journal article·2021-05-04

Effect of two novel bio-based rejuvenators on the performance of 50% RAP mixes – a statistical study on the complex modulus of asphalt binders and asphalt mixtures

Zahra Sotoodeh-Nia, Nicholas Manke, R. Christopher Williams, Eric. W. Cochran, Laurent Porot, Emmanuel Chailleux, Davide Lo Presti, Ana Jiménez del Barco Carrión, Juliette Blanc

Publisher page

Abstract

An experimental study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of two bio-additives as rejuvenators on the properties of asphalt mixtures containing 50% RAP and their binder constituents containing 37% RAP binder. Before mixing, the rejuvenators were blended with fresh bitumen and the extracted and recovered RAP bitumen, and changes in the rheological properties of the binders were assessed using performance grading (PG) criteria. The results showed that both rejuvenators could improve the low-temperature performance of the aged RAP binder and restore its low-temperature properties. Master curves for the unaged, RTFO-aged, and PAV aged blends were constructed using both the Christensen-Anderson-Marasteanu (CAM) model and the Sigmoidal models. A comparative statistical analysis conducted on the models indicated no significant difference between the measured and predicted complex modulus values at any aging conditions. The pairwise statistical comparison between the two models showed that at unaged conditions, they can perfectly overlap as the p-values were greater than the level of significance. However, for the PAV-aged binders, this behaviour appears to weaken due to the brittle behaviour of the binders. Further statistical analyses revealed no significant differences between the two models at unaged conditions, however, as the binders where subjected to aging, significant differences between the two models began to appear. Mixing was performed in two locations: lab and plant, while compaction was performed only in the lab. After mixing and compaction, mixtures were evaluated for their stiffness characteristics through dynamic modulus testing. Compared to the control mixture, rejuvenated mixtures showed lower dynamic modulus values specially at high temperatures. A statistical comparison between the lab-produced, lab-compacted mixtures and plant-produced, lab compacted mixtures showed that both the rejuvenation and the location of mixing were significant factors in the stiffness measurements.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA

Kraton Chemical B.V, Almere, Netherlands

IFSTTAR, LUNAM Université, Bouguenais, France

Nottingham Transportation Engineering Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/14680629.2002.968993310.1080/14680629.2002.9689933 ↗
2. Al-Qadi I. L. · 2007
3. Anderson R. M. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2011 · 80 · 615
4. 10.1617/s11527-013-0191-510.1617/s11527-013-0191-5 ↗
5. 10.1080/14680629.2017.130425310.1080/14680629.2017.1304253 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.27310.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.273 ↗
7. Chailleux E. · 2017
8. Copeland A. · 2011
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.19510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.195 ↗
10. Glover, C. J., Davison, R. R., Domke, C. H., Ruan, Y., Juristyarini, P., Knorr, D. B. & Jung, S. H. (2005). Development of a new method for assessing asphalt binder durability with field validation. Texas Dept Transport, 1872.
11. Inc, S. I. (1989–2007). JMP, Pro 13. Cary, NC.
12. Kandhal P. S. · 1998
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:1(81)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:1(81) ↗
14. 10.1007/978-94-007-4566-7_4410.1007/978-94-007-4566-7_44 ↗
15. Marasteanu, M. O. (2000). Interconversions of the linear viscoelastic functions used for the rheological characterization of asphalt binders (Thesis in Civil Engineering). Pennsylvania State University.
16. Marateanu M. O. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1996 · 65 · 408
17. McDaniel R. S. · NCHRP Web Document · 2000 · 30
18. Pellinen T. K. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2002 · 71 · 281
19. Pellinen, T. K., Witczak, M. W. & Bonaquist, R. F. (2004). Asphalt mix master curve construction using sigmoidal fitting function with non-linear least squares optimization. In Recent advances in materials characterization and modeling of pavement systems (pp. 83–101).
20. 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.09410.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.094 ↗
21. Porot, L. & Grady, W. (2016). Effectiveness of a bio-based additive to restore properties of aged asphalt binder. Proceeding international society for asphalt pavements (ISAP) symposium.
22. Roberts F. L. · 1991
23. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126675710.1080/14680629.2016.1266757 ↗
24. Tran, N. H., Taylor, A. & Willis, R. (2012). Effect of rejuvenator on performance properties of HMA mixtures with high RAP and RAS contents (NCAT Report). pp. 12-05.
25. Turner, P., Taylor, A. & Tran, P. N. (2015). Laboratory evaluation of SYLVAROADTM RP 1000 rejuvenator: Draft NCAT report. Auburn, AL.
26. 10.3141/2369-0510.3141/2369-05 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.06.03810.1016/j.fuel.2014.06.038 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.10510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.105 ↗
29. 10.1080/10298436.2014.89333110.1080/10298436.2014.893331 ↗