journal article·2021-06-01

Study of air void topology of asphalt with focus on air void constrictions – a review and research approach

Barbara Schuck, Tim Teutsch, Stefan Alber, Wolfram Ressel, Holger Steeb, Matthias Ruf

Road Materials and Pavement Design· Volume 22· Issue sup1
Publisher page

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show the complexity of studying air void topology by giving an in-depth literature review. Factors defining air void structure are presented and relationships and correlations are highlighted. The hydraulic conductivity of asphalt is then put in context of air void analyses. A new approach to distinguish constrictions in the air void matrix is introduced. The bigger air voids represent the drainage (volumetric) capacity. The constrictions, on the other hand, have a direct influence on hydraulic conductivity, as clogging could easily diminish or eliminate them. This approach should improve the meaningfulness of studies analysing air void characteristics. With X-ray CT scans, an analysis of the middle section of two artificially soiled porous asphalt cores is then presented. As expected, approximately homogeneous behaviour of air voids as well as constrictions can be observed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute for Road and Transport Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany

Institute of Applied Mechanics, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.04.07210.1016/j.powtec.2019.04.072 ↗
2. 10.1617/s11527-016-0982-610.1617/s11527-016-0982-6 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.04310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.043 ↗
4. Alber, S. (2013). Veränderung des Schallabsorptionsverhaltens von offenporigen Asphalten durch Verschmutzung (Doctoral dissertation). University of Stuttgart. https://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/handle/11682/506
5. 10.1016/j.ijtst.2019.06.00110.1016/j.ijtst.2019.06.001 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.06910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.069 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.05610.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.056 ↗
8. Brown, E. R., Hainin, M. R. & Cooley, L. A. (2004). Relationships of HMA In-Place Air Voids, Lift Thickness, and Permeability. NCHRP Project, Transportation Research Board.
9. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.03010.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.07.030 ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000257310.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002573 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11789610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117896 ↗
12. 10.1029/JB093iB07p0772910.1029/JB093iB07p07729 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0317440910.1007/BF03174409 ↗
14. FGSV (Forschungsgesellschaft für Straßen- und Verkehrswesen). (2001). Technische Lieferbedingungen für gebrauchsfertige polymermodifizierte Bitumen (TL PmB). Withdrawn directive. Köln, Germany.
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11679110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116791 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.09410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.094 ↗
17. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.911.44310.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.911.443 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.13810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.138 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.phpro.2015.07.06310.1016/j.phpro.2015.07.063 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.331910.1103/PhysRevE.56.3319 ↗
21. 10.1080/14680629.2017.128335510.1080/14680629.2017.1283355 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.02410.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.024 ↗
23. 10.3141/2001-0410.3141/2001-04 ↗
24. 10.1080/1029843060081914710.1080/10298430600819147 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.14510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.145 ↗
26. 10.1061/JPEODX.000016110.1061/JPEODX.0000161 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.01.01510.1016/j.commatsci.2007.01.015 ↗
28. 10.1177/036119810619700010510.1177/0361198106197000105 ↗
29. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:2(122)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:2(122) ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11816310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118163 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11743010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117430 ↗
32. 10.3141/2195-1710.3141/2195-17 ↗
33. Ressel W. · Internationales Stuttgarter Symposium Automobil- und Motorentechnik · 2017 · 17 · 455
34. 10.1080/10298436.2017.134743710.1080/10298436.2017.1347437 ↗
35. 10.1080/10298436.2015.106599510.1080/10298436.2015.1065995 ↗
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:1(19)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:1(19) ↗
37. 10.1080/14680629.2009.969021210.1080/14680629.2009.9690212 ↗
38. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000074810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000748 ↗
39. Vivar E. · Asphalt Paving Technology: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists-Proceedings of the Technical Sessions · 2007 · 76 · 953
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.03210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.032 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.07110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.071 ↗
42. Zhang L. · International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology · 2013 · 6 · 520
43. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.05610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.056 ↗