding slumping are some of the challenges faced by the industry. To overcome such challenges a mix design using aggregate packing optimisation can be used effectively. There are number of theoretical packing models available for concrete mix optimisations and each model has its own pros and cons. Most of the models are successfully used for more generalised concrete applications and these models have not been used for more specialised applications such as ICBP. This study considers Modified Toufar model, three parameter model and compressible packing model to determine the validity of applying for ICBP. The theoretical models are compared with laboratory and field packing density experiments and the results indicate that the models are not accurately predicting the packing density for mix design of ICBP. Hence the study suggests developing a new theoretical packing model that accommodates production procedures together with mixture performances to enhance the mix design procedure as well as the performance of ICBP.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0032-5910(68)80006-310.1016/0032-5910(68)80006-3 ↗
2. Arivalagan S. · World Journal of Engineering Sciences · 2013 · 1 · 176
3. BS 812-2 · 1995
4. Chun Y. · 2007
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.08710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.087 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00861-X10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00861-X ↗
7. Fate S. · IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) · 2014 · 1 · 27
8. 10.1201/9781439828410.ch7110.1201/9781439828410.ch71 ↗
9. Fuller W. B. · Transactionas of the American Society of Civil Engineers · 1907 · 159 · 6710.1061/TACEAT.0001979 ↗
10. Goltermann P. · ACI Materials Journal · 1997 · 94 · 435
11. IS15658 · 2006
12. 10.1080/14680629.2003.968994810.1080/14680629.2003.9689948 ↗
13. Kantha Rao V. V. L. · IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) · 2014 · 11 · 34
14. KrishnaRao S. · International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) · 2013 · 2 · 1
15. 10.1617/s11527-007-9281-610.1617/s11527-007-9281-6 ↗
16. Ley T. · 2012
17. Mangulkar M. N. · International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research · 2013 · 4 · 143
18. Petersen I. F. · 1981
19. Powers T. C. · 1968
20. Priyanka A. J. · International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering · 2013 · 3 · 621
21. Richardson D. · 2005
22. SABS 1058 · 1985
23. Senthil Kumar V. · The Indian Concrete Journal · 2003 · 77 · 1324
24. SLS 1425 Part 2 · 2011
25. Taylor P. · 2012
26. Toufar W. · Freiberger Booklet A · 1976 · 558 · 29
27. Uma M. · International Journal of Engineering Research and General Science · 2015 · 3 · 138
28. 10.1080/14680629.2008.969016810.1080/14680629.2008.9690168 ↗
29. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1930.tb16222.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1930.tb16222.x ↗
30. 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.08.03610.1016/j.powtec.2014.08.036 ↗
31. Zeghichi L. · Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture · 2012 · 6 · 1429